The 2002/3 Canadian Cardiovascular Society consensus guideline update for the diagnosis and management of heart failure.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to R Tsuyuki.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
AIMS: In addition to diabetes mellitus, less severe abnormalities of glucose and insulin metabolism may be related to functional status in patients with heart failure. We examined the relationship of hyperglycaemia (> or =6.1 mmol. l(-1)) and hyperinsulinaemia (> or =11.2 mU. l(-1)) to functional status and cardiac function in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels were obtained in 663 heart failure patients. The average left ventricular ejection fraction was 0.28+/-0.07, 63% were in New York Heart Association Functional Class (NYHA-FC) I/II and 37% were in NYHA-FC III/IV. Twenty seven percent had diabetes mellitus, but an additional 8% had undiagnosed diabetes mellitus (glucose > or =7 mmol. l(-1)) and 9% had glucose levels between 6.1 and 7 mmol. l(-1), so that a total of 43% (287) of patients had elevated glucose levels (> or =6.1 mmol. l(-1)). In general, more diabetic patients had NYHA-FC III/IV symptoms, shorter 6 min walk distances, but similar left ventricular ejection fractions compared to non-diabetic patients. The non-diabetic patients in NYHA-FC III/IV had higher glucose and insulin levels than patients in NYHA-FC I/II (6.3+/-0.2 vs 5.6+/-0.1 mmol. l(-1), P<0.001 and 19.6+/-2.3 vs 10. 2+/-0.6 mU. l(-1), P<0.001). Non-diabetic patients with elevated glucose levels had shorter 6 min walk distances compared to those with normal glucose levels (368.2+/-8 m vs 389.+/-4 m, P=0.02), however, left ventricular ejection fraction was similar. CONCLUSION: Glucose abnormalities are extremely common in heart failure patients (43% of patients). Diabetes mellitus and hyperglycaemia or hyperlinsulinaemia in non-diabetic patients were related to worse symptomatic status but not worsening left ventricular ejection fraction compared to patients with normal glucose and insulin levels.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To offer an attributive opinion of recent improvements in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) practice patterns and patient outcomes in the culture of an active health care research program. DATA SOURCES: Review of original clinical data from five sequential, consecutively enrolled, AMI patient cohorts at the University of Alberta Hospitals from 1987-93. DATA SYNTHESIS: Early cohorts had low use of trial-proven efficacious therapies for AMI, particularly among high risk older and female patients. Over time, there were continuous and marked increases in the use of efficacious therapies and decreased use of nonefficacious therapies, with a parallel decrease in mortality among high risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: In a large tertiary care hospital between 1987 and 1993 the use of evidence-based AMI therapy and survival in high risk patients significantly increased. The continuity and large size of these improvements in AMI practice patterns, compared with similar populations reported in the contemporary literature, suggest it is unlikely they were due to chance. Rather, intercurrent repeated measurement and reporting of key health care performance indicators, and initiation of explicit critical path AMI practice guidelines provide a more likely explanation. Future studies by a network of community and university investigators will test whether these findings are true for a broad AMI population and whether similar practice definition and improvement tools are effective for other cardiac problems, including the management of congestive heart failure.
OBJECTIVE: Atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD) continues to be the dominant disease in Western society. A large body of evidence directly linking serum cholesterol levels and CHD risk has stimulated population treatment strategies designed to reduce cholesterol and CHD risk. Data indicating a relation between low cholesterol and non-CHD risk have, however, suggested that cholesterol reduction may not always be desirable. The primary goal of this evaluative review of the available evidence was to answer the following question: Is prevention/regression therapy for CHD safe and effective? DATA SOURCES: Three lines of evidence were reviewed: epidemiologic studies; primary and secondary prevention trials with clinical end points; and secondary prevention trials with quantitative coronary angiography as a surrogate end point for clinical CHD. STUDY SELECTION: Original studies and meta-analyses were reviewed. The principal selection criteria for the epidemiologic studies were large size and prolonged follow-up; for the trials, randomization and viable clinical (CHD events, CHD mortality, total mortality) or angiographic end points. DATA EXTRACTION: The data were initially extracted by a single reviewer using common qualitative guidelines. The data were then evaluated by all authors acting as a data interpretation team. DATA SYNTHESIS: Overall, the epidemiologic data revealed excess risk of fatal and nonfatal CHD events was directly related to total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels, for both men and women and for both younger (< 65 years) and older (> or = 65 years) patients, over a wide range of serum cholesterol levels. The predictive value was higher in younger men than older men and women, although part of this quantitative interaction may be due to fewer studies, with fewer end points, in the older and female populations. The CHD events and CHD mortality, but not total mortality, were consistently reduced in trials of cholesterol-lowering therapy. The regression trials, predominantly in CHD patients with high cholesterol values (mean 7.1 mmol/L), demonstrated improvement in angiographic atherosclerosis in every study. The evidence for elevated risk of non-CHD death at very low levels of cholesterol is uncertain and controversial. The most likely possibilities for this apparent relationship are unknown confounding variables and the play of chance. CONCLUSIONS: Serum cholesterol levels are directly associated with CHD risk, and there is no threshold level below which there is no risk. Reduction of high serum cholesterol levels reduces CHD risk. Whether lipid-lowering and adjunctive antiatherosclerotic therapies are effective and safe in the majority of CHD patients who have desirable or borderline cholesterol levels remains undetermined.
In the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) study, use of the angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor ramipril was associated with a 22% relative risk reduction in cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, despite only a modest reduction in blood pressure (23.3 mm Hg systolic). To test the hypothesis that the benefits seen were not due to reduced blood pressure alone, we calculated blood-pressure-related risk estimates from the placebo group of the HOPE trial, and from earlier studies. We found that the benefits seen in HOPE were around three times greater than predicted from these calculations. In this well treated and largely normotensive population with coronary disease, but good left-ventricular function, the benefits from ramipril were additive to other proven therapies in normotensive patients and in those with higher baseline blood pressure.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.