Biomedical subjects

Radhouane Dallel

Publications and source records attributed to Radhouane Dallel.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The orofacial formalin test in the mouse: a behavioral model for studying physiology and modulation of trigeminal nociception.

UNLABELLED: The aim of the current study was to adapt the orofacial formalin pain model previously developed in rats for use in mice and to characterize as fully as possible the behavioral changes in this species. The effects of subcutaneous injection of different formalin concentrations (.5%, 1%, 2%, 4%, and 8%) were examined on the face-rubbing response. In mice, formalin injection into the upper lip induced sustained face-rubbing episodes with vigorous face-wash strokes directed to the perinasal area. A positive linear relationship between formalin concentration and amplitude of the rubbing activity was observed during the first and second phase of the test with concentration up to 4%. With the highest concentration used (8%), the amplitude of both phases had plateaued. Systemic administration of morphine and paracetamol induced a dose-dependent inhibition of the rubbing behavior during the second phase. Although both paracetamol and morphine inhibited the first phase, a dose-dependent inhibition was found only for morphine. The ED50 value (95% confidence interval) for suppressing the rubbing response during the first phase was 2.45 mg/kg (1.90-3.08 mg/kg) for morphine. The ED50 values for suppressing the rubbing response during the second phase were 3.52 mg/kg (2.85-4.63 mg/kg) for morphine and 100.66 mg/kg (77.98-139.05 mg/kg) for paracetamol. Heterosegmental nociceptive stimulation evoked by subcutaneous injection of capsaicin into the back of the animal 10 min before the formalin test produced a dose-dependent inhibition of the second phase of the rubbing response. The ED50 values for suppressing the rubbing response during the first and second phases were 9.04 microg (1.36-65.13 microg) and 0.92 microg (0.28-2.99 microg), respectively. In conclusion, the mouse orofacial formalin test appears to be a reliable model for studying the behavioral encoding of the intensity of nociceptive orofacial stimulation and the counter-irritation phenomenon and for testing analgesic drugs. PERSPECTIVE: To further exploit the new opportunities of investigating nociceptive processing at the molecular level with the transgenic "knockout" approach, we require suitable behavioral models in mice. The presented mouse orofacial formalin test appears to be a reliable model for studying the behavioral encoding of the intensity of nociceptive stimulation and the counter-irritation phenomenon and for testing analgesic drugs.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed2005

Both oral and caudal parts of the spinal trigeminal nucleus project to the somatosensory thalamus in the rat.

Recent evidence has been accumulated that not only spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (Sp5C) neurons but also spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis (Sp5O) neurons respond to noxious stimuli. It is unknown, however, whether Sp5O neurons project to supratrigeminal structures implicated in the sensory processing of orofacial nociceptive information. This study used retrograde tracing with Fluorogold in rats to investigate and compare the projections from the Sp5O and Sp5C to two major thalamic nuclei that relay ascending somatosensory information to the primary somatic sensory cortex: the ventroposteromedial thalamic nucleus (VPM) and the posterior thalamic nuclear group (Po). Results not only confirmed the existence of contralateral projections from the Sp5C to the VPM and Po, with retrogradely labelled neurons displaying a specific distribution in laminae I, III and V, they also showed consistent and similar numbers of retrogradely labelled cell bodies in the contralateral Sp5O. In addition, a topographic distribution of VPM projections from Sp5C and Sp5O was found: neurons in the dorsomedial parts of Sp5O and Sp5C projected to the medial VPM, neurons in the ventrolateral Sp5O and Sp5C projected to the lateral VPM, and neurons in intermediate parts of Sp5O and Sp5C projected to the intermediate VPM. All together, these data suggest that not only the Sp5C, but also the Sp5O relay somatosensory orofacial information from the brainstem to the thalamus. Furthermore, trigemino-VPM pathways conserve the somatotopic distribution of primary afferents found in each subnucleus. These results thus improve our understanding of trigeminal somatosensory processing and help to direct future electrophysiological investigations.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Organization of parabrachial projections from the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis: an anterograde tracing study in the rat.

