PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Suburu

Publications and source records attributed to R Suburu.

10 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy: the Canadian experience.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of neoadjuvant combination therapy with the antiandrogen flutamide and a luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist administered for 3 months before radical prostatectomy, compared with surgery alone in early stage prostate cancer on histopathologic findings at surgery and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA). METHODS: A sample of 161 randomly screened patients diagnosed as having stage B (134 patients) or C (27 patients) prostate cancer were randomly assigned to radical prostatectomy alone or to 3 months of neoadjuvant combination therapy with the antiandrogen flutamide and an LHRH agonist before radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Neoadjuvant combination therapy before radical prostatectomy decreased cancer-positive surgical margins from 33.8% in the control group to only 7.8%, thus leaving 92.2% of patients with negative margins at surgery. A net 54% improvement of staging was observed in favor of combination therapy. Organ-confined disease, on the other hand, increased from 49.3% to 77.8% of patients after 3 months of combination therapy, for a 57.8% increase in the incidence of organ-confined disease. No cancer was found in 6 (6.7%) prostatectomy specimens from the treated group. A close correlation was found between serum PSA at diagnosis and the stage of the disease at surgery. Upstaging increased from 30% at serum PSA values of 0 to 3.0 ng/mL up to 100% at serum PSA values above 15 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Although long-term follow-up of these patients is required to determine the impact on survival, the marked influence of neoadjuvant combination therapy on the stage of the disease suggests the possibility of a major improvement in the morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Diagnosis of advanced or noncurable prostate cancer can be practically eliminated by prostate-specific antigen.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the percentage of localized and potentially curable prostate cancers diagnosed at follow-up screening visits compared with the first screening visit. METHODS: Within the context of a prospective screening study performed in randomly chosen men aged between 45 and 80 years, up to 6-year follow-up screening visits have been performed with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement and digital rectal examination (DRE) followed by transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate when PSA or DRE is abnormal. RESULTS: Of the 117 prostate cancers diagnosed at 14,554 annual follow-up visits, only 1 cancer (0.9%) was metastatic compared with 8% (26/322) at 8029 first visits. Moreover, 97% of the cancers detected at follow-up visits could be identified by PSA alone compared with 86% at first visit. The incidence of 0.8% per year during 15 years of screening between the ages of 55 and 70 years would diagnose localized prostate cancer in 12% of the population, a value not too different from the 10% diagnosed with prostate cancer during life-time in the absence of screening. CONCLUSIONS: The present data show that annual screening with PSA diagnoses clinically localized prostate cancer in more than 95% of cases, thus almost completely eliminating the diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer. Moreover, the number of prostate cancers diagnosed is not significantly increased by screening.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Downstaging by combination therapy with flutamide and an LHRH agonist before radical prostatectomy.

A total of 161 patients diagnosed as having stage B (134 patients) or C (27 patients) prostate cancer were randomly assigned to radical prostatectomy alone or to 3 months of neoadjuvant combination therapy with the anti-androgen flutamide and an LHRH agonist before radical prostatectomy. Neoadjuvant combination therapy before radical prostatectomy decreased cancer positive surgical margins from 33.8% in the control group to only 7.8%, thus leaving 92.2% of patients with negative margins at surgery for a 39.2% increase in specimen confined disease. Although on average the final stage determined at histopathological examination of the surgical specimen was more advanced than predicted at initial diagnosis in 33.8% of control patients, an opposite observation was made in the group of men who received the 3 month neoadjuvant combination therapy where the final stage, instead of being more advanced, was less advanced than at diagnosis in an average of 21.1% of men for a net 54.9% improvement of staging in favour of combination therapy. On the other hand, organ confined disease increased from 49.3% to 77.8% of patients after 3 months of combination therapy, for a 57.9% increase in the incidence of organ confined disease. Although long term follow up of these patients is required to determine the impact on survival, the marked influence of neoadjuvant combination therapy on the stage of the disease suggests the possibility of a major improvement in the morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Combination therapy with flutamide and the LHRH agonist [D-Trp6, des-Gly-NH(2)10]LHRH ethylamide in stage C prostatic carcinoma.

