PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Vargo

Publications and source records attributed to R Vargo.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

Exercise performance and chronotropic response in heart failure patients with implantable left ventricular assist devices.

During metabolic stress testing, 9 of 20 patients with left ventricular assist devices exhibited a lag in peak device rate by < or = 85% of peak native heart rate (group I), with peak device rates of 118 +/- 9 beats/min compared with group II, in which peak device rate nearly equaled peak native rates. Peak systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in group II than group I, but there was no significant difference in peak oxygen consumption, anaerobic threshold, or peak flows.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Effect of the implantable left ventricular assist device on neuroendocrine activation in heart failure.

BACKGROUND: The HeartMate left ventricular assist device has been successfully used as a bridge to cardiac transplantation. Because many patients exhibit marked clinical improvement in their heart failure after HeartMate implantation, we studied the physiological effect of this device on the neurohormonal axis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 13 patients awaiting transplant (mean cardiac index, 1.7 +/- 0.3 L.min-1.m-2) who underwent HeartMate implantation, venous atrial natriuretic peptide, epinephrine, norepinephrine, plasma renin activity, angiotensin, and arginine vasopressin were measured immediately before insertion and at explant/transplantation. Mean time to explant was 86 +/- 40 days. All patients were taken off inotropic medications within 1 month. Mean cardiac index on support before explant was 3.1 +/- 0.9 L.min-1.m-2. Plasma renin activity decreased from 57 +/- 56 ng.mL-1.h-1 at baseline (before insertion) to 3 +/- 3 ng.mL-1.h-1 at explant (mean percent change, 92%; P < .001). Angiotensin II level decreased from 237 +/- 398 U/L at baseline to 14 +/- 14 U/L at explant (mean percent change, 73%; P < .001). Plasma epinephrine level fell from 6800 +/- 1323 pg/mL at baseline to 46 +/- 46 pg/mL at explant (mean percent change, 86%; P < .001). Norepinephrine level decreased from 2953 +/- 1457 pg/mL at baseline to 518 +/- 290 pg/mL at explant (mean percent change, 79%; P < .001). Atrial natriuretic peptide fell from baseline values of 227 +/- 196 to 168 +/- 40 pg/mL at explant (mean percent change, -49%; P = 519); and arginine vasopressin level decreased from 6 +/- 6 pg/mL at baseline to 0.8 +/- 0.5 pg/mL (mean percent change, 69%; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: We provide data supporting that the neurohormonal axis markedly improves after HeartMate implantation, providing biochemical confirmation of the improvement in hemodynamic status.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Structural and left ventricular histologic changes after implantable LVAD insertion.

Long-term support on the implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) produces structural changes in the recipient's heart. To assess the possibility of heart "recovery" we reviewed the records of 19 HeartMate LVAD recipients to determine structural and left ventricular histologic changes during LVAD support. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic studies were performed in the operating room before LVAD insertion, immediately after LVAD insertion, and at explantation and heart transplantation (mean duration of support, 76 +/- 34 days). The initiation of LVAD pumping led to an immediate decrease (p < 0.001) in left ventricular dimensions, which were not significantly different by the time of device explantation. Left ventricular fractional shortening did not significantly improve during LVAD support (0.07 +/- 0.03 before LVAD; 0.11 +/- 0.10 immediately after LVAD; 0.11 +/- 0.11 before explantation). Histologic specimens showed a significant reduction in the number of wavy fibers, and contraction band necrosis (p < 0.01), both markers of acute myocyte damage. However, myocardial fibrosis increased (p < 0.05). Myocyte diameter increased slightly (p = 0.07). We conclude that implantable LVAD support is associated with immediate changes in ventricular structure. Histologic markers of acute myocyte damage improve, but fibrosis increases. Because the structural changes occur immediately, they do not indicate "recovery" of left ventricular function, but merely changes in loading conditions.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Hemodynamic and physiologic changes during support with an implantable left ventricular assist device.

