PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R W Frelick

Publications and source records attributed to R W Frelick.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Is better access to medical care needed in Delaware?

Improved access will require more primary care providers, a reduction in administrative red tape, and a clientele with healthy lifestyles who know how to use the system appropriately. Prevention is a necessary component of access even though it often takes years to produce results and is usually not dramatic or glamorous (the heart attack which does not occur is hard to measure). Over time, the health of Delawareans should show improvement through appropriate access to medical care, which should not only be cost effective but add to the quality of life.

Delaware↗
PubMed1979

Combination chemotherapy for soft-tissue sarcomas: a phase III study.

A total of 144 patients with advanced sarcomas were entered into a randomized prospective protocol with four treatment arms utilizing different combinations of chemotherapeutic agents. Of these, 120 patients (83%) were judged acceptable. Treatment 1: actinomycin-D (Act-D), 0.01 mg/kg IV, days 1--5; phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM), 4 mg PO, days 1--10 every six weeks. Treatment 2: Act-D, 0.01 mg/kg IV, days 1--5; L-PAM, 4 mg PO, days 1--10; vincristine, 1 mg IV, days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, repeat every six weeks. Treatment 3: Act-D, 0.01 mg/kg IV, days 1--5; L-PAM, 4 mg PO, DAYS 1--10; NSC-1026, 200 mg/kg IV, days 1--6. Treatment 4: Adriamycin, 0.4 mg/kg IV, days 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, 10, then 2XWK starting day 15 (max. 1,200 mg). There was a provision that upon progression of the disease in the first three treatment regimens, patients would be crossed over to Treatment 4. Responses were as follows: 1 - Partial Response (PR) 1/25; No Change (NC) 9/25 (36%). gF2 - NC 17/26 (65%). 3 - NC 13/25 (52%). 4 - Complete Response (CR) 1/41; PR 6/41; (15%); NC 27/41 (66%). Clearly Treatment 4 was the best arm, with a 17% response rate and an initial progression rate of 17%. The only other response was a partial in 1. The difference is statistically significant (H = 17.247, P = 0.0006). If the responders to Adriamycin were analyzed without crossovers, the response rate would be 22% (6/27). (H = 14.079, P = 0.003). Median times to progression were 12.5, 8.7 weeks for 1 and 2, and 5 weeks for 3 and 4. There was no significant difference in the median survival times among the four treatment arms. It appears that Adriamycin as a single drug is superior to the drug combinations and would probably be even more effective used in combination with known active agents.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1978

Adjuvant chemotherapy in large-bowel cancer: demonstration of effectiveness of single agent chemotherapy in a prospectively controlled,, randomized trial.

In a prospectively randomized study, the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU on survival and recurrence rates was analyzed in 299 evaluable patients with colorectal carcinoma who either underwent a curative or a palliative resection. In the treatment group, chemotherapy consisted of the intravenous administration of 12 mg/kg daily of 5-FU for 4 consecutive days, then 6 mg/kg on alternate days, to the point of toxicity, or to a maximum of five doses, followed by 12mg/kg weekly for 1 year. Some degree of drug toxicity was seen in the majority of patients, was rarely severe, and there have been no drug-related deaths. Analysis of the survival curves and disease-free interval curves reveal definite evidence of drug benefit in two unfavorable subgroups, namely patients with Dukes C tumors and in patients whose tumor was located in the rectum. In the chemotherapy groups, patients who were treated to toxicity (WBC less than 4000 mm3), the disease-free interval was significantly longer than the nonleukopenic patients. We conclude that the addition of 5-FU to the surgical treatment of colorectal carcinoma provides a small, but significant benefit in patients with colorectal cancer in certain unfavorable subgroups, namely patients with Dukes C lesions and patients with rectal carcinoma.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1977

Adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil after surgical resection of colorectal carcinoma (COG protocol 7041). A preliminary report.

In a prospectively randomized study the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU on survival and recurrence was analyzed in 274 evaluable patients with colorectal carcinoma who either underwent a curative or a palliative resection. In the treatment group, chemotherapy consisted of the intravenous administration of 5-FU 12 mg/kg daily for four consecutive days, then 6 mg/kg/per day on alternate days to the point of toxicity or to a maximum of 5 doses, followed by 12 mg/kg/week for one year. Drug toxicity was rarely severe and consisted of nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, stomatitis, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia in slightly more than half of all patients. There have been no drug-related deaths. Analysis of the survival curves and disease-free interval curves reveal some evidence of drug benefit in both the curative group of resections and the palliative group of resections. However, this benefit is not significant except in those treated to toxicity. The disease-free interval after curative resection is significantly longer in patients treated with 5-FU to the point of toxicity with a white blood count less than 4,000 cells/mm3. We conclude that a preliminary analysis of the Central Oncology Group data in this trial does not make a convincing case for the use of 5-FU as an adjuvant to the surgical treatment of colorectal carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1975

A phase III study in lung carcinoma comparing hexamethyl-melamine (NSC 13875) to dibromodulcitol (NSC 104800) 1,2.

A phase III study was designed comparing the effectiveness of Hexamethyl-melamine (NSC 13875) to Dibromodulcitol (NSC 104800) in lung carcinoma. 250 of the 316 patients entered on the study were stratified into groups according to stage of disease and cell type. The results showsed Hexamethylmelamine to be more effective in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and slightly superior to Dibromodulcitol in patients with anaplastic/undifferentiated cell carcinoma, whereas Dibromodulcitol proved to be more effective in patients with adenocarcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