In recent years, we have accumulated data showing that the spinal trigeminal nucleus oralis (Sp5O) contributes to the processing of somatosensory inputs from the orofacial region. Although the parabrachial area (PB) represents the main brainstem relay for autonomic, nociceptive, and gustatory afferents, few data are available regarding the topographical distribution of the efferent projections from the Sp5O to the PB. We have addressed this question with the rat, by using the anterograde tracer Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin. A dense trigeminoparabrachial pathway from the Sp5O toward, predominantly, the ipsilateral PB was revealed. Projections come mainly from the dorsal part of the Sp5O that was found to innervate densely the medial, external medial, and ventral lateral subnuclei. In contrast, the ventral part of the Sp5O projected almost exclusively to an as yet not formally described region, located dorsally and laterally to the lateral tip of the brachium conjunctivum, close to the Kölliker-Fuse nucleus. These results suggest that distinct regions within the Sp5O may be involved in the processing of gustatory and nociceptive information.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitor prevents implantation of eutopic endometrium to ectopic sites in rats.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Cox-2 inhibition on surgically induced endometriosis in rats. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study SETTING: Academic facility. ANIMAL(S): Seventy adult female Sprague-Dawley rats. INTERVENTION(S): Uterine fragments were implanted into abdominal peritoneum with suture (site A), and/or into the pelvic cavity without suture (site B). Oral gavage of Cox-2 inhibitor (5 mg/kg/day, twice/day) was started 4 weeks postimplantation (protocol-1), after implantation (protocol-2), or beforehand (protocol-3). Controls received vehicle. Immunohistochemistry evaluated Cox-2 expression after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT(S): Presence and size of ectopic implants after treatment. RESULT(S): Protocol-1: After 4 weeks' treatment, size of ectopic implants (site A) was significantly reduced compared with pretreatment size. After 8 weeks' treatment, no ectopic implants were detected in 2 (40%, site A) and 3 (60%, site B) rats. Protocol-2: After 2 weeks' treatment, no ectopic implants were detected in 3 (50%, site A) and 2 (33%, site B) rats. After 4 weeks' treatment, no ectopic implants were detected in 3 (50%, site A) and 3 (50%, site B) rats. Protocol-3: After 2 or 4 weeks' vehicle-only treatment, ectopic implants were in all rats (site B). CONCLUSION(S): Cox-2 selective inhibition was effective in a rat model of endometriosis, particularly in prevention of ectopic implants.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

The orofacial formalin test.

The subcutaneous injection of formalin into the rat upper lip generates behavioral responses that last several minutes. The time course of the response is similar to what is observed following formalin injection into the paw, i.e. biphasic, with an early and short-lasting first phase followed, after a quiescent period by a second, prolonged (tonic) phase. The applied chemical stimulus (formalin) can be qualified as noxious since it produces tissue injury, activates Adelta and C nociceptors as well as trigeminal and spinal nociceptive neurons and is felt as painful in man. In addition, increasing the concentration of formalin causes a parallel aggravation of histological signs of tissue inflammation and injury. The measured behavioral response (face rubbing) is a relevant end-point: prolonged face rubbing is evoked by formalin but not saline injection and a positive relationship between the amplitude of the response and the formalin concentration is observed, at least up to 2.5%. At higher formalin concentrations, the use of other or additional end-points should be considered. Finally, the behavioral response in the orofacial formalin test is sensitive to various opioid and non-opioid analgesics. The orofacial formalin test can then be considered as a reliable way of producing and quantifying nociception in the trigeminal region of the rat.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Synergistic antinociceptive effect of amitriptyline and morphine in the rat orofacial formalin test.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy is often used to increase the clinical utility of analgesic agents. The coadministration of two compounds may achieve analgesia at doses lower than those required for either compound alone, leading to enhanced pain relief and reduction of adverse effects. Herein, the authors describe the effect of coadministration of morphine and amitriptyline on cutaneous orofacial inflammatory pain in rats. METHODS: Amitriptyline, morphine, or the combination of amitriptyline and morphine was administered systemically to rats, and antinociceptive effects were determined by means of the rat orofacial formalin test. Isobolographic analysis was used to define the nature of the interactions between morphine and amitriptyline. RESULTS: Amitriptyline as well as morphine produced a dose-related inhibition in the first phase and the second phase of rubbing activity. ED50 values against rubbing behavior were 14.6 mg/kg (95% confidence interval, 10.2-33.5 mg/kg) and 1.3 mg/kg (95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.7 mg/kg) for amitriptyline and morphine, respectively. Combinations of increasing fractional increments of amitriptyline and morphine ED50 doses produced a synergistic effect against rubbing behavior, as revealed by isobolographic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The current study suggests that systemic amitriptyline and morphine synergistically inhibit cutaneous orofacial inflammatory pain in rats.

Amitriptyline↗

PubMed2003

Contribution of neurokinin 1 receptors in the cutaneous orofacial inflammatory pain.

This study investigated the role of neurokinin 1 receptors (NK1R) in inflammatory cutaneous orofacial pain. The effects of subcutaneous and intracisternal administration of the NK1R antagonist SR140333 on the face rubbing response provoked by injection of 50 micro l of 1.5% formalin into the vibrissa pad were examined. Subcutaneous administration of SR140333 (5, 15, 30 mg/kg) induced a dose-related depressant effect on both the first and second phases of the formalin test. In contrast, intracisternal administration of SR140333 (10, 30, 60, 90 microg) produced a decrease only on the second phase with an apparent ceiling effect at approximately 50%. These data suggest that persistent nociceptive effects associated with orofacial cutaneous inflammation depend at least in part on the activation of NK1R.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

[Neurobiology of trigeminal pain].

