PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

RJH Payne

Publications and source records attributed to RJH Payne.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model.

I present a 'cumulative assessment model', which describes dyadic antagonistic encounters in which a contestant's decision whether to persist or to flee is based upon a cumulative sum of its adversary's actions. It is particularly relevant to ritualized fights in which only a certain total of direct physical damage can be tolerated, but it can also be applied to displays without physical contact provided they are subject to external time costs (such as from predation risk). The cumulative assessment model provides an alternative to the sequential assessment model or the war of attrition as a description of temporally extended displays. I describe how the three may be distinguishable in real situations by consideration of escalatory properties and of characteristic intrapopulation variation. The model predicts that, under some circumstances, losers may start the encounter at a lower level of intensity but increase that level more rapidly than winners. Such behaviour has been observed in the cyprinodont fish Aphyosemion striatum. Copyright 1998 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour.

Journal Article

Why do animals repeat displays?

Both agonistic and sexual animal displays often involve more than one performance of some specific display action. Since repetition is energetically costly there must be good reasons why a signaller should carry out such repetitive actions, rather than simply displaying once. We briefly review three different 'reasons' which arise from three different receiver assessment rules: when assessment is based on the average magnitude of all display actions so far, the reason for the repetition is to improve the accuracy of the estimate (model A); when the assessment is based solely on the action of greatest magnitude so far, the repetition is to replace the signal with one of greater magnitude (model B); when the assessment is based on the cumulative sum of all display actions so far, the repetition is to augment that sum (model C). We discuss how to characterize each case from an understanding of its expected optimal behaviour as predicted by formal models. For model A the mean magnitude of display actions should stay constant and the contest duration should depend on relative qualities. In models B and C the encounter duration depends only on the weaker participant. In model B each display action is greater than the previous, but only a small number of steps are expected. In model C the magnitude of display actions can either escalate, stay constant, or even decrease. The displays of cichlid fish, the roaring contests of red deer, Cervus elaphusthe calling of Blanchard's cricket frogs, Acris crepitans blanchardiand the pheromonal exchanges of yeast gametes are used as illustrative examples.

Journal Article