PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R Willemsen

Publications and source records attributed to R Willemsen.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Elevated Fmr1 mRNA levels and reduced protein expression in a mouse model with an unmethylated Fragile X full mutation.

The human FMR1 gene contains a CGG repeat in its 5' untranslated region. The repeat length in the normal population is polymorphic (5-55 CGG repeats). Lengths beyond 200 CGGs (full mutation) result in the absence of the FMR1 gene product, FMRP, through abnormal methylation and gene silencing. This causes Fragile X syndrome, the most common inherited form of mental retardation. Elderly carriers of the premutation, defined as a repeat length between 55 and 200 CGGs, can develop a progressive neurodegenerative syndrome: Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). In FXTAS, FMR1 mRNA levels are elevated and it has been hypothesised that FXTAS is caused by a pathogenic RNA gain-of-function mechanism. We have developed a knock in mouse model carrying an expanded CGG repeat (98 repeats), which shows repeat instability and displays biochemical, phenotypic and neuropathological characteristics of FXTAS. Here, we report further repeat instability, up to 230 CGGs. An expansion bias was observed, with the largest expansion being 43 CGG units and the largest contraction 80 CGG repeats. In humans, this length would be considered a full mutation and would be expected to result in gene silencing. Mice carrying long repeats ( approximately 230 CGGs) display elevated mRNA levels and decreased FMRP levels, but absence of abnormal methylation, suggesting that modelling the Fragile X full mutation in mice requires additional repeats or other genetic manipulation.

Alleles↗

The generation of a conditional Fmr1 knock out mouse model to study Fmrp function in vivo.

The FMR1 gene, mutated in Fragile X syndrome patients, has been modeled in mice with a neomycin cassette inserted in exon 5 of the mouse Fmr1 gene creating an Fmr1 knockout (Fmr1 KO) allele. This results in animals lacking Fmr1 protein (Fmrp) expression in all tissues. We have created a new, more versatile Fmr1 in vivo KO model (Fmr1 KO2) and generated conditional Fmr1 KO (CKO) mice by flanking the promoter and first exon of Fmr1 with lox P sites. This enables us to create a null allele in specific cell types and at specific time points by crossing Fmr1 CKO mice with tissue specific or inducible cre-recombinase expressing mice. The new Fmr1 KO2 line does not express any Fmrp and also lacks detectable Fmr1 transcripts. Crossing the Fmr1 CKO line with a Purkinje cell-specific cre-recombinase expresser produces mice that are null for Fmr1 in Purkinje neurons but wild type in all other cell types.

Animals↗

Deletion of FMR1 in Purkinje cells enhances parallel fiber LTD, enlarges spines, and attenuates cerebellar eyelid conditioning in Fragile X syndrome.

Absence of functional FMRP causes Fragile X syndrome. Abnormalities in synaptic processes in the cerebral cortex and hippocampus contribute to cognitive deficits in Fragile X patients. So far, the potential roles of cerebellar deficits have not been investigated. Here, we demonstrate that both global and Purkinje cell-specific knockouts of Fmr1 show deficits in classical delay eye-blink conditioning in that the percentage of conditioned responses as well as their peak amplitude and peak velocity are reduced. Purkinje cells of these mice show elongated spines and enhanced LTD induction at the parallel fiber synapses that innervate these spines. Moreover, Fragile X patients display the same cerebellar deficits in eye-blink conditioning as the mutant mice. These data indicate that a lack of FMRP leads to cerebellar deficits at both the cellular and behavioral levels and raise the possibility that cerebellar dysfunctions can contribute to motor learning deficits in Fragile X patients.

Animals↗

Hereditary Pick's disease with the G272V tau mutation shows predominant three-repeat tau pathology.

Frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 have been associated with mutations in the microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT or tau) gene. This disorder is characterized by a large spectrum of neuronal and glial tau lesions in different brain regions. Pick bodies were found in a family with hereditary Pick's disease with the G272V mutation and in several families with other tau mutations in exons 9 and 11-13. The biochemical composition of Pick bodies varies between these mutations. Until recently, no detailed biochemical characterization of G272V brain material was done owing to unavailability of fresh frozen brain material. We now report a detailed study using the immunohistochemistry, western blots and electron microscopy of two brains with the G272V mutation that recently became available. Both brains showed severe neuronal loss in the temporal cortex, whereas in the frontal cortex the loss was less; and abundant Pick bodies in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, and caudate nucleus. The Pick bodies consisted exclusively of three-repeat (3R) isoforms, as was demonstrated by isoform-specific antibodies and supported by western blot analysis of sarkosyl-insoluble tau. These observations confirm that this family diagnosed with hereditary Pick disease meets all the criteria for this condition, including the presence of Pick bodies that are unphosphorylated at Ser262 and contain twisted filaments with long periodicity consisting only of 3R tau.

