PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R T Paley

Publications and source records attributed to R T Paley.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Age and binocular advantage: A VEP assessment.

Monocular and binocular visual evoked potentials (VEP's) were recorded in response to contrast-reversing checkerboard patterns of 2 check sizes (14 and 28 min arc) and 2 contrast-reversal rates (1.88 and 7.50 rps) in children (10 and 11-year-olds) and young adults (20 to 30-year-olds). The magnitude of binocular advantage, expressed as the ratio of the binocular to the average monocular response, was assessed by amplitude measurements of the major positive peak. The overall VEP amplitudes were larger for children than for adults across all conditions. The VEP amplitudes for binocularly viewed patterns were also consistently larger than the VEP amplitudes for the monocularly viewed patterns for both age groups. However, when the binocular advantage was expressed as a ratio of binocular to monocular average (MAV), the amplitude difference between the age groups was no longer apparent; although the children's average VEP responses were of a larger amplitude, the binocular advantage remained the same regardless of age.

Adult↗

Nonlinearities in binocular visual evoked potentials in children.

Evidence is controversial in respect to the optimal conditions in which visual evoked potentials provide an objective measure of binocular visual function, related and unrelated to stereopsis, and there is little emphasis on the type of stimulus that produces facilitation in binocular recording. We investigated the effects of stimulus type (flicker or pattern), contrast, and temporal modulation on facilitation, which was defined as a binocular response greater than sum of monocular responses. Monocular and binocular responses to sinusoidally modulated flicker and grating patterns were recorded in children and Fourier analyzed. The relationship of the fundamental Fourier component for flicker and the second harmonic component for pattern were each examined as function of temporal modulation at two levels of contrast for monocular and binocular visual evoked potentials. Binocular facilitation was found across all conditions for flicker. Data suggest that processing of pattern and flicker has different sites of origin within the visual system. Facilitation in binocular visual evoked potentials also indicates that they are not a result of simple summation of monocular responses, since there appears a nonlinear component to such interaction.

Analysis of Variance↗