PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

R del Campo

Publications and source records attributed to R del Campo.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Genetic and phenotypic differences among Enterococcus faecalis clones from intestinal colonisation and invasive disease.

This study investigated the differences among Enterococcus faecalis isolates from the intestinal compartment of healthy volunteers (n = 36), intensive care unit (ICU) patients (n = 29) and blood isolates (n = 31) from the same institution, in comparison with seven epidemic clones from other institutions. In general, isolates from colonised ICU patients and from bacteraemic patients showed higher rates of antimicrobial resistance than isolates from colonised healthy volunteers, particularly for erythromycin and aminoglycosides. The proportion of isolates/clone was 1.05 in the community, 2.63 in the ICU, and 1.47 among bacteraemic cases, suggesting low clonal variation in ICUs. Two clones, RENC1 and RENC2, were frequently found as intestinal colonisers of ICU patients, and RENC1 was also found to colonise healthy volunteers. These two clones were a cause of bacteraemia in the institution studied, and RENC2 was also detected in various other Spanish hospitals. Both RENC1 and RENC2 were esp+, bacteriocin producers, and were resistant to all antibiotics tested except vancomycin and ampicillin. RENC1 produced haemolysin whereas RENC2 produced protease. The ace, agg, cylA, esp and gelE genes were more common among colonising strains from ICU patients than among isolates from individuals in the community. In both colonised groups (ICUs and the community), 40-50% of isolates harbouring the gelE and cylA genes did not express the corresponding phenotypes. Thus, the study indicated that particular E. faecalis clones might be well-adapted to hospital environments, and that surveillance should be directed specifically towards rapid detection of these disseminating clones in order to prevent infections and clonal spread.

Antigens, Bacterial↗

Antimicrobial resistance in recent fecal enterococci from healthy volunteers and food handlers in Spain: genes and phenotypes.

Susceptibility patterns to 15 different antibiotics and the presence of resistance genes were evaluated in recent fecal Enterococcus isolates recovered from 42 healthy volunteers (HV) and 43 food-handlers (FH). A total of 142 Enterococcus faecalis, 74 Enterococcus faecium, and 23 Enterococcus spp. with different antibiotic susceptibility patterns were studied. A higher percentage of resistance for moxifloxacin, erythromycin, glycopeptides and high-level resistance (HLR) to gentamicin were observed in the FH group. Ampicillin- or linezolid-resistant isolates were not recovered in any of the groups. The tet(M) gene was found in 96% and in 85% of tetracycline-resistant isolates from HV and FH, respectively. HLR-kanamycin was mediated by aph(3')-IIIa, or aac(6')-aph(2"), or both genes in all isolates from HV group and in 86% from FH group. The aac(6')-aph(2") gene was found in all HLR-gentamicin isolates. Ninety-one percent of HV and 71% of FH erythromycin-resistant isolates harbored the erm(B) gene (erythromycin MIC range of 8-128 microg/ml), whereas erm(A), erm(C), or mef(A) genes were not detected. Coexistence of erm(B), aph(3')-IIIa, and tet(M) genes was observed in 17% of the isolates of both groups. The HLR-gentamicin isolates presented unrelated PFGE patterns while 2 out of 3 vanA E. faecium isolates showed an indistinguishable SmaI-pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) pattern. This study shows that despite 4 years of official banning of antibiotic growth promoters in animals, enterococci isolated from FH are more resistant than those from HV. This suggests the permanence of resistant clones or transferable resistance elements in farms and a possible exchange between food products and humans, or eventually the long-term permanence of certain clones in the FH intestinal tract.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Comparative in vitro bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity of trovafloxacin, levofloxacin and moxifloxacin against clinical and environmental isolates of Legionella spp.

