PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Stephen J Burnett

Publications and source records attributed to R Stephen J Burnett.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum.

BACKGROUND: The clinical presentation of a labral tear of the acetabulum may be variable, and the diagnosis is often delayed. We sought to define the clinical characteristics associated with symptomatic acetabular labral tears by reviewing a group of patients who had an arthroscopically confirmed diagnosis. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records for sixty-six consecutive patients (sixty-six hips) who had a documented labral tear that had been confirmed with hip arthroscopy. We had prospectively recorded demographic factors, symptoms, physical examination findings, previous treatments, functional limitations, the manner of onset, the duration of symptoms until the diagnosis of the labral tear, other diagnoses offered by health-care providers, and other surgical procedures that these patients had undergone. Radiographic abnormalities and magnetic resonance arthrography findings were also recorded. RESULTS: The study group included forty-seven female patients (71%) and nineteen male patients (29%) with a mean age of thirty-eight years. The initial presentation was insidious in forty patients, was associated with a low-energy acute injury in twenty, and was associated with major trauma in six. Moderate to severe pain was reported by fifty-seven patients (86%), with groin pain predominating (sixty-one patients; 92%). Sixty patients (91%) had activity-related pain (p < 0.0001), and forty-seven patients (71%) had night pain (p = 0.0006). On examination, twenty-six patients (39%) had a limp, twenty-five (38%) had a positive Trendelenburg sign, and sixty-three (95%) had a positive impingement sign. The mean time from the onset of symptoms to the diagnosis of a labral tear was twenty-one months. A mean of 3.3 health-care providers had been seen by the patients prior to the definitive diagnosis. Surgery on another anatomic site had been recommended for eleven patients (17%), and four had undergone an unsuccessful operative procedure prior to the diagnosis of the labral tear. At an average of 16.4 months after hip arthroscopy, fifty-nine patients (89%) reported clinical improvement in comparison with the preoperative status. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical presentation of a patient who has a labral tear may vary, and the correct diagnosis may not be considered initially. In young, active patients with a predominant complaint of groin pain with or without a history of trauma, the diagnosis of a labral tear should be suspected and investigated as radiographs and the history may be nonspecific for this diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic Level IV. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Acetabulum↗
PubMed2006

Resection arthroplasty: when enough is enough.

Resection arthroplasty following THA is rarely performed but occasionally indicated. It is a relatively low risk procedure and generally is a much shorter operative procedure associated with fewer perioperative complications compared to major revision procedures. Results are extremely variable. With all of the arthroplasty and bone graft options available for hip joint reconstruction, resection arthroplasty rarely is performed as a definitive procedure. It is, however, the best option for selected patients.

Arthroplasty↗
PubMed2006

Preoperative planning for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with more perioperative complications and unexpected findings than are encountered during primary total hip arthroplasty. Special instruments, implants, bone grafts, and other accessories may be required to treat complex problems that arise during revision surgery. Preoperative planning is important to anticipate potential complications and to ensure that all possible needed materials are readily available during surgery. Patients and their families also should be counseled on the specific additional risk factors involved in this complex surgery. An organized approach to revision total hip arthroplasty helps to reduce surgical time, minimize risks, decrease the stress level of the entire surgical team, and to increase the rate of successful outcomes for patients.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗
PubMed2005

Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Disruption of the extensor mechanism is an uncommon but catastrophic complication of total knee arthroplasty. We evaluated two techniques of reconstructing a disrupted extensor mechanism with the use of an extensor mechanism allograft in revision total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty consecutive reconstructions with the use of an extensor mechanism allograft consisting of the tibial tubercle, patellar tendon, patella, and quadriceps tendon were performed. The first seven reconstructions (Group I) were done with the allograft minimally tensioned. The thirteen subsequent procedures (Group II) were performed with the allograft tightly tensioned in full extension. All surviving allografts were evaluated clinically and radiographically after a minimum duration of follow-up of twenty-four months. RESULTS: All of the reconstructions in Group I were clinical failures, with an average postoperative extensor lag of 59 degrees (range, 40 degrees to 80 degrees ) and an average postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score of 52 points. All thirteen reconstructions in Group II were clinical successes, with an average postoperative extensor lag of 4.3 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 15 degrees ) (p < 0.0001) and an average Hospital for Special Surgery score of 88 points. Postoperative flexion did not differ significantly between Group I (average, 108 degrees ) and Group II (average, 104 degrees ) (p = 0.549). CONCLUSIONS: The results of reconstruction with an extensor mechanism allograft after total knee arthroplasty depend on the initial tensioning of the allograft. Loosely tensioned allografts result in a persistent extension lag and clinical failure. Allografts that are tightly tensioned in full extension can restore active knee extension and result in clinical success. On the basis of the number of knees that we studied, there was no significant loss of flexion. Use of an extensor mechanism graft for the treatment of a failure of the extensor mechanism will be successful only if the graft is initially tensioned tightly in full extension.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee↗
PubMed2004

Isolated liner exchange in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical results using the direct lateral surgical approach.

