PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Stupp

Publications and source records attributed to R Stupp.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Current and future developments in the use of temozolomide for the treatment of brain tumours.

Brain tumours comprise only 2% of all adult cancers, but they are among the most debilitating malignant diseases. Temozolomide, an alkylating agent that can be administered orally, has been approved for the treatment of recurrent malignant glioma on a daily schedule for 5-day cycles. Continuous administration schedules with a higher dose intensity are being explored, but an improvement in efficiency remains to be shown. The benefit from temozolomide given as a single agent in recurrent disease will be several weeks at best. This drug is therefore now undergoing clinical testing as neoadjuvant chemotherapy or with concomitant radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioma. Several phase I trials are investigating the combination of temozolomide with other agents active against brain tumours. This review briefly summarises the pharmacological background and clinical development of temozolomide and focuses on current and future clinical exploration of this drug for the treatment of brain tumours.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗
PubMed2001

Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is resistant to most therapeutic endeavors, with low response rates and survival rarely exceeding six months. There are no clearly established chemotherapeutic regimens and the aim of treatment is palliation with improvement in the quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report an open-label, uncontrolled, multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in 138 patients (intent-to-treat [ITT] population) with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 70. One hundred twenty-eight patients were histologically confirmed with GBM or gliosarcoma (GS) by independent central review. Chemotherapy-naïve patients were treated with temozolomide 200 mg/m2/day orally for the first five days of a 28-day cycle. Patients previously treated with nitrosourea-containing adjuvant chemotherapy received 150 mg/m2/day for the first five days of a 28-day cycle. In the absence of grade 3 or 4 toxicity, patients on the 150 mg/m2 dose schedule were eligible for a 200 mg/m2 dose on the next cycle. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was six-month progression-free survival assessed with strict radiological and clinical criteria. Secondary endpoints included radiological response and Health-related Quality of Life (HQL). Progression-free survival at six months was 18% (95% confidence interval (CI): 11%-26%) for the eligible-histology population. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 2.1 months and 5.4 months, respectively. The six-month survival rate was 46%. The objective response rate (complete response and partial response) determined by independent central review of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans was 8% for both the ITT and eligible-histology populations, with an additional 43% and 45% of patients, respectively, having stable disease (SD). Objectively assessed response and maintenance of a progression-free status were both associated with HQL benefits (characterized by improvements over baseline in HQL domains). Temozolomide had an acceptable safety profile, with only 9% of therapy cycles requiring a dose reduction due to thrombocytopenia. There was no evidence of cumulative hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide demonstrated modest clinical efficacy, with an acceptable safety profile and measurable improvement in quality of life in patients with recurrent GBM. The use of this drug should be explored further in an adjuvant setting and in combination with other agents.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Is cisplatin required for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer? Experience and preliminary results of a phase I/II trial with topotecan and vinorelbine.

Platinum-based chemotherapy is considered standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, toxicity of most platinum-based regimens is substantial and requires close monitoring and supportive care. Over the past decade, paclitaxel, docetaxel, vinorelbine, gemcitabine, irinotecan, and topotecan have been introduced into the clinic. These newer agents have shown promising activity against NSCLC with a favorable toxicity profile as single agents. For patients with metastatic NSCLC, palliation is the main goal of therapy. Therefore, treatment should be easy to administer on an outpatient basis. We explored a novel combination therapy avoiding platinum. Patients with recurrent or metastatic NSCLC were treated with intravenous (i.v.) topotecan (0.5-1.0 mg/m(2)/day x 5) and i.v. vinorelbine (20-30 mg/m(2)/day on day 1 and day 5) in 21-day cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined separately with or without the addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Twenty-nine patients have been enrolled to date. At i.v. topotecan doses of 0.75-1.0 mg/m(2)/day and i.v. vinorelbine of 25 mg/m(2)/day, neutropenia was frequent but of short duration (<7 days). The DLT of i.v. topotecan (0.85 mg/m(2)) in the absence of G-CSF support was based on myelosuppression with neutropenic fever. With the addition of G-CSF, a DLT has not been reached. Nonhematologic toxicities included mild to moderate fatigue and constipation. An overall clinical response rate of 42% was achieved, with responses noted at all dose levels. At a short median follow-up of 15 months, the median survival for all patients is 13 months. In conclusion, the combination regimen of topotecan and vinorelbine is feasible for outpatient administration and is well tolerated with less toxicity than platinum-based regimens. Preliminary response data demonstrate good tumor activity, suggesting that this regimen could make an excellent palliative treatment for advanced NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Weekly x 4 induction therapy with the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab: effect on circulating t(14;18)(+) follicular lymphoma cells.

