PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R T Reichman

Publications and source records attributed to R T Reichman.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Comparison of continuous with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output measurements.

BACKGROUND: Few complete studies have been published to validate the agreement between continuous cardiac output and intermittent thermodilution cardiac output. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the agreement between cardiac output measurements by the continuous thermodilution method and the intermittent bolus thermodilution method, using a continuous cardiac output catheter in postoperative cardiothoracic surgery patients. METHODS: A convenience sample of 14 adult cardiothoracic surgical patients with thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters placed preoperatively was used. A total of 214 comparison measurements of cardiac output by both the continuous and intermittent thermodilution methods were taken on patient admission to the critical care unit, every 4 hours, and with any change greater than 10% from baseline readings. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation between continuous cardiac output and intermittent cardiac output was .89. The limits of agreement were -1.34 to 1.18 L/min, indicating that in 95% of readings the difference between continuous cardiac output and intermittent cardiac output were within this range. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous cardiac output monitoring method shows clinically acceptable agreement with the intermittent cardiac output method.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Improved patient survival after cardiac arrest using a cardiopulmonary support system.

A portable cardiopulmonary bypass system that can be rapidly deployed in a nonsurgical setting using nursing staff was used in 38 patients with cardiovascular collapse refractory to ACLS protocol. Percutaneous or cutdown cannulation sites were: femoral vein-femoral artery (n = 18), right internal jugular vein-femoral artery (n = 2), right atrium-ascending aorta (n = 12), or a combination approach (n = 4). Two patients could not be cannulated. Patient diagnoses were pulmonary emboli (n = 3), failed coronary angioplasty (n = 7), myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock (n = 5), trauma (n = 7), aortic stenosis (n = 2), postcardiotomy deterioration (n = 10), deterioration after cardiac transplantation (n = 2), cardiomyopathy with shock (n = 1), and ruptured ascending aortic dissection (n = 1). Ninety-five percent of patients (36 of 38) were successfully resuscitated to a stable rhythm. Eight diagnostic procedures (coronary angiography, n = 4; pulmonary angiography, n = 3; and aortography, n = 1) were performed while patients were on cardiopulmonary support. Early deaths resulted from massive hemorrhage (n = 8), inability to cannulate (n = 2), and irreversible myocardial injury (n = 10). Sixty-six percent (24 of 36) of patients successfully cannulated underwent conversion to standard cardiopulmonary bypass with attendant operative procedure or placement of ventricular assist device or total artificial heart. Fifty percent (18 of 36) of patients cannulated were successfully weaned from cardiopulmonary support, and 17% (6/36) are long-term survivors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Comparison of myocardial temperatures with multidose cardioplegia versus single-dose cardioplegia and myocardial surface cooling during coronary artery bypass grafting.

Myocardial hypothermia with multidose cardioplegia has not been compared with single-dose cardioplegia and myocardial surface cooling with a cooling jacket in patients having coronary artery bypass grafting. In this study, 20 patients with three-vessel disease undergoing coronary bypass at 28 degrees C with bicaval cannulation, caval tapes, and pulmonary artery venting (4.9 +/- 0.7 grafts per patient) were prospectively randomized equally into group I (multidose cardioplegia) and group II (single-dose cardioplegia with a cooling jacket). The initial dose of cardioplegic solution was 1000 ml. Group I then received 500 ml of cardioplegic solution every 20 minutes, delivered into the aortic root and available grafts. In group II, after the cardioplegic solution had been administered, a cooling jacket covering the right and left ventricles was applied. In both groups temperatures were recorded every 30 seconds at five ventricular sites: (1) right ventricular epicardium; (2) right ventricular myocardium or cavity, 7 mm; (3) left ventricular epicardium; (4) left ventricular myocardium or cavity, 15 mm; and (5) septum, 20 mm. Group mean temperatures at each site at various times were compared within each group and between the two groups by analysis of variance. Aortic crossclamp time was 60.3 +/- 12.1 minutes in group I and 52.8 +/- 7.3 minutes in group II (p = 0.12); cardiopulmonary bypass time was 103.7 +/- 11.1 minutes in group I versus 87.7 +/- 12.7 minutes in group II (p less than 0.01). One minute after the cardioplegic solution was initially given, temperatures between groups at each site were not statistically different, but left ventricular epicardial temperatures within both groups were significantly higher than in the other four sites. Nineteen minutes after administration of the cardioplegic solution, temperatures in group I at all sites were higher than in group II. Similarly, throughout the entire period of aortic crossclamping, mean temperatures (except left ventricular myocardial site), maximum temperatures, and percentage of time all temperatures were 15 degrees C or higher were greater in group I than in group II. The following conclusions can be reached: 1. Initial myocardial cooling with 1000 ml of cardioplegic solution is not significantly limited by coronary artery disease but is suboptimal (16 degrees or 17 degrees C) in the inferior left ventricular epicardium because of continual warming from the aorta and subdiaphragmatic viscera. 2. Without myocardial surface cooling, excessive external myocardial rewarming to 18 degrees to 22 degrees C occurs within 20 minutes at all sites after delivery of the cardioplegic solution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Mechanical support: assist or nemesis?

Our 6-year experience with ventricular assist devices was reviewed to determine variables associated with improved survival. Forty-three patients (mean age 62 +/- 14 years) were supported after balloon pumping and pressors proved inadequate. Twenty-eight patients could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, 12 patients deteriorated in the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery, and three had a bridged to transplantation. Overall, 47% (20/43) of patients could not be weaned from the ventricular assist devices, and 26% (11/43) were weaned but died before discharge, resulting in a hospital mortality rate of 72% (31/43). The remaining 28% (12/43) of patients were discharged and have survived 9 to 62 months. Early institution of ventricular assist devices (p less than 0.01), use of biventricular support (p less than 0.01), use of ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation (p less than 0.05), and increased operator experience (p less than 0.05) were associated with improved survival. When patient and disease-related variables were analyzed, only age less than 60 years (p less than 0.01) and unexpectedly preoperative myocardial infarction associated with shock (p less than 0.05) were related to improved survival. Death was caused by insufficient ventricular recovery, stroke, multiple organ system failure, sepsis, or a combination of these complications. During long-term follow-up, two patients have died of congestive heart failure, and one is significantly impaired from a stroke. Two other patients are functional class III and seven patients are class I. Although hospital mortality was high (72%), the use of ventricular assist device support resulted in overall "long-term" survival of a significant percentage (28%) of patients, 47% (8/17), in the past 12 months, all of whom would have died without it. Therefore we currently recommend a trial of ventricular assist devices support for most patients who fail to be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass, deteriorate in the perioperative period, and as a bridge to transplantation. Long-term survival is determined by the complications from ventricular assist devices support and functional status of the remaining myocardium.

Age Factors↗