PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R T Salzman

Publications and source records attributed to R T Salzman.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Can a controlled-release oral dose form of oxycodone be used as readily as an immediate-release form for the purpose of titrating to stable pain control?

Two separate trials compared controlled-release (CR) oral oxycodone (administered every 12 hours) with immediate-release (IR) oxycodone (4 times a day) to determine whether patients with chronic pain could be titrated to stable pain control as readily with the CR as with the IR formulation. In one study, 48 patients with cancer pain were randomized to open-label titration with either CR or IR oxycodone (maximum dose, 400 mg/day) for a period of up to 21 days. In a study of similar design, 57 patients with low back pain were titrated with either CR or IR oxycodone (maximum dose, 80 mg/day) for a period of up to 10 days. The majority of patients in both studies were converted to oxycodone from other opioid analgesics. Results of both studies showed no difference between CR and IR oxycodone with respect to both the percentage of patients achieving stable pain control, the time to achieve stable pain control, and the degree of pain control achieved. Among cancer patients, 85% achieved stable analgesia, 92% with the CR formulation and 79% with the IR formulation. Among noncancer patients, 91% achieved stable pain control, 87% with the CR formulation and 96% with the IR formulation. The most commonly reported adverse effects in both studies were similar for the two formulations and were those anticipated with opioids: nausea, vomiting, constipation, somnolence, dizziness, and pruritus. Nausea and vomiting were the most frequently cited reasons for treatment discontinuations. These studies suggest that dose titration can be accomplished as readily with oral CR oxycodone as with IR oxycodone in patients with chronic, moderate to severe pain.

Adult↗

Long-term comparison of suprofen and propoxyphene in patients with osteoarthritis.

The analgesic efficacy and safety of suprofen, 200 mg q.i.d., and propoxyphene, 65 mg q.i.d., were compared in 114 patients with chronic pain due to osteoarthritis. Both analgesic agents decreased pain intensity after only 1 week of treatment and considerable pain relief was apparent by week 2 to week 3 of treatment. These beneficial effects persisted with long-term therapy and improvement continued throughout the 24-week treatment period. Overall, the response to suprofen and propoxyphene was good to excellent in most of the patients treated. Long-term administration of suprofen was at least as well tolerated as that of propoxyphene. Only 24% (13 of 55) of suprofen-treated patients and 34% (20 of 59) of propoxyphene-treated patients discontinued therapy, primarily due to gastrointestinal complaints. It was concluded that suprofen, 200 mg q.i.d., is comparable in terms of efficacy to propoxyphene, 65 mg q.i.d., in relieving pain due to osteoarthritis.

Aged↗

Long-term, double-blind randomized parallel group studies comparing fenbufen and indomethacin in patients with osteoarthritis.

A controlled trial was designed to compare both the long-term efficacy and the safety of fenbufen and indomethacin in patients with osteoarthritis. One hundred and ten patients of both sexes (aged 33 to 79 years) who had both subjective and objective (including radiological) evidence of osteoarthritis, and who met the minimal entry criteria, were enrolled into the studies. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either fenbufen capsules b.i.d. (600-1000 mg/day) or identical appearing indomethacin capsules b.i.d. (750-125 mg/day). Thirty-seven fenbufen and 26 indomethacin patients completed twelve months of treatment. Both fenbufen and indomethacin provided statistically nd clinically significant improvement at months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12. There were no significant differences in improvement between the two treatment groups. Fenbufen-treated patients, however, reported fewer occurrences (4) of severe drug-related adverse experiences than indomethacin-treated patients (20). Significantly fewer headaches were reported with fenbufen and the number of patients terminating treatment because of adverse experiences was significantly greater with indomethacin. Fenbufen, in this patient population, provided a superior ratio of benefits to risk for the long-term treatment of osteoarthritis.U

Adult↗