The brainstem trigeminal complex integrates somatosensory inputs from orofacial areas and meninges. Recent studies have shown the existence of a double representation of pain within the brainstem, at the level of both caudalis and oralis subnuclei. Noxious messages are mainly conveyed by C-fibers that activate the subnucleus caudalis neurons. These neurons in turn activate the subnucleus oralis whose neurons share similar features with the deep spinal dorsal horn neurons. In contrast with the nearness of the laminar organization of the dorsal horn, the vertical organization of the trigeminal complex offers an easier access for the study of segmental mechanisms of nociceptive processing. This model allowed us to show the existence of subtle NMDA-related mechanisms of segmental nocious processing. The trigeminal complex conveys nociceptive messages to several brainstem and thalamic relays that activate a number of cortical areas responsible for pain sensations and reactions. Cortical processing is sustained by reciprocal interactions with thalamic areas and also by a direct modulation of their pre-thalamic relays. The dysfunction of these multiple modulatory mechanisms probably plays a key role in the pathophysiology of chronic trigeminal pain.

Afferent Pathways↗

PubMed2002

The orofacial capsaicin test in rats: effects of different capsaicin concentrations and morphine.

The aim of this study was to develop a rat model of capsaicin-induced pain in the orofacial region. We examined the effects of subcutaneous injection of different doses of capsaicin (0.25, 0.4, 0.8, 1.5, 2.5, 25, 50, 100, 500 microg) on the face-grooming response. Injection of capsaicin into the vibrissa pad produced an immediate grooming of the injected area with ipsilateral fore- or hindpaw. A positive relationship between the amplitude of the grooming response and the capsaicin dose was observed until 1.5 microg, but with the highest concentrations (ranging from 25 to 500 microg) the amplitude of the response decreased. Morphine administered either systemically (in the neck, 0.5-4.0 mg/kg) or locally (0.25-1.0 mg/kg) reduced in a dose-dependent fashion the face grooming provoked by subcutaneous capsaicin (1.5 microg). The systemic and local morphine effects could be reversed by systemic (0.1 mg/kg) and local (0.05 mg/kg) administration of naloxone, respectively. The local administration of morphine (ED(50): 0.65 mg/kg) was more potent than systemic injection (ED50: 2.54 mg/kg) in reducing the grooming behavior. In conclusion, the orofacial capsaicin test appears to be a valid and reliable method for studying trigeminal pain mechanisms and testing analgesic drugs. The results of the present study also support the clinical use of peripheral opioid administration for the treatment of orofacial painful conditions.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed1995

Evidence for a peripheral origin of the tonic nociceptive response to subcutaneous formalin.

The orofacial formalin test in the rat is a valid and reliable model of nociception and is sensitive to various classes of analgesic drugs. The noxious stimulus consists in an injection of diluted formalin (2.5% in saline) into the upper lip. The behavioural nociceptive response is measured in terms of the amount of time the animal spends rubbing the injected area. Two distinct periods of intense rubbing activity can be identified, a first phase occurring in the first 3 min and a second phase lasting from 12 to 39 min after formalin injection. The present study verified the peripheral origin of the first phase of the formalin response and examined whether the second phase is produced by peripheral activation of afferent fibres and/or by a phenomenon of central facilitation induced by the neural activity that occurs during the first phase. This was determined by assessing the effect of a local anaesthetic agent (lidocaine) administered into the formalin injection site, before or after the first phase of the formalin response. Local injection of 50 microliters of lidocaine prior to formalin completely abolished the first phase of the formalin response but this blockade did not significantly influence the appearance and development of the second phase. Thus, the primary afferent activity that normally occurs during the first phase of the formalin response is not a prerequisite for the expression of the second phase. A higher dose of lidocaine (150 microliters) induced, in addition, inhibition of the first part of the second phase.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Afferent Pathways↗

PubMed1995

The orofacial formalin test in rats: effects of different formalin concentrations.

In this study of the orofacial formalin test in rats, the effects of different formalin concentrations (0.2%, 0.5%, 1.5%, 2.5%, 5% and 10%) on the behavioural nociceptive response (face rubbing) was investigated. The histological responses of the skin were also evaluated. Increasing the concentration of formalin caused a parallel aggravation of histological signs of tissue inflammation and injury. All concentrations provoked an early phase of nociceptive response, but its intensity was not concentration-dependent. The 2nd phase of response to formalin only occurred for concentrations of 1.5% and higher. A positive relationship between the formalin concentration and the amplitude of the rubbing activity measured between 12 and 45 min after injection could be observed until 2.5% but with the highest concentrations (5 and 10%), the amplitude of the response decreased. Our findings indicate that the orofacial formalin test should be carried out using concentration between 0.5 and 2.5%. This is essential to assess increase as well as decrease in pain intensity. Moreover, this will have the effect of minimizing the suffering of the experimental animal.

Animals↗