A series of 115 previously untreated patients displaying clinical stage C prostatic carcinoma with no evidence of distant metastases received combination therapy using the antiandrogen flutamide and the LHRH agonist [D-Trp6, des-Gly-NH(2)10]LHRH ethylamide; the average follow-up was 3.9 years. Twenty-eight patients showed treatment failure with a probability of disease-free survival of 91.2% at 2 years. Twenty patients died from prostate cancer and 10 from other causes, the survival probability being 93.4% at 2 years. Local control was achieved rapidly in all patients. Urinary obstruction and hydronephrosis were corrected in all cases. When compared with data obtained after single endocrine therapy (orchiectomy or oestrogens) or radiotherapy, the treatment failure rate at 2 years was more than 3.0-fold lower after combination therapy (8.8%) than monotherapy (28.4%). The death rate 2 years after the start of combination therapy was 6.6% and was on average 22.2% (3.6-fold higher) in the studies using monotherapy (orchiectomy or oestrogens) or radiotherapy. The present data suggest that treatment of prostate cancer with combination therapy before clinical evidence of dissemination of disease permits more efficient control of local disease and a decreased rate of progression to metastatic disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Optimized strategy for detection of early stage, curable prostate cancer: role of prescreening with prostate-specific antigen.

In 1,002 men aged 45-80 y, 81% of the cancers detectable by serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) were present in a subpopulation (19% of total) identified by serum PSA above the threshold value of 3.0 micrograms/L. This study was extended to 7,350 men using serum PSA and DRE as first approach, followed by TRUS only when 1 of these 2 tests was abnormal. Because the aim of prostate cancer detection is to find cancers at an early, potentially curable stage, it is of major interest that 71.8% of evaluable cancers were clinical stage B; 8.4% and 10.7% were stages C1 and C2, respectively; only 9.2% were stage D (metastatic) at first visit while none was at stage D at follow-up visits. This study, the first performed in an unselected, unscreened population, shows that serum PSA is the most sensitive technique to identify men at high risk of having prostate cancer and that 12% more cancers can be found at first visit by doing DRE in addition to PSA. Follow-ups can be done every second year using serum PSA alone, as 97% of the cancers detected at annual follow-up by DRE + PSA were PSA+. Cancers are discovered by the present approach at an estimated cost of $2,665 per cancer. Such cancers are potentially curable in at least 80% of cases detected at first visit and in 97% of cases at follow-up. This strategy offers the possibility to improve markedly morbidity and mortality from prostate cancer, presently the second leading cause of cancer death in North American men.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

Downstaging of localized prostate cancer by neoadjuvant therapy with flutamide and lupron: the first controlled and randomized trial.

Although the only opportunity to cure prostate cancer is treatment at an early stage, radical prostatectomy has remained relatively unpopular because 40-50% of prostate cancers estimated at diagnosis as confined to the prostate are found to be at a more advanced stage following histopathological analysis of the surgical specimen. This first prospective, randomized trial investigated the potential advantages of 3-month neoadjuvant combination therapy with flutamide and lupron before radical prostatectomy vs. prostatectomy alone in early stage prostate cancer. Cancer-positive margins were reduced from 38.5% (25 of 65) in control patients to only 13.0% (10 of 77) in men who received neoadjuvant combination therapy with the antiandrogen flutamide and the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) super-agonist Lupron before radical prostatectomy (p = 0.006). Moreover, comparison of the final stage determined by histopathological examination of the surgical specimen with that estimated at diagnosis showed that a more advanced stage (upstaging) was found in 53.8% of controls, but patients who received combination therapy had an opposite effect: a more favorable stage than expected at diagnosis was found in 23.4% of cases (downstaging), a 77.2% advantage of neoadjuvant combination therapy. The concern about radical prostatectomy, underestimation of stage, is thus markedly improved by 3-month neoadjuvant therapy with flutamide and a LHRH superagonist. Cancer-negative margins are expected to be accompanied by a life expectancy not different from that of men of similar age with no prostate cancer; therefore, the present data, combined with efficient detection of early stage prostate cancer, offer the basis for dramatic improvement in the morbidity and mortality of prostate cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1992

