PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R T Penson

Publications and source records attributed to R T Penson.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Three sequential chemotherapy doublets for the treatment of newly diagnosed advanced müllerian malignancies: the modified triple doublet regimen.

OBJECTIVE: Previously, we reported the use of three sequential doublets (Triple Doublets) in the treatment of women with newly diagnosed and advanced stage müllerian malignancies. The surgically defined negative second look operation (SLO) rate to Triple Doublets was 38%. Modifications were made to this treatment regimen that were predicted to reduce toxicity and possibly increase efficacy. METHODS: Open label two-cohort study. Patients with a new diagnosis of Stages II-IV müllerian malignancy were eligible. After cytoreductive surgery, patients were treated with three sequential doublets including 3 cycles of carboplatin and gemcitabine, and 3 cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel, and 3 cycles of doxorubicin and topotecan. After therapy, all women were clinically staged and evaluated at SLO if clinical staging was negative for residual disease. Primary endpoints were toxicity and negative SLO rate with rates of 60% and 40% defined a priori in optimally cytoreduced (cohort 1) and suboptimally cytoreduced or Stage IV (cohort 2), respectively. RESULTS: Eighty-five eligible patients were enrolled with a median age of 52 years. Forty-seven and thirty-eight women were in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. 723 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered with no toxic deaths. Grades 3 and 4 toxicities included neutropenia in 75% of patients and thrombocytopenia in 65% of patients during at least one cycle of therapy. Fever and neutropenia were seen in 3.5% of patients. All Grades 3 and 4 non-hematologic toxicities were seen at a frequency of <10%. Seventy women underwent SLO with a negative SLO rate of 53% with an additional 9% having microscopically positive procedures. Negative SLO rate was 74% in cohort 1 and 36% in cohort 2. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with the modified triple doublet regimen is tolerable with an encouraging pathologic CR rate.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Phase I/II dose finding study of combination cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with recurrent cervix cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of cisplatin and gemcitabine in women with recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: A multi-institutional phase I/II dose finding study of cisplatin and gemcitabine delivered to women with recurrent previously radiated cervical carcinoma. RESULTS: Twenty eight patients were enrolled. The mean and median age of patients was 51 years (age range 35 to 70 years). Chemotherapy was given on a 28-day cycle; cisplatin was administered at a fixed dose of 50 mg/m(2), day 1 and gemcitabine, days 1, 8, and 15. Gemcitabine doses started at 600 mg/m(2) (dose level 1) and were escalated by 100 mg/m(2)/dose level until 1000 mg/m(2) (dose level 5). Twenty seven patients were evaluable for toxicity and disease response, and 75 cycles of chemotherapy were administered. Toxicities were predominantly hematological; 18% of patients experienced grade 3 anemia, 37% grade 3 and 11% grade 4 leukopenia, 41% grade 3 neutropenia, and 26% grade 3 thrombocytopenia. The maximally tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity on dose level 2 (febrile neutropenia). One patient had a CR and 3 patients had a PR to therapy (15% response rate), 41% of patients had SD, and 44% had progression of cancer. Median survival was 11.9 months. CONCLUSION: Although this 28-day gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen in recurrent cervix cancer has tolerable toxicity, 21-day regimens are recommended because of improved practicality, higher dose intensity, and higher response rates.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

A phase I clinical trial of continual alternating etoposide and topotecan in refractory solid tumours.