The susceptibility of 140 Legionella spp isolates (106 clinical and 34 environmental isolates) to trovafloxacin (TRFX), levofloxacin (LEVX), moxifloxacin (MOFX), ciprofloxacin (CIPX), ofloxacin (OFLX), erythromycin (ERY), azithromycin (AZI) and rifampicin (RIF) was studied using a standard microdilution method and buffered yeast extract broth (BYE) supplemented with 0.1% alpha-ketoglutarate. The post-antibiotic effects (PAEs) of the study drugs against 10 clinical isolates of Legionella pneumophila sg.1 were compared. The MIC inhibiting 90% of strains tested on BYEalpha broth were 0.008, 0.016, 0.016, 0.06, 0.125, 0.5, 0.5, and 0.004 mg/l for TRFX, LEVX, MOXX, CIP, OFLX, ERY, AZI, and RIF, respectively. The MBC/MIC ratios ranged from one to eight depending on the antibiotic tested: TRFX [1x-2 x MIC], LEVX, MOFX, CIPX and OFLX [1x-4 x MIC], RIF [2x-4 x MIC], ERY and AZI [2x-8 x MIC]. TRFX, RIF, LEVX, MOFX, CIPX, OFLX, ERY and AZI showed similar activity against Legionella species other than L. pneumophila. One-hour exposures to the study antimicrobial agents at a concentration of 4 x MIC resulted in PAEs as follows (average in hours): TRFX: 2.68 h; RIF: 2.63 h; CIPX: 2.62 h; MOFX: 2.56 h; LEVX: 2.41 h; OFLX: 2.25 h; AZI: 1.65 h; and ERY: 1.54 h. In conclusion, our in vitro data confirm that trovafloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin and rifampicin have excellent bacteriostatic and bactericidal activity against Legionella spp and show significant post-antibiotic effect.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Bacteriocin production in vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-susceptible Enterococcus isolates of different origins.

Bacteriocin production was determined for 218 Enterococcus isolates (Enterococcus faecalis [93] and E. faecium [125]) obtained from different origins (human clinical samples [87], human fecal samples [78], sewage [28], and chicken samples [25]) and showing different vancomycin susceptibility patterns (vancomycin resistant, all of them vanA positive [56], and vancomycin susceptible [162]). All enterococcal isolates were randomly selected except for the vancomycin-resistant ones. A total of 33 isolates of eight different bacterial genera were used as indicators for bacteriocin production. Forty-seven percent of the analyzed enterococcal isolates were bacteriocin producers (80.6% of E. faecalis and 21.6% of E. faecium isolates). The percentage of bacteriocin producers was higher among human clinical isolates (63.2%, 81.8% of vancomycin-resistant isolates and 60.5% of vancomycin-susceptible ones) than among isolates from the other origins (28 to 39.3%). Only one out of the 15 vancomycin-resistant isolates from human fecal samples was a bacteriocin producer, while 44.4% of fecal vancomycin-susceptible isolates were. The bacteriocin produced by the vanA-containing E. faecium strain RC714, named bacteriocin RC714, was further characterized. This bacteriocin activity was cotransferred together with the vanA genetic determinant to E. faecalis strain JH2-2. Bacteriocin RC714 was purified to homogeneity and its primary structure was determined by amino acid sequencing, showing an identity of 88% and a similarity of 92% with the previously described bacteriocin 31 from E. faecalis YI717. The presence of five different amino acids in bacteriocin RC714 suggest that this could be a new bacteriocin. The results obtained suggest that the epidemiology of vancomycin resistance may be influenced by different factors, including bacteriocin production.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes in high-level streptomycin and gentamicin resistant Enterococcus spp. in Spain.

Aminoglycoside resistance was evaluated in 690 enterococcus strains isolated from different clinical sources originating from patients at the University Clinic Hospital of Zaragoza (Spain). The enterococci obtained from clinically significant samples (blood, urine, or exudates) showed more high-level resistance to gentamicin and streptomycin (65 and 42%, respectively) than those isolated from faecal samples (49 and 23%, respectively). Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AME) from 119 of these high-level gentamicin and streptomycin resistant enterococcus strains were studied. The most frequent AMEs found were APH(3') and AAC(6')-APH(2"). More than one enzyme was detected in 71% of the strains (four different enzymes in 5% of the strains). Three Enterococcus faecalis strains had ANT(4')(4") enzymatic activity. Different enzymatic expressions of the bifunctional enzyme AAC(6')-APH(2") were demonstrated in strains in which the complete aac(6')-aph(2") gene was detected by PCR and hybridization: (i) AAC(6') + APH(2") activity; (ii) AAC(6') only; (iii) APH(2") only; and (iv) no activity of AAC(6') or APH(2").

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