To evaluate hemodynamic effectiveness and physiologic changes on the HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc., Woburn, Mass.), we studied 25 patients undergoing bridge to heart transplantation (35 to 63 years old, mean 50 years). All were receiving inotropic agents before left ventricular assist device implantation, 21 (84%) were supported with a balloon pump, and 7 (28%) were supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Six patients died, primarily of right ventricular dysfunction and multiple organ failure. Nineteen (76%) were rehabilitated, received a donor heart, and were discharged (100% survival after transplantation). Pretransplantation duration of support averaged 76 days (22 to 153 days). No thromboembolic events occurred in more than 1500 patient-days of support with only antiplatelet medications. Significant hemodynamic improvement was measured (before implantation to before explantation) in cardiac index (1.7 +/- 0.3 to 3.1 +/- 0.8 L/min per square meter; p < 0.001), left atrial pressure (23.7 +/- 7 to 9 +/- 7.5 mm Hg; p < 0.001), pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Both creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels were significantly higher before implantation in patients who died while receiving support. Renal and liver function returned to normal before transplantation. We conclude that support with the HeartMate device improved hemodynamic and subsystem function before transplantation. Long-term support with the HeartMate device has a low risk of thromboemboli and makes a clinical trial of a portable HeartMate device a realistic alternative to medical therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Late reconstruction of the midfoot and tarsometatarsal region after trauma.

The management of painful arthritis and deformity after trauma to the midfoot starts with careful assessment by physical examination and appropriate investigation to identify the affected joints. Conservative treatment may be very effective and includes the use of NSAIDs, custom insoles with arch support, and a rocker-bottom sole with extended steel shank with or without a SACH heel. If this treatment fails, usually a year after the injury, then arthrodesis of all the symptomatic joints with restoration of the arch and alignment of the weight-bearing surface is the recommended treatment. The long-term results of these fusions may be compromised by the subsequent development of arthritis in adjacent joints.

Arthrodesis↗
PubMed1994

Preperitoneal insertion of the HeartMate 1000 IP implantable left ventricular assist device.

During a 16-month period, 12 consecutive patients underwent insertion of a HeartMate 1000 IP left ventricular assist device in a preperitoneal pocket that separated the device from the abdomen. All patients were in cardiogenic shock awaiting heart transplantation. Preoperatively, the mean cardiac index was 1.6 L.min-1.m-2, with 11 patients on intraaortic balloon pump support and 2 on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. The pocket was formed below the rectus abdominis and internal oblique muscles and above the posterior rectus sheath. The pump fit easily in all patients. One patient died of progressive multiorgan failure. Four patients are still on support. Seven patients underwent successful transplantation after a mean duration of 55 days of support (mean pump index was 3.1 L.min-1.m-2 during support). One patient had driveline revision because of an exit site infection but had successful transplantation. The pump was explanted without difficulty at each transplant operation. All patients having transplantation are alive and well. Preperitoneal insertion of the HeartMate left ventricular assist device can be safely performed and may avoid problems posed by intraabdominal left ventricular assist device insertion.

Abdominal Muscles↗
PubMed1994

Implantable left ventricular assist device. Approaching an alternative for end-stage heart failure. Implantable LVAD Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was designed to provide circulatory support as an alternative to heart transplantation or to continued medical therapy of end-stage heart failure. Initial experience with the implantable LVAD used as a bridge to heart transplantation provides a clinical opportunity to study the function of the device and adaptation by the patient. METHODS AND RESULTS: Nineteen heart transplant candidates (mean age, 50 years; 17 males) underwent insertion of the HeartMate LVAD as a bridge to heart transplantation from December 1991 to November 1993. All patients were in cardiogenic shock on inotropes, and 16 (84%) were on an intra-aortic balloon pump. Three patients died because of multiple organ failure; all had right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (2 required RV assist devices). Sixteen patients (84%) improved markedly and were rehabilitated to New York Heart Association functional class I-II. Three patients are still on support. Significant improvements in hemodynamic function (based on analysis of the percent change from pre-LVAD condition to pretransplantation) were observed: cardiac index rose from 1.6 +/- 0.2 to 3.2 +/- 0.9 L/min per m2 (P = .0002), left atrial pressure fell from 22.9 +/- 9.5 to 8.0 +/- 5.5 mm Hg (P = .003), RV ejection fraction increased from 19.8 +/- 11.3% to 40.8 +/- 8.9% (P = .0004), pulmonary vascular resistance decreased from 5.2 +/- 2.6 to 2.0 +/- 0.8 Wood units (P = .004). Thirteen patients had successful transplants after a mean duration of 66 days on the LVAD (range, 22 to 101 days). There were no thromboembolic events while the patients were on the LVAD. Only aspirin with dipyridamole was given for anticoagulation during a total of > 1100 patient days of support. CONCLUSIONS: Bridge to transplant implantable LVAD experience indicates that hemodynamic improvement should be significant after insertion of the devices and that the risk of thromboembolic events with the HeartMate LVAD should be extremely low. Rehabilitation and quality of life should be markedly improved. Limitations of extrapolating this clinical experience to the permanent implantable LVAD include that these patients were hospitalized (permanent implants will be outpatients); the "vented-electric" HeartMate LVAD was not tested (it is a portable, battery-powered device), and true "chronic" LVAD support (> 1 year) was not tested, so questions regarding long-term device reliability and the chronic risk of infection are unknown.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed1993

