Biomedical subjects

Rachel Ward

Publications and source records attributed to Rachel Ward.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Subfunctionalization: How often does it occur? How long does it take?

The mechanisms responsible for the preservation of duplicate genes have been debated for more than 70 years. Recently, Lynch and Force have proposed a new explanation: subfunctionalization--after duplication the two gene copies specialize to perform complementary functions. We investigate the probability that subfunctionalization occurs, the amount of time after duplication that it takes for the outcome to be resolved, and the relationship of these quantities to the population size and mutation rates.

Gene Duplication↗

PubMed2004

Ovalbumin-induced airway inflammation and fibrosis in mice also exposed to ozone.

A murine model of allergen-induced airway inflammation was used to examine the effects of exposure to ozone on airway inflammation and remodeling. Sensitized BALB/c mice were exposed to ovalbumin aerosol for 4 wk before and after 2 wk of exposure to either 0.2 ppm or 0.5 ppm ozone. Other groups of mice were exposed to ovalbumin aerosol for 6 wk with continuous concurrent exposure to ozone during wk 1-6, or during intermittent concurrent exposure to ozone. Lung inflammation was measured by quantitative differential evaluation of lung lavage cells and by histological evaluation of stained lung sections. Alterations in lung structure (airway fibrosis) were evaluated by quantitative biochemical analysis of microdissected airways. The same total number of cells was observed in lavage fluid from animals exposed for 4 wk to ovalbumin alone or to ovalbumin for 4 wk immediately before or after exposure to 2 wk of 0.2 or 0.5 ppm ozone. Mice exposed to ovalbumin for 6 wk with concurrent exposure to either 0.2 ppm or 0.5 ppm ozone during wk 3-6 had a significant decrease in the total number of cells recovered by lavage. Values as low as 7% of the cell number found in mice exposed to ovalbumin aerosol alone were observed in the mice exposed to ovalbumin plus 0.2 ppm ozone during wk 3-6. There were significant differences in the cell differential counts in the lavage fluid from mice exposed to ovalbumin alone as compared with values from mice exposed to ovalbumin and ozone under all of the protocols studied. When ozone was given for 2 wk prior to ovalbumin exposure (Experiment 1), there were a high percentage of macrophages and low percentages of lymphocytes and eosinophils in the lung lavage. When ozone was given for 2 wk after ovalbumin exposure (Experiment 2), there were a moderate percentage of macrophages, a low percentage of eosinophils, and a high percentage of lymphocytes in the lung lavage. When ozone and ovalbumin were given simultaneously (Experiments 3 and 4), there were a high percentage of macrophages in the lavage with 0.2 ppm ozone and a high percentage of eosinophils. Ozone appears to antagonize the specific inflammatory effects of ovalbumin exposure, especially when given before or during exposure to ovalbumin. Airway remodeling was examined by two different quantitative methods. None of the groups exposed concurrently to ovalbumin and ozone had a significant increase in airway collagen content as compared to the matched groups of mice exposed to ovalbumin alone. The findings were consistent with an additive response of mice to simultaneous exposure to ovalbumin and ozone. Ozone exposure alone for 6 wk did not affect the number of goblet cells in the airways, while mice exposed to ovalbumin aerosol alone for 6 wk had about 25% goblet cells in their conducting airways. Concurrent exposure to ovalbumin and 0.2 ppm ozone caused significant increases in goblet cells (to 43% of total cells) in the conducting airways of the exposed mice. We conclude that when mice with allergen-induced airway inflammation induced by ovalbumin are also exposed to ozone, the lung inflammatory response may be modified, but that this altered response is dependent on the sequence of exposure and the concentration of ozone to which they are exposed. At the concentrations of ozone tested, we did not see changes in airway fibrosis. However, goblet-cell hyperplasia appeared to be increased in mice exposed concurrently to ovalbumin and 0.2 ppm ozone.

Aerosols↗

PubMed2004

Ovalbumin-induced airway inflammation and fibrosis in mice also exposed to ultrafine particles.

A murine model of allergen-induced airway inflammation was used to examine the effects of exposure to ultrafine particles (PM(2.5)) on airway inflammation and remodeling. Lung inflammation was measured by quantitative differential evaluation of lung lavage cells. Alterations in lung structure (airway remodeling and fibrosis) were evaluated by quantitative biochemical analysis of microdissected airways and by histological evaluation of stained lung sections. The same total number of cells was observed in lavage fluid from animals exposed for 4 wk to ovalbumin alone or to ovalbumin for 4 wk immediately before or after 6 exposures over a period of 2 wk to 235 ug/m(3) of PM(2.5). Mice exposed to ovalbumin for 6 wk with concurrent exposure to PM(2.5) during wk 5-6 had a significant decrease in the total number of cells recovered by lavage as compared with the group exposed to ovalbumin alone. There were no significant differences in the cell differential counts in the lavage fluid from mice exposed to ovalbumin alone as compared with values from mice exposed to ovalbumin and PM(2.5) under the protocols studied. Airway structural changes (remodeling) were examined by three different quantitative methods. None of the groups exposed to ovalbumin and PM had a significant increase in airway collagen content evaluated biochemically (i.e., total airway collagen) as compared to the matched groups of mice exposed to ovalbumin alone. Airway collagen content evaluated histologically by sirius red staining showed significant increases in all of the animals exposed to ovalbumin, with or without PM, and no apparent difference between the ovalbumin group and mice exposed to PM with ovalbumin. The findings were consistent with an additive, or less than additive, response of mice to exposure to PM and ovalbumin. Air or PM exposure alone for 2 wk did not result in observable goblet cells in the airways, while mice exposed to ovalbumin aerosol alone for 4 wk had about 20-25% goblet cells in their conducting airways. Sequential exposure to ovalbumin and PM (or vice versa) caused significant increases in goblet cells (to about 35% of total cells) in the conducting airways of the exposed mice. We conclude that when mice with allergen-induced airway inflammation induced by ovalbumin are also exposed to PM(2.5), the lung inflammatory response and airway remodeling may be modified, but that this altered response is dependent upon the sequence of exposure and the duration of exposure to ovalbumin aerosol. At the concentrations of PM tested, we did not see changes in airway fibrosis or airway reactivity for animals exposed to ovalbumin and PM(2.5) as compared with animals exposed only to ovalbumin aerosol. However, goblet-cell hyperplasia was significantly increased in mice exposed concurrently to ovalbumin and PM(2.5) as compared with mice exposed to ovalbumin alone.

Air Pollutants↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluating a respiratory intermediate care team.

This article examines the work of a respiratory intermediate care team. Findings from an audit and a patient satisfaction postal questionnaire are presented to assess the effectiveness of the team's work and evaluate the effect of specialist nursing teams on hospital bed days and patient preference. From the evaluation it is apparent that the respiratory intermediate care team is an effective means of saving hospital bed days through prevention of admission and early discharge in patients with chronic respiratory disease. The results of the patient satisfaction postal questionnaire show that the majority of patients find hospital-at-home style care favourable because they feel well-supported at home to self-manage their condition. This outcome is important because it indicates that specialist nursing teams in primary care are valuable to patients and save the NHS money.

Acute Disease↗