Blotting, Western↗

Redirecting human CD4+ T lymphocytes to the MHC class I-restricted melanoma antigen MAGE-A1 by TCR alphabeta gene transfer requires CD8alpha.

Adoptive immunotherapy involving the transfer of autologous tumor or virus-reactive T lymphocytes has demonstrated its effectiveness in the eradication of cancer and virally infected cells. Clinical trails and in vitro studies have focused on CD8+ cytotoxic T-cell receptor (TCR) alphabeta lymphocytes since these cells directly kill virally infected- and tumor cells after antigen-specific recognition via their TCR alphabeta. However, increasing evidence suggests that induction of sustained immunity against cancer and viral infections depends on the presence of tumor- or virus-specific CD4+ T lymphocytes, which are restricted by MHC class II. Here, we show that these MHC class II-restricted CD4+ T lymphocytes can efficiently be redirected to MHC class I-restricted tumor cells by retroviral introduction of an HLA-A1/MAGE-A1-specific chimeric two-chain TCR ValphaCalphazeta/VbetaCbetazeta (tcTCR/zeta). However, TCR-transduced CD4+ T lymphocytes were only able to specifically bind to HLA-A1/MAGE-A1 complexes and respond to HLA-A1+/MAGE-A1+ melanoma cells when the CD8alpha gene was cointroduced. These CD4+/CD8alpha+/TCR(POS) T lymphocytes produce IFN-gamma, TNFalpha and IL-2 when specifically stimulated via the introduced TCR with immobilized HLA-A1/MAGE-A1 complexes or HLA-A1+/MAGE-A1+ melanoma cells. Furthermore, introduction of the CD8alpha gene into TCR(POS) T lymphocytes rendered these T lymphocytes cytotoxic for HLA-A1+/MAGE-A1+ melanoma cells. These results demonstrate that human CD4+ T lymphocytes when genetically grafted with an HLA-A1/MAGE-A1-specific TCR and CD8alpha are induced to kill and produce cytokines upon specific interaction with the relevant melanoma cells. Hence, CD4+ T lymphocytes, in addition to CD8+ T lymphocytes, may be critical effector cells for adoptive immuno-gene therapy to generate a sustained tumor-specific immune response in cancer patients.

Antigens, Neoplasm↗

Immunohistochemical FMRP studies in a full mutated female fetus.

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common form of inherited mental retardation. Clinical manifestations are due to the absence of the FMRP protein. Affected patients have widely variable phenotypes which are more variable in females than males, presumable due to X inactivation. We report the expression pattern of FMRP in cerebral cortex and ovary in a control and a full-mutated female fetus. FMRP was expressed in mutated and control fetal tissues, although at different levels and patterns. Control fetal cerebral cortex showed FMRP expression in almost all cells, whereas the full mutation carrier showed FMRP positivity in roughly 50% of cortical cells without any specific pattern. In the ovary samples, FMRP expression was seen in all germ cells surrounded by FMRP-negative paragranulosa and interstitial cells. The Müllerian epithelium of the fetal Fallopian tube was continuously positive in the control case, whereas the full mutation carrier showed a discontinuous patchy pattern. Expression of homologue proteins FXR1P and FXR2P showed no differences between control and full mutation fetuses. The pattern of FMRP expression in full mutation carrier females is in agreement with a random X-inactivation in maturing fetal tissues. Immunohistochemical results on cerebral tissues provide a clue for the variation of mental affection among female carriers, depending not only on the number of cells devoid of FMRP, but also on the ultimate destination of those cells in sensitive or more silent location for a proper cerebral development.

Blotting, Southern↗

The X chromosome and fragile X mental retardation.

Fragile X syndrome represents the most common inherited cause of mental retardation. It is caused by a stretch of CGG repeats within the fragile X gene, which increases in length as it is transmitted from generation to generation. Once the repeat exceeds a threshold length, no protein is produced, resulting in the fragile X phenotype. Both X chromosome inactivation and inactivation of the FMR1 gene are the result of methylation. X inactivation occurs earlier than inactivation of the FMR1 gene. The instability to a full mutation is dependent on the sex of the transmitting parent and occurs only from mother to child. For most X-chromosomal diseases, female carriers do not express the phenotype. A clear exception is fragile X syndrome. It is clear that more than 50% of the neurons have to express the protein to ensure a normal phenotype in females. This means that a normal phenotype in female carriers of a full mutation is accompanied by a distortion of the normal distribution of X inactivation.