Twenty-four hips (23 patients) underwent isolated polyethylene liner exchange (modular and nonmodular liners) via the direct lateral surgical approach for a preoperative diagnosis of polyethylene wear and acetabular osteolysis. Accessible osteolytic lesions were bone grafted with cancellous allograft. Patients were followed up clinically and radiographically, with a mean follow-up time of 36 months (range, 12-100 months). A computer-assisted method measured lesional area from the radiographs of the 18 hips that presented with osteolysis. Seventeen of 18 lesions either regressed or resolved since the procedure. Two patients required repeat revisions, and no dislocations were noted. Clinically, both Harris Hip and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores improved postoperatively. In selected patients, isolated liner exchange with or without bone grafting is effective for treating polyethylene wear and associated osteolysis. Dislocation rates with revision may be reduced using a surgical approach that preserves an adequate capsular layer for closure in liner exchange surgery.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The consequences of not resurfacing the patella.

The decision of whether to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty remains controversial. In this study, a meta-analysis of national joint replacement registry data, bilateral total knee replacement studies, selective resurfacing reports, and randomized clinical trials was done Although the evidence seems to support patellar resurfacing, this issue remains inconclusive because of problems generalizing from one implant to another and the short-term nature of available studies. Based on existing data, patellar resurfacing seems reasonable in most total knee replacements. Not resurfacing the patella might be considered in selected younger patients (<60 years) with mild or no patellar arthritis, a well-tracking extensor mechanism, and particularly if a patella-friendly femoral component is used.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee↗
PubMed2004

Extensor mechanism allograft reconstruction after total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of two techniques.

BACKGROUND: Disruption of the extensor mechanism is an uncommon but catastrophic complication of total knee arthroplasty. We evaluated two techniques of reconstructing a disrupted extensor mechanism with use of an extensor mechanism allograft following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: Twenty consecutive reconstructions with use of an extensor mechanism allograft consisting of the tibial tubercle, patellar tendon, patella, and quadriceps tendon were performed. The first seven reconstructions (Group I) were done with the allograft minimally tensioned. The thirteen subsequent procedures (Group II) were performed with the allograft tightly tensioned in full extension. All surviving allografts were evaluated clinically and radiographically after a minimum duration of follow-up of twenty-four months. RESULTS: All of the reconstructions in Group I were clinical failures, with an average postoperative extensor lag of 59 degrees (range, 40 degrees to 80 degrees ) and an average postoperative Hospital for Special Surgery knee score of 52 points. All thirteen reconstructions in Group II were clinical successes, with an average postoperative extensor lag of 4.3 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 15 degrees ) (p < 0.0001) and an average Hospital for Special Surgery score of 88 points. Postoperative flexion did not differ significantly between Group I (average, 108 degrees ) and Group II (average, 104 degrees ) (p = 0.549). CONCLUSIONS: The results of reconstruction with an extensor mechanism allograft after total knee arthroplasty depend on the initial tensioning of the allograft. Loosely tensioned allografts result in a persistent extension lag and clinical failure. Allografts that are tightly tensioned in full extension can restore active knee extension and result in clinical success. On the basis of the number of knees that we studied, there was no significant loss of flexion. Use of an extensor mechanism graft for the treatment of a failure of the extensor mechanism will be successful only if the graft is initially tensioned tightly in full extension. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III-2 (retrospective cohort study). See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Assessment and classification of bone stock deficiency in revision total hip arthroplasty.

It is critical for appropriate treatment choices in revision total hip arthroplasty that bone stock deficiency be assessed and classified. Acetabular and femoral defects must be separately assessed, although a combined assessment is needed at the time of surgery to select the appropriate match of components for a given patient. Classification systems help surgeons predict defects and determine reconstruction planning prior to surgery. This article presents the senior author's classification of acetabular and femoral defects for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Acetabulum↗
PubMed2002

Extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty: rationale and results.

Optimal outcomes of revision femoral arthroplasty include achieving rotational stability of the revision implant, preventing axial migration of the implant to obtain stability, and reproducing normal hip biomechanics. Cemented and proximally porous-coated implants are not well-suited to achieving these goals in the presence of metaphyseal bone defects and poor endosteal cement bonding. Extensively porous-coated implants are more likely to achieve these goals if the selection of the implant is appropriate for each defect encountered and if technical problems can be identified that may arise during canal preparation andcomponent insertion. The selection of curved implants for longer revisions may help avoid complications.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