Rituximab 375 mg/m(2) weekly x 4 has been reported to induce a 60% response rate in patients with relapsed follicular lymphomas (FL). Our aim was to examine the effect of this rituximab schedule on circulating FL cells in an ongoing multicenter study. One hundred fifty-four patients with FL were examined by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) at baseline for the presence of t(14;18) translocation-carrying lymphoma cells in bone marrow and/or blood. Sixty-four patients (42%) had PCR-detectable t(14;18)(+) FL cells. Pretreatment characteristics of these 64 patients were as follows: one had stage I, nine had stage II, 14 had stage III, and 40 had stage IV disease. Thirty-five patients had bulky disease (> or = 5 cm) and 25 patients had an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level. Bone marrow was morphologically assessed in 64 patients, and 39 of these patients had an infiltration with FL cells. Blood samples from 51 patients were available for PCR analysis between weeks 8-12 after induction therapy, and 28 of these patients (55%) were PCR negative. Paired blood and bone marrow samples were available for PCR analysis from 39 patients between weeks 8-12 after induction therapy with rituximab. Thirteen of these patients (33%) did not have PCR-detectable cells in blood and bone marrow, while 26 patients (67%) still had circulating t(14;18)(+) cells in either bone marrow (eight patients), blood (one patient), or both (17 patients). PCR negativity in blood and bone marrow in 13 patients was statistically significantly associated with partial or complete response after induction therapy with rituximab (P = 0.006). However, clearance of PCR-detectable t(14;18)(+) cells in bone marrow and/or blood could not be associated with any low tumor burden pretreatment characteristics such as stages I/II, absence of morphological bone marrow infiltration or tumor bulk of > or = 5 cm, and normal serum LDH.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase II study of docetaxel in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer in routine daily practice.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of docetaxel as first- and second-line chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) under routine clinical conditions. Two hundred and three patients with advanced NSCLC received docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (1-h intravenous infusion) every 3 weeks, with oral corticosteroid pre-medication, of whom 173 were eligible. Median age was 60 (29-78) years and median Karnofsky performance status was 80% (60-100). A total of 77% of patients had metastatic disease, 33% had bone metastases and 18% had liver metastases. The treatment was second-line or more for 72 patients (35%). Overall response rates in the eligible population were 19.7% [95% CI, 12.5-23.0] for both treatments, 22.6% for first-line treatment and 13.8% for second-line treatment. Median survival was 8.3 months and 1-year survival was 35% for the overall population (8.7 months and 38%, respectively, for patients receiving first-line treatment and 7.2 months and 27%, respectively, for patients receiving second-line treatment). Neutropenia, grade 3 and 4, occurred in 57% of the cycles and 5% of patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Alopecia (62% of patients), neuro-sensory symptoms (32%), asthenia (28%), diarrhea (22%), nausea (22%) and nail disorders (20%) were the most common non-hematological adverse effects. A total of 33% of patients suffered fluid retention, despite the use of corticosteroid pre-medication, but this was only severe in 1.5% of patients. It was possible to confirm the efficacy of docetaxel as a single agent for first- and second-line chemotherapy in a large patient population treated in a community setting.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase II study of docetaxel alternating with cisplatin in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

The objective of this study was to evaluate a regimen of full doses of docetaxel and cisplatin, using an alternating schedule, as first-line therapy for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard concomitant schedule does not allow full doses of both drugs to be administered. We wanted to see if there was an advantage to be gained by administering full doses of both docetaxel and cisplatin, using a different schedule. Docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was given once every 6 weeks from week 1 and cisplatin (120 mg/m2 for two doses and 100 mg/m2 thereafter) once every 6 weeks from week 4, for six cycles (three docetaxel and three cisplatin). Thirty-six of the 44 patients enrolled were evaluable for efficacy. Forty-eight percent of the patients had good (KPS 90-100%) performance status. A median of five cycles was administered, for which no dose reductions were necessary. There were 13 of 36 partial responses (36%; 95% CI 21-54%) and 15 of 36 patients achieved stable disease (42%). The median duration of response was 10.5 months, the median time to progression was 4.5 months and the median survival was 9 months. The 1 and 2 year survival rates were 39 and 16%, respectively. The most frequent grade 3-4 toxicities were nausea (23% of patients), vomiting (18%) and neutropenia (77%). Infections were also common, but not severe. The alternating schedule produced response, toxicity and survival figures that compared favorable with those using the concomitant schedule. This study could serve as a model for future studies of non-cisplatin-containing regimens, in which full doses of docetaxel could alternate with full doses of other new agents active against NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

The effect of Rituximab on patients with follicular and mantle-cell lymphoma. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

