PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Soltmann

Publications and source records attributed to R Soltmann.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Accuracy of quantification of mandibular condyle displacement in digitally subtracted linear tomograms.

Using a TMJ skeletal phantom, we assessed validity and reliability of digitally subtracted linear tomographic images to quantify condylar position changes. Horizontally corrected frontal and lateral tomographic images were made with the condyle in a 'centred' position and displaced by 1, 2 and 3 mm increments in two of three directions (inferior, and posterior, or lateral). Film images were sequentially subtracted and then randomized so that observers were blinded to the amount and direction of condylar movement. Averages of three measurements of the dark bands representing condylar shifts were made using a digitizing tablet. The study utilized a nested design where the series of film images was subtracted twice and each subtraction was read twice by two examiners. We repeated the study with a second series of films treated in an identical manner. Average differences from expected values were similar for frontal and lateral techniques and all directions and increments of displacement. Typical average difference for any increment was less than 0.1 mm. Standard deviations in measures were similar across techniques and increments and were typically less than 0.1 mm. Significant variation in the absolute value of differences between measured and expected values by direction of condylar displacement was attributed to greater accuracy of registration on the vertical axis for frontal images. A significant source of variation in the study design element 'film set' was attributed to errors in repositioning the phantom.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Analysis of Variance↗

Digitally subtracted linear tomograms: three techniques for measuring condylar displacement.

Using digital subtraction enhancement, we compared the accuracy of three tomographic technique variations for quantifying small changes of condylar position. A phantom made of skeletal material and an adjustable mechanical stage provided 0.1 mm positioning accuracy of the condylar segment. Linear tomographic images were made with the condyle in a centered position and at each of three 1 mm increments of displacement in two of three directions (inferior, and posterior or lateral). Variations for frontal views included arbitrary (+20 degrees) and individualized (+10 degrees) horizontal correction of the condylar axis. Variations for lateral views included the arbitrary and individualized correction and a fully corrected vertical (+5 degrees) and horizontal (+10 degrees) adjustment. Blinded observers made repeated measurements on randomized subtraction images with a digitizing tablet. Film images were subtracted twice, and each subtraction was read twice by two examiners. The study was repeated with a second series of films treated in an identical manner. Mean values for measurements, standard deviations, and absolute values of differences between measured and expected values were calculated for each subtraction. Analysis of variance identified statistically significant sources of variation in repositioning the phantom and producing exact displacements of the condyle. Average absolute value of differences from expected values were similar for the three techniques and for frontal and lateral orientations and increments of displacement. Typical absolute value of difference for any technique was 0.2 mm for posterior, 0.2 mm for lateral, and 0.1 mm for inferior displacements. Significantly greater accuracy of inferior displacement measures was attributed to greater accuracy of registration of the fossa in its cranio-caudal dimension.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Analysis of Variance↗