The goal of this phase I study was to develop a novel schedule using oral etoposide and infusional topotecan as a continually alternating schedule with potentially optimal reciprocal induction of the nontarget topoisomerase. The initial etoposide dose was 15 mg m(-2) b.i.d. days (D)1-5 weeks 1,3,5,7,9 and 11, escalated 5 mg per dose per dose level (DL). Topotecan in weeks 2,4,6,8,10 and 12 was administered by 96 h infusion at an initial dose of 0.2 mg m(-2) day(-1) with a dose escalation of 0.1, then at 0.05 mg m(-2) day(-1). Eligibility criteria required no organ dysfunction. Two dose reductions or delays were allowed. A total of 36 patients with a median age of 57 (22-78) years, received a median 8 (2-19) weeks of chemotherapy. At DL 6, dose-limiting toxicities consisted of grade 3 nausea, vomiting and intolerable fatigue. Three patients developed a line-related thrombosis or infection and one subsequently developed AML. There was no febrile neutropenia. There were six radiologically confirmed responses (18%) and 56% of patients demonstrated a response or stable disease, typically with only modest toxicity. Oral etoposide 35 mg m(-2) b.i.d. D1-5 and 1.8 mg m(-2) 96 h (total dose) infusional topotecan D8-11 can be administered on an alternating continual weekly schedule for at least 12 weeks, with promising clinical activity.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Attitudes to chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent ovarian cancer (OVCA) has become the model for cancer as a chronic disease, yet little is known about what motivates patients and physicians in treatment choices. METHODS: We investigated the attitudes of patients with epithelial OVCA and staff towards palliative chemotherapy for recurrent OVCA with a cross-sectional questionnaire study. RESULTS: Instruments were developed and piloted in 15 patients. This exploratory study reflects substantial bias in the sample populations. One hundred twenty-two patients and 37 staff were enrolled in the US and 39 patients and 25 staff were enrolled in the UK. UK patients had a lower educational status (P = 0.001), lower stage disease (P = 0.025), and less prior lines of chemotherapy (P < 0.001). 61% of patients had recurrent OVCA and 67% of staff were physicians. Seventy-three percent of patients recalled a discussion about prognosis and 74% wanted to know details of the prognosis for a typical patient (US = UK). Most patients (48%) thought that their physician was realistic, and 57% of staff felt that they were optimistic. The vast majority of both staff and patients thought that patients positively reinterpreted what they were told. Five percent of staff thought that palliative care was "incompatible" when considering chemotherapy as an option for their second recurrence of OVCA, compared with 36% of US patients, significantly more than the 12% of UK patients (P = 0.007). Patients thought that standard chemotherapy for a second recurrence of OVCA produced remission in 50% and cure in 15% of patients. Staff reported 20% and 0%, respectively. Fifty percent of patients and 57% of staff would want chemotherapy as an asymptomatic patient with a normal CT and a rising CA-125. Patients generally appear to be very tolerant of grade II chemotherapy-induced toxicity with staff being less tolerant than patients of nausea, anorexia, diarrhea, and rash. Staff rated life prolongation by 3 months to 1 year very much less acceptable than patients (P < 0.001). Although possibly allowing comprehensive collection of sensitive data, the questionnaire was too distressing for some patients and made 11% of patients feel uncomfortably anxious. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are optimistic and in the US, may be more reluctant than staff to see the Palliative Care Team. These data challenge the assertion that the use of palliative chemotherapy is physician-driven.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Paclitaxel resistance: molecular mechanisms and pharmacologic manipulation.

It has been approximately ten years since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved paclitaxel for the treatment of platinum resistant epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Since the approval, the drug has found therapeutic applications in a variety of schedules and in a wide variety of epithelial malignancies. Its novel mechanism of action provided the hope that it would demonstrate anti-neoplastic activity in multidrug resistant tumor cells. Unfortunately, as with other chemotherapeutic drugs, resistance is commonly seen. Laboratory investigation has defined a wide variety of resistance mechanisms including overexpression of multidrug resistance (MDR-1) gene, molecular changes in the target molecule (betatubulin), changes in apoptotic regulatory and mitosis checkpoint proteins, and more recently changes in lipid composition and potentially the overexpression of interleukin 6 (IL-6). This review describes the in vitro molecular data that define and support the various mechanisms of resistance and critically evaluates the evidence for the participation of these mechanisms in clinically relevant paclitaxel resistance. This review also explores pharmacologic attempts to modulate paclitaxel resistance, principally through inhibition of the MDR-1 drug efflux pump. Future avenues for drug resistance research and its pharmacologic manipulation in the clinic are discussed.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2002

Overexpression of IL-6 but not IL-8 increases paclitaxel resistance of U-2OS human osteosarcoma cells.