BACKGROUND: Clinical activity of the anti CD-20 monoclonal antibody Rituximab has been reported in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) and mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 120 patients with bi-dimensionally measurable FL or MCL (R.E.A.L. Classification) were treated with Rituximab 375 mg/m2/week for 4 weeks. A central pathology review confirmed the diagnosis of FL in 76 of 78 and of MCL in 39 of 42 cases. The response was evaluated after 8 weeks and confirmed after 12 weeks from the start of treatment. RESULTS: The toxicity of the treatment was, as expected, grade 1-2 fever and rigors during the first infusion and mild asthenia during the treatment period. Serious adverse events, probably or possibly related to the study treatment, included four deaths (3 of cardiac origin, 1 caused by P. carinii pneumonia) and 10 further nonfatal cases, including a permanent agranulocytosis and one case of heart failure. Response rate at week 12 was 52% for FL and 22% for MCL. After treatment, the BCL-2 rearrangement disappeared in 15 of 29 blood but only in 5 of 23 bone marrow samples; BCL-1 disappeared in 5 of 12 blood and 0 of 7 bone marrow specimens, as determined by PCR. CONCLUSIONS: Rituximab is an active agent for the treatment of FL, while its efficacy is modest in MCL. The effect in reducing minimal residual disease is more pronounced on the blood than it is on the bone marrow.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Ventricular arrhythmia and torsade de pointe: dose limiting toxicities of the MDR-modulator S9788 in a phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: S9788 is a triazineaminopiperidine derivative capable of reversing multidrug resistance (MDR) in vitro. In preclinical models S9788 was several fold more potent MDR inhibitor than verapamil or cyclosporine. At P-glycoprotein (Pgp) blocking concentrations, S9788 appeared to have only very little toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a two step phase I trial we treated 39 patients with refractory cancer with S9788 and bolus doxorubicin. The steps differed mainly in the S9788 infusion duration; in the first part 23 patients received the MDR-reversing drug S9788 over 30 minutes, in the second step of the study 16 patients were administered S9788 over 150 minutes. The doses of S9788 were escalated in cohorts of three patients up to a dose level (DL) of 96 mg/m2 on the 30 minutes infusion, and to 144 mg/m2 on the 150 minutes infusion. The pharmacokinetics of S9788 were determined. RESULTS: With the 30-minute infusion schedule symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia were found to be dose limiting. In all patients at the highest DL transient cardiac repolarization prolongation with a long QT-interval on ECG was demonstrated. With the 150-minute administration schedule, S9788 could be escalated up to 144 mg/m2 without subjective toxicity. However, transient QT prolongation was present in all patients. A third degree AV-block and a QT increase of about 40% occurred at the highest DL. Asymptomatic torsade de pointe (DL 96 mg/m2) was demonstrated on Holter recording in one patient. Theses repolarization disturbances with QT increase were considered dose limiting toxicity and the trial was closed. No arrhythmia related death was noted. Pharmacokinetics were similar with both infusion schedules with a mean alpha half life of 11.3 and 13.2 minutes, for the 30-minute and 150-minute infusion, and a terminal half life of 13.5 and 15 hours, respectively. QTc prolongation duration appeared to be dose-dependent. CONCLUSIONS: With the tested infusion schedules, cardiac toxicity, in particular AV-blocks and QT prolongation, leading to ventricular arrhythmia and torsade de pointe, are the dose limiting toxicities of S9788. Our experience together with the observation of asymptomatic torsade de pointe in two other phase 1 trials of S9788 infused over six hours precluded the further clinical development of S9788.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase I study of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with paclitaxel, fluorouracil, and hydroxyurea with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for patients with poor-prognosis cancer of the head and neck.