Surgical alternatives for patients with heart failure.

Chronic heart failure is a progressive syndrome characterized by diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) or left ventricular failure not amenable to acute interventions of myocardial revascularization. A spectrum of treatment options is available to such patients. Medical therapies consist largely of pharmacologic alternatives and are used in the early stages of heart failure to slow the processes of ventricular remodeling. Surgical interventions are used as adjunctive therapies in the later stages of heart failure. These procedures include coronary endarterectomy, high-risk surgical revascularization, automatic internal cardioverter-defibrillator insertion (Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Conjunction with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Trial), cardiac transplantation, and dynamic cardiomyoplasty. This article provides an overview of each of these surgical therapies. Indications for each procedure and patient selection criteria are outlined. A description of each surgical procedure is included. Guidelines for postoperative nursing care are provided, and postoperative complications are discussed.

Cardiac Output, Low↗
PubMed1991

Single-lung transplantation with atrial septal defect repair for Eisenmenger's syndrome.

Heart-lung transplantation has been used successfully for patients with pulmonary vascular disease but its application has been very limited due to the scarcity of donors. We report a patient with Eisenmenger's syndrome who underwent right single-lung transplantation with closure of atrial septal defect; postoperative convalescence was uneventful. Serial magnetic resonance imaging examinations demonstrate improved right heart function.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Anatomic fitting studies of a total artificial heart in heart transplant recipients. Critical dimensions and prediction of fit.

Anatomic fitting studies of the Cleveland Clinic-Nimbus total artificial heart were performed in 33 patients undergoing heart transplantation. The pump fit in the pericardial space in 20 men (80%) and 4 women (50%). There was no significant difference between the Fit and Non-Fit groups in external chest dimensions. Among 42 intrathoracic dimensions, the distance from the center of the mitral valve to the diaphragm (Fit: 5.6 +/- 2.2 cm, Non-Fit: 3.6 +/- 0.4 cm, p < 0.00001) and the distance from the caudal end of the pulmonary valve to the diaphragm (Fit: 9.4 +/- 1.6 cm, Non-Fit: 6.3 +/- 0.8 cm, p < 0.0001) were the most critical. To predict anatomic fit, an index (A x B x C) was obtained from chest X-ray measurements (A, the craniocaudal distance from the dorsal region of the 8th left rib to the left diaphragm; B, the maximum left chest width; and C, the maximum anteroposterior sternum-vertebrae dimension). The pump fit in 88.5% of the patients with an index above 1200 cm3, whereas it fit in only 14.3% of the patients with an index below 1200 cm3 (p < 0.001). This index was an easily obtainable, good predictor of anatomic fit.

Diaphragm↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Lung and heart-lung transplantation: the state of the art.

Lung and heart-lung transplantation is one of the most rapidly evolving transplantation fields. Survival has been improving with better patient selection, better graft preservation, and better immunosuppression. This paper outlines criteria for patient selection, reviews the surgical options involving lung transplantation, and discusses factors influencing morbidity and survival in these patients. The Cleveland Clinic Foundation experience with these procedures is presented. Lung and heart-lung transplantation has emerged from the experimental realm to the therapeutic, and can now be offered as an effective treatment option to many patients with previously fatal heart and lung disorders.

Contraindications↗