The cytokines IL-6, initially recognized as a regulator of immune and inflammatory response and IL-8, a potential regulator of angiogenesis, also regulate the growth of many tumor cells. Human cancer cells selected for multidrug resistance to common chemotherapeutic agents demonstrate increased expression of IL-6 and IL-8. To determine whether IL-6 or IL-8 overexpression contributes directly to the drug resistant phenotype, IL-6 or IL-8 cDNA were introduced into the paclitaxel sensitive human osteosarcoma cell line U-2OS using the pIRESneo bicistronic expression vector. Interleukin-6 and IL-8 transfectants were selected for either high IL-6 or IL-8 secretion and evaluated in drug resistance assays. Two IL-6 and two IL-8 secreting clones express IL-6 or IL-8 levels of 10 ng/ml and 1 ng/ml in culture, while parental U-2OS and pIRESneo vector transfected control cells express IL-6 and IL-8 levels of 0.005 ng/ml and 0.1 ng/ml, respectively. MTT cytotoxicity with IL-6 transfected cells demonstrates a five-fold increase in resistance to paclitaxel and a four-fold increase in resistance to doxorubicin as compared to U-2OS. There are no changes in mitoxantrone or topotecan resistance in the IL-6 transfectants as compared to parental U-2OS. Northern analysis of IL-6 transfectants demonstrates that the resistant phenotype is not related to increased levels of MDR-1, MRP-1, or LRP. Western analysis also confirms that P-glycoprotein levels are not altered in IL-6 transfectants. Further supporting an MDR-1 independent mechanism of drug resistance, verapamil cannot reverse paclitaxel resistance in transfected cells, findings further supported by rhodamine 123 exclusion data. Treatment of IL-6 transfected cells with paclitaxel, compared with drug-sensitive parental U-2OS, shows U-2OS(IL-6) are significantly more resistant to apoptosis induced by paclitaxel and exhibit decreased proteolytic activation of caspase-3. In contrast U-2OS(IL-8) transfectants demonstrate no appreciable increase in paclitaxel resistance when compared with parental cells. In summary, while both IL-6 and IL-8 are overexpressed in paclitaxel resistant cell lines, only IL-6 has the potential to contribute directly to paclitaxel and doxorubicin resistance in U-2OS. This resistance is through a non-MDR-1 pathway.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗
PubMed2001

A Phase I-II study of 96-hour infusional topotecan and paclitaxel for patients with recurrent Müllerian tumors.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan and paclitaxel are schedule dependent chemotherapeutic agents with activity against ovarian carcinoma. A Phase I-II study in which both drugs were administered concurrently by 96-hour, continuous, intravenous infusion was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of the combination. METHODS: Women with ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma and documented recurrent disease were eligible for the study. The dose of topotecan was escalated from 1.6 mg/m(2) while maintaining the paclitaxel dose constant at 100 mg/m(2). Plasma concentrations of both drugs were monitored daily during the first cycle of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with a median age of 54 years (range, 42-70 years) received 181 cycles of therapy. Five patients were recruited to each of four dose levels (topotecan 1.6 mg/m(2), 2.0 mg/m(2), 2.8 mg/m(2), and 3.6 mg/m(2)), and an additional 25 patients were treated at the MTD (Phase II). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia became dose limiting toxicities (DLT) at the fourth dose level. Emesis, mucositis, peripheral neuropathy, diarrhea, and alopecia were mild. Twenty patients (44%) had line-related occlusion, thrombosis, or infection. The mean values (+/- standard deviation) of the apparent steady-state plasma concentrations at the Phase II doses were 2.3 nM +/- 0.5 nM for topotecan lactone, 5.6 nM +/- 2.1 nM for total topotecan, and 40.1 nM +/- 16.8 nM for paclitaxel. There were seven partial responses (Phase II) contributing to an objective response rate of 28% and a median survival time of 11.7 months (range, 0.6-20.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: Topotecan at a dose of 2.8 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel at a dose of 100 mg/m(2) administered by concurrent, 96-hour, continuous intravenous infusions shows activity against tumors of Müllerian origin.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Limited phase I study of morphine-3-glucuronide.

The toxicity of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) has been investigated in an open, uncontrolled, single-blinded, single dose study over a limited range of doses. Three cohorts each of three healthy volunteers received 7.5, 15, and 30 mg/70 kg intravenous (IV) M3G. Blood sampling was undertaken for the following 24 h. Subjective toxicity was recorded on visual analogue scales and plasma M3G concentrations measured by a specific HPLC assay. Virtually no effects and no change in cardiovascular or respiratory parameters were seen. The pharmacokinetics fitted a two-compartment model. The mean elimination half-life (+/- S.D.) of M3G was 1.66 (+/- 0.47) h. Mean AUC standardized to a dose of 1 mg/70 kg was 228 (+/- 62) etamolL(-1) x h. Mean M3G clearance was 169 (+/- 48) mLmin(-1) and the mean volume of distribution was 23.1 (+/- 4.8) liters. At the doses investigated there were no clear neuroexcitatory effects, no opioid effects, and the pharmacokinetics were very similar to those of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G).

