PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Stanley Baker

Publications and source records attributed to R Stanley Baker.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Amplitude effects on electrocochleography outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Electrocochleography measures in humans were examined to determine factors affecting results. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Analysis was performed on data from 479 patients seen from 1998 to 2002 who underwent electrocochleography with a tympanic membrane electrode. Measures from click evoked electrocochleography (the summating potential to action potential ratio [SP/AP]) were compared with tone evoked electrocochleography (the SP amplitude). RESULTS: Findings indicate a strong correlation between click and tone measures if the AP from click measures was over 1 microV (P <.001), but no significant correlation between these measures if the AP was under 1 microV. Results were also analyzed with respect to patient hearing sensitivity and final diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Tympanic membrane electrocochleography is more efficacious when the AP from click stimulation is over 1 microV.

Adolescent↗

Phase III clinical trial results with the Vibrant Soundbridge implantable middle ear hearing device: a prospective controlled multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of the study was to evaluate the performance of a semi-implantable middle ear hearing device (Vibrant Soundbridge System [VSB]; Symphonix Devices, Inc). STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, single-subject, repeated-measures multicenter study was conducted to determine the safety and efficacy of the VSB using analog and digital external processors. Measures included residual hearing, functional gain, speech recognition, acoustic feedback, occlusion, and patient self-assessment to determine satisfaction, perceived performance, and device preference compared with an appropriately fit acoustic hearing aid. Fifty-three adult subjects with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss were evaluated at 4 or more intervals after implantation. RESULTS: Improvements in satisfaction, performance, and preference were statistically significant with the VSB, as was functional gain across all test frequencies (P < 0.001). Occlusion and feedback were virtually eliminated. Aided speech recognition was comparable between VSB and the hearing aid. Residual hearing was unchanged. CONCLUSION: The VSB is a safe and effective treatment option for adults with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss.

Adult↗