Chromosomes, Human, X↗

Mammalian Golgi-associated Bicaudal-D2 functions in the dynein-dynactin pathway by interacting with these complexes.

Genetic analysis in Drosophila suggests that Bicaudal-D functions in an essential microtubule-based transport pathway, together with cytoplasmic dynein and dynactin. However, the molecular mechanism underlying interactions of these proteins has remained elusive. We show here that a mammalian homologue of Bicaudal-D, BICD2, binds to the dynamitin subunit of dynactin. This interaction is confirmed by mass spectrometry, immunoprecipitation studies and in vitro binding assays. In interphase cells, BICD2 mainly localizes to the Golgi complex and has properties of a peripheral coat protein, yet it also co-localizes with dynactin at microtubule plus ends. Overexpression studies using green fluorescent protein-tagged forms of BICD2 verify its intracellular distribution and co-localization with dynactin, and indicate that the C-terminus of BICD2 is responsible for Golgi targeting. Overexpression of the N-terminal domain of BICD2 disrupts minus-end-directed organelle distribution and this portion of BICD2 co-precipitates with cytoplasmic dynein. Nocodazole treatment of cells results in an extensive BICD2-dynactin-dynein co-localization. Taken together, these data suggest that mammalian BICD2 plays a role in the dynein- dynactin interaction on the surface of membranous organelles, by associating with these complexes.

Animals↗

Familial frontotemporal dementia with ubiquitin-positive inclusions is linked to chromosome 17q21-22.

Hereditary frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disorder that is associated with mutations in the tau gene and with the pathological accumulation of hyperphosphorylated tau protein in affected brain cells in about a quarter of cases. However, most FTD families have no demonstrable tau mutations. Here we describe the clinical and neuropathological features of a large family with hereditary FTD. Genetic analysis showed strong evidence for linkage to chromosome 17q21-22 (maximum lod score 3.46, theta = 0 for marker D17S950), but mutations in the tau gene were not found. Clinical symptoms, neuropsychological deficits and neuroimaging findings of affected family members were similar to sporadic and tau-related FTD. The mean age at onset was 61.2 years, with loss of initiative and decreased spontaneous speech as the most prominent presenting symptoms. Pathological examination of the brains of two affected family members showed non-specific neuronal degeneration with dense cytoplasmic ubiquitin-positive inclusions in neurones of the second layer of the frontotemporal cortex and dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. In a number of neurones these inclusions appeared to be located inside the nucleus, although due to the small number of these inclusions this localization could not be confirmed by electron microscopy. The inclusions were not stained by tau, alpha-synuclein or polyglutamine antibodies. Biochemical analysis of soluble tau did not reveal abnormalities in tau isoform distribution and analysis of mRNA showed the presence of both three- and four-repeat transcripts. This is the first report of ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions in an FTD family with significant linkage to chromosome 17q21-22. Further characterization of the ubiquitin-positive inclusions may clarify the neurodegenerative pathways involved in this subtype of FTD.

Aged↗

Diagnostic tests for fragile X syndrome.

Fragile X syndrome is a common X-linked hereditary disease, characterized by mental retardation, macroorchidism and mild facial abnormalities and is almost always caused by the absence or deficit of the FMR1 protein. In the majority of cases, the disease is associated with an expansion of a CGG repeat, located in the 5' UTR of the FMR1 gene. Diagnostic methods include PCR amplification and Southern blotting, which are performed on DNA isolated from peripheral leukocytes. Recently, varying immunocytochemical tests have been described to identify fragile X patients, based on the detection of FMR1 protein in cells by a monoclonal antibody. This review provides an update on the different DNA methods and gives specific attention to both the newly developed PCR method and antibody methods for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome.

Blotting, Southern↗

Restoring the phenotype of fragile X syndrome: insight from the mouse model.

A mouse model for the fragile X syndrome, the most common form of inherited mental retardation, was generated a number of years ago. It shows characteristics compatible with the clinical symptoms of human patients. These include pathological changes such as macroorchidism, behavioral problems, and diminished visuo-spatial abilities. To investigate whether the fragile X syndrome is a potentially correctable disorder, several groups attempted to 'rescue' the knockout mutation by introduction of an intact copy of the FMR1 gene in the knockout mouse. Two different types of rescue mice have been created by injection of constructs based on FMR1 cDNA or on FMR1 genomic DNA. Several pathological, behavioral and cognitive function tests were performed on these two different rescue mouse lines to compare their characteristics with those of the knockout and control littermates. Each rescue line resembled the control in some aspects though neither of the 2 lines was a full 'rescue', e.g. resemble the control in all aspects investigated. Thus, rescue of some aspects of the phenotype has been achieved by introduction of FMR1 constructs in the fragile X knockout mice. The results implicate that, even if FMR1 production is cell type specific, the quantity of the FMRP expression is highly critical as overproduction may have a harmful effect.