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The clinical utility of liposomal doxorubicin in recurrent ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of single agent off-protocol, liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil Alza), in consecutive patients with recurrent ovarian cancer and to investigate the influence of HER-2/neu expression on response to liposomal doxorubicin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 72 consecutive patients treated, typically with liposomal doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2) q28 days between January 1997 and December 1998. Results. Twenty-nine patients (40%) had platinum- and taxane-resistant tumors. Nineteen patients (27%) responded with clinical or radiological evidence of response with reduction in CA-125 of >50%. One complete response (CR) and 7 partial responses (PRs) occurred in platinum- and taxane-resistant patients (radiological response (RR) 29%) and 8 PRs occurred in patients with visceral metastases (RR 28%). Time to progression was 5.3 (2.1-12.1) months. Only 7 dose delays (3%) and 20 dose reductions (8%) were necessary in 265 cycles of treatment. Hematological toxicity was generally mild with grade (Gr) > or =III neutropenia in 1 (2%), Gr > or =III thrombocytopenia in 1 (1%), and Gr > or =III anemia in 8 patients (11%). One patient (1%) was admitted with fever and neutropenia. Other toxicity was minimal with Gr > or =III mucositis occurring in 3 patients (4%). Gr > or =III cutaneous toxicity was seen in 6 patients (8%). Three patients (4%) had a >10% fall in ejection fraction but there was no unequivocal clinical heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that liposomal doxorubicin is an active drug in both taxane- and platinum-sensitive and resistant recurrent ovarian cancer. Liposomal doxorubicin is associated with tolerable toxicity and is particularly well tolerated in patients with multiple prior lines of treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

A phase II study of combined intravenous and subcutaneous interleukin-2 in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

A total of 29 previously untreated patients with histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma, with an ECOG score of < or = 2 and UICC stage I-II disease, were enrolled between May 1994 and October 1996. On days 1 and 2, 18 x 10(6) IU/day of rIL-2 was administered by continuous intravenous infusion, and 6 x 10(6) IU/day of rIL-2 by subcutaneous injection on days 5--20 inclusive of a 42-day cycle. Further treatment was administered if no radiological disease progression was demonstrated. A total of 29 patients were assessable for toxicity and 25 for response, and 49 cycles of IL-2 were administered with a median of one per patient (range, < 1-4). Toxicity included mild fever, nausea and vomiting, and skin rashes, < grade II. Three patients failed to complete one cycle of treatment because of toxicity and one died of disease before response evaluation. Two patients achieved a partial response (8%, 95% CI 1-26%) surviving 18.1 and 18.7 months from diagnosis. A total of 11 patients (44%, 95% CI 24-65%) with stable disease had a median survival of 13.6 months (range 6.5-33.8). The median survival was 8.6 months (range 3.7-34.5) for the 12 patients with progressive disease (48%, 95% CI 28-69%). This regimen of rIL-2 is well tolerated and shows limited activity in mesothelioma.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Medical mistakes: a workshop on personal perspectives.

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center at MGH. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and sustenance to the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Medical errors are difficult to discuss. Significant medical errors occur in approximately 3% of hospitalizations. Two-thirds are preventable. Despite an entrenched belief that doctors should be infallible, errors are inevitable. Dr. Wendy Levinson of the University of Chicago facilitated a discussion of the impact medical errors have on staff. Staff broke into small groups to share their personal experience and then discussed common themes: the sense of shame and guilt, the punitive culture, guidelines for disclosure to patients and colleagues, and changes in medical practice that can prevent future mistakes. Auditing and improving systems has led to considerable improvements in the field of aviation safety. However, in medicine people are more important than the process. While we should never cease to aim for the very best in delivered care, we must acknowledge how prone we all are to mistakes and that we can learn from and prevent errors. Openly sharing experiences in a confidential setting, such as the Schwartz Rounds, helps defuse feelings of guilt and challenges the culture of shame and isolation that often surrounds medical errors. The Oncologist 2001;6:92-99

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed2001

Caring for colleagues.

