PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R W Penn

Publications and source records attributed to R W Penn.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

The effect of surface preparation on metal/bone cement interfacial strength.

This study is concerned with finding practical ways for strengthening metal/bone cement (M/BC) interfaces via surface alterations and identifying fundamental mechanisms underlying M/BC adherence. Shear strengths have been inferred from torsion tests using shear-lag analysis. The variables examined with regard to their effects on interfacial strength are substrate material, surface roughness, interface porosity, passivation and sterilization, surface cleaning procedures, and use of bone cement precoated metals. M/BC interfaces can be substantially strengthened by applying the bone cement to the metal with high pressure. This would be a practical way to strengthen interfaces for precoated implants. The acrylic polymerized in vivo would employ the usual low pressure method. Otherwise, the main method for improving M/BC interfaces is through changing surface topography. Cleaning or chemical treatments have relatively minor effects. Roughened surfaces, as expected, produce stronger interfaces. Dramatic strength improvements occurred with a porous arc plasma sprayed layer on the substrate. Surprisingly, highly polished surfaces also improve interface strength (compared to less polished surfaces). The hypothesis is advanced that M/BC adherence depends upon superposition of mechanical interlocking and atomic interaction effects, with the latter predominating for finer finishes and vice versa. Differences exist between materials which are independent of roughness.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗

Time-dependent failure of a polyolefin rubber candidate material for blood pump applications.

Failure behavior of a polyolefin elastomer which is a candidate material for blood pump applications has been studied under uniaxial and equibiaxial test conditions. Both static and dynamic (fatigue) testing were performed to study four aspects of material failure behavior as suggested by a cumulative damage failure model. Results from testing a standard formulation butyl rubber are presented for comparison. Our results show that the uniaxial failure behavior under static loads for the butyl rubber is superior to that of the polyolefin rubber at high loads but that the polyolefin is superior at low loads. Under fatigue loading conditions, the failure times for both rubbers decrease with increasing test frequency. The observed frequency dependence lies between that predicted by the cumulative damage model and that predicted by a cycle dependent fatigue model. The distribution of failure times for the polyolefin rubber is broader than that for the butyl rubber. For both uniaxial and equibiaxial testing, the distribution of failure times changes in going from the static testing to dynamic testing. This is true for both rubbers.

Assisted Circulation↗