Animals↗

Mutation-dependent aggregation of tau protein and its selective depletion from the soluble fraction in brain of P301L FTDP-17 patients.

Mutations in the gene for the microtubule-associated protein tau are associated with frontotemporal dementia and parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17). In this study we compared the presence of the P301L mutated tau protein from brain material of patients with that of the normal 4-repeat, using polyclonal antibodies specific for the P301L point mutation and its normal counterpart. We determined the relative ratio of mutated versus normal tau protein in the sarkosyl-soluble and -insoluble protein fractions from several brain regions. Although mutated and normal tau proteins are both present in the sarkosyl-insoluble deposits, quantitative analysis showed that the mutated protein is the major component. In the sarkosyl-soluble fraction of frontal and temporal cortex the overall ratio of 3-repeat versus 4-repeat tau isoforms is unchanged but there is a dramatic depletion of mutant tau protein. Furthermore, we observed an increase in tau-immunoreactive cleavage products with the P301L antibody, suggesting that the mutant protein is partly resistant to degradation and this is confirmed by pulse-chase experiments. This is the first direct evidence using patient material that shows a selective aggregation of mutant tau protein resulting in sarkosyl-insoluble deposits and the specific depletion of mutated tau protein in the soluble fraction.

Aged↗

Screening for the fragile X syndrome among mentally retarded males by hair root analysis.

A noninvasive antibody test was used to identify male fragile X patients in special education schools, on the basis of the lack of FMRP in hair roots. We studied 300 males with mental retardation of unknown cause attending special schools. Patients were divided into two groups, based on the scores according to a fragile X check list (Group 1 </= 9 points and Group 2 >/= 10 points). Group 2 consists of 51 males and only 5 males in this group showed no FMRP expression in hair roots within the abnormal range (91%). Fragile X diagnosis in these cases was confirmed by DNA analysis. None of the males scoring more than 10 on the check list was diagnosed positive for the fragile X syndrome using DNA analysis. With our antibody test on hair roots we did not detect a fragile X patient in Group 1. The FMRP antibody test on hair roots is suitable in a screening program for the fragile X syndrome among mentally retarded males attending special education schools.

Adolescent↗

Immunocytochemical and biochemical characterization of FMRP, FXR1P, and FXR2P in the mouse.

Fragile X syndrome is caused by the absence of expression of the FMR1 gene. Both FXR1 and FXR2 are autosomal gene homologues of FMR1. The products of the three genes are belonging to a family of RNA-binding proteins, called FMRP, FXR1P, and FXR2P, respectively, and are associated with polyribosomes as cytoplasmic mRNP particles. The aim of the present study is to obtain more knowledge about the cellular function of the three proteins (Fxr proteins) and their interrelationships in vivo. We have utilized monospecific antibodies raised against each of these proteins and performed Western blotting and immunolabeling at the light-microscopic level on tissues of wild-type and Fmr1 knockout adult mice. In addition, we have performed immunoelectron microscopy on hippocampal neurons of wild-type mice to study the subcellular distribution of the Fxr proteins. A high expression was found in brain and gonads for all three proteins. Skeletal muscle tissue showed only a high expression for Fxr1p. In the brain the three proteins were colocalized in the cytoplasm of the neurons; however, in specific neurons Fxr1p was also found in the nucleolus. Immunoelectronmicrsocopy on hippocampal neurons demonstrated the majority of the three proteins in association with ribosomes and a minority in the nucleus. The colocalization of the Fxr proteins in neurons is consistent with similar cellular functions in those specific cells. The presence of the three proteins in the nucleus of hippocampal neurons suggests a nucleocytoplasmic shuttling for the Fxr proteins. In maturing and adult testis a differential expression was observed for the three proteins in the spermatogenic cells. The similarities and differences between the distribution of the Fxr proteins have implications with respect to their normal function and the pathogenesis of the fragile X syndrome.

Animals↗

FMRP detection assay for the diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome.

Fragile X syndrome is almost always caused by the absence or deficit of the FMR1 protein (FMRP). Diagnostic methods include polymerase chain reaction and Southern blotting, which are performed on DNA isolated from peripheral leukocytes. Recently, different immunocytochemical tests have been described to identify patients with fragile X syndrome, based on the detection of FMRP in cells by a monoclonal antibody. This review aims to provide an update on the different antibody methods for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of the fragile X syndrome.

Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1↗