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and sustenance to the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Caring for colleagues who develop cancer is a privilege woven with an extra dimension-caregiver-patient issues. As well as stretching the usual need for a supportive relationship, when one of the health care team develops cancer it particularly provokes concerns about our own mortality. The case is presented of a well-known physician who developed a second cancer and has been cared for at the MGH Cancer Center Staff discuss her care as it has been effected by her status as a colleague. They perceived unique barriers to optimal care such as assumptions about the patient's level of medical knowledge, and technical, informational, emotional, and hierarchical issues that may obstruct the development of a trusting relationship between caregivers and the physician/patient. Emotional stress may prevent the sharing of an accurate prognosis. In the case under consideration, the patient had a frank and open attitude to her cancer yet her caregivers were concerned about continual breeches of patient confidentiality. Despite the many potential problems inherent when the caregiver becomes the patient, this case discussion was a poignant reminder of the unique challenges of every experience with cancer and the weighty privilege of being involved with patient care.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed2001

Losing God.

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and sustenance to the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Nebulous language, distrust, and dogma confound spiritual aspects of cancer care. However, existential well being is an important determinant of quality of life: finding meaning and purpose make suffering more tolerable. The case presented is of a patient who experienced "losing God" as a Hodgkin's disease survivor with metastatic prostate cancer and severe coronary artery disease. His caregivers were able to provide the sense of community in which he could re-establish his faith. Health care providers do not have to be religious in order to help patients to deal with a spiritual crisis. The clinical skills of compassion need to be deployed to diagnose and respond to spiritual suffering. Acknowledging and addressing anger or guilt, common sources of suffering, are essential to adjustment. Simply being there for the patient and being open to their hurt can help resolve their spiritual crisis, a responsibility that is shared by the whole health care team.

Hodgkin Disease↗
PubMed2001

Complementary, alternative, integrative, or unconventional medicine?

Shortly before his death in 1995, Kenneth B. Schwartz, a cancer patient at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH), founded the Kenneth B. Schwartz Center. The Schwartz Center is a non-profit organization dedicated to supporting and advancing compassionate health care delivery, which provides hope to the patient, support to caregivers, and sustenance to the healing process. The center sponsors the Schwartz Center Rounds, a monthly multidisciplinary forum where caregivers reflect on important psychosocial issues faced by patients, their families, and their caregivers, and gain insight and support from fellow staff members. Interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) has grown exponentially in the past decade, fueled by Internet marketing, dissatisfaction with mainstream medicine, and a desire for patients to be actively involved in their health care. There is a large discordance between physician estimates and reported prevalence of CAM use. Many patients do not disclose their practices mainly because they believe CAM falls outside the rubric of conventional medicine or because physicians do not ask. Concern about drug interactions and adverse effects are compounded by a lack of Food and Drug Administration regulation. Physicians need to be informed about CAM and be attuned to the psychosocial needs of patients.

Caregivers↗
PubMed2000

Randomized placebo-controlled trial of the activity of the morphine glucuronides.

BACKGROUND: Morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) is an active metabolite of morphine with potent analgesic activity. Morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G), the most prevalent metabolite, has minimal affinity for opioid receptors. It has been suggested from animal model data and by examination of metabolite ratios in humans that M3G may functionally antagonize the respiratory depressant and analgesic actions of morphine and M6G. METHODS: We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled trial with 10 healthy volunteers. The trial had 6 arms: (1) placebo, (2) 10 mg/70 kg of morphine, (3) 3.3 mg/70 kg of M6G, (4) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G, (5) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G with 10 mg/70 kg of morphine, and (6) 30.6 mg/70 kg of M3G with 3.3 mg/70 kg of M6G; all were give by slow intravenous bolus. Analgesia was assessed with the use of the submaximal ischemic pain model. The effects were quantified on numerical and visual analogue scales. Respiratory parameters and response to steady state 5% carbon dioxide challenge were assessed with spirometry, mass spectroscopy, and earlobe blood gas analysis. RESULTS: Morphine and M6G produced significant pain relief compared with placebo (morphine, P < .0001; M6G, P = .033). Pain relief after M6G was less than after morphine (P = .009) and M3G was no better than placebo (P = .26). Pain relief with morphine and M6G were not significantly altered by M3G (P = .59 and P = .28, respectively). Significant and similar dysphoria and sedation occurred with both morphine (P < .002) and M6G (P < .016) but were absent with both M3G and placebo. Respiratory parameters suggested that M6G produced less respiratory depression than morphine. Both morphine and M6G caused a significant reduction in respiratory drive compared with placebo (morphine, P = .002; M6G, P = .013); this effect was not reversed by M3G (P = .35 and P = .83, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: M3G appears to be devoid of significant activity; in these circumstances and at these doses, it does not antagonize either the analgesic or respiratory depressant effects of M6G or morphine.

Adult↗