Incidence of liver toxicity associated with the use of flutamide in prostate cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The incidence of flutamide-related liver toxicity was studied in 1,091 consecutive patients treated for stage C or D prostate cancer with the antiandrogen flutamide and the luteinizing hormone-releasing factor (LHRH) agonist [D-Trp6, des-Gly-NH2(10)] LHRH ethylamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Liver function tests, namely measurement of serum aspartate amino-transferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (gamma-GT), and prothrombin and thromboplastin times, were performed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks and every 3 months thereafter. Clinical signs and symptoms of liver dysfunction were also sought. The causal link between the antiandrogen used and liver injury was assessed on the basis of the temporal relationship with the use of the drug in the absence of other possible causes and, in two patients, through rechallenge of the putative causative drug after a period of normalization of liver function. RESULTS: An increase in AST and ALT at fourfold or more above upper normal limits was observed in only four patients (0.36%). Total serum bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase were elevated in only one patient at 126 mmol/L and 640 IU/L, respectively. Among the four patients, only two developed clinical manifestations of liver disease (0.18%). Biopsy was performed in one patient, and the histopathologic findings showed a mixed pattern of cytotoxic and cholestatic changes. All clinical and biologic manifestations of liver toxicity rapidly disappeared upon discontinuation of flutamide alone. No sequelae were observed in the long-term follow-up at 18, 22, 31, and 62 months. The 1,087 remaining patients experienced no or mild (less than fourfold upper normal limit) and transient elevation in aminotransferase serum levels during the first 6 months of treatment, with normalization at later time intervals. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that the cases reported so far, along with our large series, indicate that the incidence of flutamide-induced liver toxicity is very low, we recommend serial blood aminotransferase measurements at 2 and 4 weeks of treatment in order to detect early signs of possible flutamide-induced hepatic injury, thus avoiding the low potential risk of clinically significant liver toxicity.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1992

Serum prostate specific antigen as pre-screening test for prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer has become the most common cancer and the second cause of death due to cancer in men in North America. Since curative therapies are limited to early stages of the disease, the availability of an efficient, easy to perform, widely acceptable and cost-effective method of early detection of prostate cancer is particularly important. Thus, digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography of the prostate as well as measurements of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) were performed independently in a series of 1,002 men between 45 and 80 years old randomly selected from the electoral rolls of Quebec City and its vicinity as part of a screening program for prostate cancer. Using this population of randomly chosen men, various cutoff serum PSA values were selected in an attempt to find the optimal decision threshold that would indicate a much greater risk of having prostatic cancer. At a threshold value of 3.0 micrograms./l. the sensitivity and specificity of the test are 80.7 and 89.6%, respectively, while the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve reflecting the accuracy of the test is 87.8 +/- 3.3% (plus or minus standard deviation). Moreover, the negative predictive value was estimated at 98.6%, thus leaving only a 1.4% chance of missing cancer when the serum PSA value was 3.0 micrograms./l. or less. Most importantly, such a threshold level of serum PSA retains only 19% of the whole cohort as candidates for transrectal ultrasonography and expensive diagnostic procedures, thus leading to the finding of 1 prostate cancer of 4 such examinations. The present data indicate that simple measurement of serum PSA can be used efficiently as a pre-screening test for prostate cancer in the general population to identify, at a low cost, the subpopulation of men at a much greater risk of having prostate cancer, and who should then be submitted to the more elaborate and expensive diagnostic procedures.

Age Factors↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Stratification of stage D2 prostate cancer patients by a disease aggressiveness score and its use in evaluating disease response and outcome to combination hormonal treatment (GnRH-A plus flutamide).

Suppression of androgen levels of stage D2 prostate cancer patients has been the prominent treatment for advanced prostate cancer. An arithmetic formula expressing disease aggressivity computed by the pre-treatment levels of alkaline phosphatase (AP), degree of tumor differentiation and number of bone metastases correlated well with disease response and outcome in stage D2 patients treated by chronic administration of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonistic analogues (GnRH-As; buserelin) or orchiectomy. In the present study we analyzed retrospectively disease response and outcome in 262 previously untreated stage D2 prostate cancer patients who received combination hormonal treatment (GnRH-A plus flutamide) using this aggressiveness score. Mean value of this aggressiveness score between patients who were grouped with reference to type of disease response according to the criteria established by the National Prostatic Cancer Project (NPCP) was statistically different (Kruskal-Wallis, p > 0.001). Pairwise comparison documented that this was true between all but the stable and progression groups. Linear regression analysis documented significant correlation of this aggressiveness score with length of response and survival (r = 0.59, and 0.45, respectively: p > 0.0001). Analysis of slopes obtained by linear regressions between aggressiveness score and survival in patients treated with GnRH-A plus flutamide and with GnRH-A monotherapy documented that disease response and outcome was superior among patients who received combination hormonal treatment. These data indicate that this aggressiveness score correlated well type of disease response, length of response, and survival with patients given combination hormonal treatment, and as such it can be used as an objective tool for analyzing clinical data.

Analysis of Variance↗