PURPOSE: We have previously demonstrated high locoregional control rates in patients with poor-prognosis head and neck cancer using fluorouracil (5-FU), hydroxyurea (HU), and concomitant radiotherapy (RT) (FHX). In the trial reported here, we added paclitaxel to the FHX base and used hyperfractionated RT to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and response rate in a poor-prognosis group of patients. METHODS: Fifty-five patients who had either failed to respond to prior RT (n = 25) or surgery, had a coexistent or prior second malignancy, or who had unresectable or metastatic disease and an expected 2-year survival rate less than 10%, were treated. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of 2 Gy on days 2 to 6 (once-daily RT cohorts) or 1.5 Gy twice a day (hyperfractionated cohorts). Simultaneous HU (500 or 1,000 mg twice per day for 11 doses) and infusional 5-FU (600-800 mg/m2/d for 5 days) were given along with infusional paclitaxel at escalating doses of 5 to 25 mg/m2/d for 5 days. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was administered on days 7 through 13 at 5 microg/kg/d. Cycles were repeated every 14 days until completion of RT. Plasma paclitaxel levels were determined on day 4 of cycle 1. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) consisted of myelosuppression, mucositis, dermatitis, and diarrhea. Plasma concentrations of paclitaxel greater than 10 nmol/L were achieved in 65% of patients at the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) level of paclitaxel. Seventy percent of assessable patients achieved a complete response (CR) to therapy. Twenty patients were treated at the RPTD of HU 500 mg orally twice daily for 11 doses, 5-FU 600 mg/m2/d by continuous infusion for 5 days; and paclitaxel 20 mg/m2/d by continuous infusion for 5 days, with twice-daily RT. CONCLUSION: The addition of infusional paclitaxel and hyperfractionated RT to FHX is feasible. Radiosensitizing levels of paclitaxel are achieved in most patients. The high locoregional control rate of this regimen justifies further investigation in previously untreated patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The role of paclitaxel in the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Current chemotherapeutic approaches to recurrent head and neck cancer have routinely yielded response rates of 10% to 30% (for single agents) and 30% to 50% (for combination chemotherapy). However, median survival times for patients with metastatic and/or recurrent disease have stagnated at around 6 months since the 1970s. The investigation of new drugs and treatment approaches thus continues to be a high priority. One such agent, paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), has shown good single-agent activity and is also believed to potentiate the effects of radiation therapy in patients with head and neck cancer. We have focused on the addition of paclitaxel to the previously established combination of 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and radiation therapy. The study goals are to establish the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicity of paclitaxel when added to this combination as a 5-day continuous infusion on a biweekly schedule. Preliminary results of this ongoing study have demonstrated activity in patients with poor-prognosis head and neck cancer. Major dose-limiting toxicities have consisted of neutropenia and mucositis, and definition of a recommended phase II dose is in progress.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

[Advances in the treatment of head and neck tumors. 2. Radiochemotherapy].

PURPOSE: Local recurrences are one of the main reasons of failure of therapy for locally advanced cancer of the head and neck. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy and accelerated radiation techniques are supposed to improve the locoregional control rates. METHODS: We review the theoretical background and the most important larger clinical trials using concomitant or alternating chemoradiotherapy. The data of alternative fractionation schedules are also briefly reviewed. RESULTS: For many chemotherapy agents a radiosensitizing effect has been shown. Significantly improved locoregional control has been shown for mitomycin C, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. Most studies failed to show improved survival. The major factor for this negative result is the common multimorbidity of patients leading to death of other causes then cancer. CONCLUSION: Concomitant, alternating or split course chemoradiotherapy can improve locoregional control. Improved survival has been shown rarely. Confirmatory studies are necessary before adapting this approach in daily practice outside clinical trials. Accelerated hyperfractionation with or without chemotherapy may further improve the control rates. Reirradiation with concomitant chemotherapy in recurrent tumors achieves complete response rates of over 40%.

Cisplatin↗
PubMed1995

Hydroxyurea with continuous infusion paclitaxel, 5-fluorouracil, and concomitant radiotherapy for poor-prognosis head and neck cancer.

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy holds promise in the therapy of advanced head and neck cancer. We have previously reported on the combination of 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and concomitant chemoradiotherapy administered on an alternate-week basis. In this ongoing study, we are testing the feasibility of adding continuous-infusion paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) to this combination. Background information and early clinical data are presented.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1995

[Advances in the treatment of head and neck tumors. I. Chemotherapy].

PURPOSE: Cancer of the head and neck is commonly diagnosed in an advanced stage with a poor prognosis. New active agents and combinations have recently been identified. By adding chemotherapy to a multimodality approach with surgery and radiation therapy the outcome may be altered. METHODS: We reviewed the more recently published literature on induction and adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Four conclusive randomized trials of induction chemotherapy have failed to show an improved survival. No survival advantage has been shown for adjuvant chemotherapy. Organ preservation can be achieved with induction chemotherapy followed by limited surgery and radiation in approximately two thirds of the patients with laryngeal carcinoma. Patients achieving a complete response after induction chemotherapy have a better prognosis. Chemotherapy has consistently shown to reduce the frequency of distant metastases. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy is indicated only in recurrent or metastatic disease. Induction chemotherapy is limited to laryngeal carcinoma with organ preservation as intent. Local recurrences and intercurrent morbidity are the main reasons for treatment failures.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1995

5-fluorouracil plus radiation for head and neck cancer.

5-fluorouracil is a widely used chemotherapeutic agent. Its role and activity in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are reviewed. In head and neck cancer, 5-fluorouracil is mostly used in combination with cisplatin. Despite a high activity of this regimen, as documented in response rates of up to 90%, its use as an adjuvant to surgery and radiation does not impact consistently on survival rates. In contrast, 5-FU-based chemotherapy with concomitant radiotherapy seems to improve treatment outcome. Several randomized trials suggest improved locoregional control with concomitant chemoradiotherapy with a 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen. The activity and the metabolism of 5-FU can be further modulated by cisplatin, hydroxyurea, and leucovorin.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