Biomedical subjects

R Setiono

Publications and source records attributed to R Setiono.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Feedforward neural network construction using cross validation.

This article presents an algorithm that constructs feedforward neural networks with a single hidden layer for pattern classification. The algorithm starts with a small number of hidden units in the network and adds more hidden units as needed to improve the network's predictive accuracy. To determine when to stop adding new hidden units, the algorithm makes use of a subset of the available training samples for cross validation. New hidden units are added to the network only if they improve the classification accuracy of the network on the training samples and on the cross-validation samples. Extensive experimental results show that the algorithm is effective in obtaining networks with predictive accuracy rates that are better than those obtained by state-of-the-art decision tree methods.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2000

A comparison between two neural network rule extraction techniques for the diagnosis of hepatobiliary disorders.

Neural networks have been widely used as tools for prediction in medicine. We expect to see even more applications of neural networks for medical diagnosis as recently developed neural network rule extraction algorithms make it possible for the decision process of a trained network to be expressed as classification rules. These rules are more comprehensible to a human user than the classification process of the networks which involves complex nonlinear mapping of the input data. This paper reports the results from two neural network rule extraction techniques, NeuroLinear and NeuroRule applied to the diagnosis of hepatobiliary disorders. The dataset consists of nine measurements collected from patients in a Japanese hospital and these measurements have continuous values. NeuroLinear generates piece-wise linear discriminant functions for this dataset. The continuous measurements have previously been discretized by domain experts. NeuroRule is applied to the discretized dataset to generate symbolic classification rules. We compare the rules generated by the two techniques and find that the rules generated by NeuroLinear from the original continuously valued dataset to be slightly more accurate and more concise than the rules generated by NeuroRule from the discretized dataset.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2000

Generating concise and accurate classification rules for breast cancer diagnosis.

In our previous work, we have presented an algorithm that extracts classification rules from trained neural networks and discussed its application to breast cancer diagnosis. In this paper, we describe how the accuracy of the networks and the accuracy of the rules extracted from them can be improved by a simple pre-processing of the data. Data pre-processing involves selecting the relevant input attributes and removing those samples with missing attribute values. The rules generated by our neural network rule extraction algorithm are more concise and accurate than those generated by other rule generating methods reported in the literature.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1997

A penalty-function approach for pruning feedforward neural networks.

This article proposes the use of a penalty function for pruning feedforward neural network by weight elimination. The penalty function proposed consists of two terms. The first term is to discourage the use of unnecessary connections, and the second term is to prevent the weights of the connections from taking excessively large values. Simple criteria for eliminating weights from the network are also given. The effectiveness of this penalty function is tested on three well-known problems: the contiguity problem, the parity problems, and the monks problems. The resulting pruned networks obtained for many of these problems have fewer connections than previously reported in the literature.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1997

Extracting rules from neural networks by pruning and hidden-unit splitting.

An algorithm for extracting rules from a standard three-layer feedforward neural network is proposed. The trained network is first pruned not only to remove redundant connections in the network but, more important, to detect the relevant inputs. The algorithm generates rules from the pruned network by considering only a small number of activation values at the hidden units. If the number of inputs connected to a hidden unit is sufficiently small, then rules that describe how each of its activation values is obtained can be readily generated. Otherwise the hidden unit will be split and treated as output units, with each output unit corresponding to an activation value. A hidden layer is inserted and a new subnetwork is formed, trained, and pruned. This process is repeated until every hidden unit in the network has a relatively small number of input units connected to it. Examples on how the proposed algorithm works are shown using real-world data arising from molecular biology and signal processing. Our results show that for these complex problems, the algorithm can extract reasonably compact rule sets that have high predictive accuracy rates.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1996

Extracting rules from pruned networks for breast cancer diagnosis.

A new algorithm for neural network pruning is presented. Using this algorithm, networks with small number of connections and high accuracy rates for breast cancer diagnosis are obtained. We will then describe how rules can be extracted from a pruned network by considering only a finite number of hidden unit activation values. The accuracy of the extracted rules is as high as the accuracy of the pruned network. For the breast cancer diagnosis problem, the concise rules extracted from the network achieve an accuracy rate of more than 95% on the training data set and on the test data set.

Algorithms↗