PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Raelene E Maser

Publications and source records attributed to Raelene E Maser.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Preserved autonomic function in amenorrheic athletes.

Reproductive hormones such as estradiol and progesterone are known to influence autonomic cardiovascular regulation. The purpose of this study was to determine whether amenorrheic athletes (AA) have impaired autonomic cardiovascular regulation compared with eumenorrheic athletes (EA). Thirty-five athletes were tested: 13 AA (19 +/- 1 yr), 13 EA (21 +/- 1 yr), and 9 EA (23 +/- 1 yr) on oral contraceptives (EA-OC). Multiple indexes of autonomic cardiovascular regulation were assessed: respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) via phase IV and phase II of the Valsalva maneuver, a spontaneous index of BRS, and the heart rate and blood pressure responses to orthostatic stress (20-min 60 degrees head-up tilt). RSA was not different among the groups. There were no group differences in the spontaneous index of BRS (AA = 30 +/- 6, EA = 24 +/- 3, EA-OC = 29 +/- 5 ms/mmHg) or in phase II (AA = 8 +/- 2, EA = 7 +/- 1, EA-OC = 8 +/- 1 ms/mmHg) of the Valsalva. There was a difference in BRS during phase IV (AA = 21 +/- 3, EA = 15 +/- 1, EA-OC = 26 +/- 6 ms/mmHg; ANOVA P = 0.04). Tukey's post hoc test indicated that BRS was greater in the EA-OC group compared with the EA group (P = 0.04). There were no differences in cardiovascular responses to orthostatic stress among the groups. In conclusion, AA do not display signs of impaired autonomic function and orthostatic responses compared with EA or EA-OC during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle.

Adult↗

Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy due to diabetes mellitus: clinical manifestations, consequences, and treatment.

CONTEXT: The aim of this article was to review the importance of the clinical identification of persons with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and discuss potential treatment interventions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A MEDLINE search was conducted for articles published during the last 20 yr. In addition, subsequent references of retrieved articles were reviewed. Search strategies included using key terms such as CAN, heart rate variability, orthostatic hypotension, and diabetes mellitus. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: CAN is a common form of diabetic autonomic neuropathy and causes abnormalities in heart rate control as well as central and peripheral vascular dynamics. The clinical manifestations of CAN include exercise intolerance, intraoperative cardiovascular lability, orthostatic hypotension, painless myocardial ischemia, and increased risk of mortality. CAN contributes to morbidity, mortality, and reduced quality of life for persons with diabetes. The American Diabetes Association has recently published a statement that provides guidelines for prevention, detection, and management of neuropathy, including CAN, for healthcare providers who care for patients with diabetes. Algorithms for the evaluation and treatment of the patient with CAN, even if the patient is asymptomatic, are provided in this review. CONCLUSIONS: Once CAN is identified in a patient with diabetes, healthcare providers may consider altering the prescribed exercise regimen, increasing surveillance for cardiac ischemia, carefully reexamining the list of prescribed medications, and aggressively treating cardiovascular risk factors (e.g. hypertension) that may be associated with the development of CAN.

Autonomic Nervous System Diseases↗

Diabetic autonomic neuropathy.

Diabetic autonomic neuropathy (DAN) is a serious and common complication of diabetes. Despite its relationship to an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality and its association with multiple symptoms and impairments, the significance of DAN has not been fully appreciated. The reported prevalence of DAN varies widely depending on the cohort studied and the methods of assessment. In randomly selected cohorts of asymptomatic individuals with diabetes, approximately 20% had abnormal cardiovascular autonomic function. DAN frequently coexists with other peripheral neuropathies and other diabetic complications, but DAN may be isolated, frequently preceding the detection of other complications. Major clinical manifestations of DAN include resting tachycardia, exercise intolerance, orthostatic hypotension, constipation, gastroparesis, erectile dysfunction, sudomotor dysfunction, impaired neurovascular function, "brittle diabetes," and hypoglycemic autonomic failure. DAN may affect many organ systems throughout the body (e.g., gastrointestinal [GI], genitourinary, and cardiovascular). GI disturbances (e.g., esophageal enteropathy, gastroparesis, constipation, diarrhea, and fecal incontinence) are common, and any section of the GI tract may be affected. Gastroparesis should be suspected in individuals with erratic glucose control. Upper-GI symptoms should lead to consideration of all possible causes, including autonomic dysfunction. Whereas a radiographic gastric emptying study can definitively establish the diagnosis of gastroparesis, a reasonable approach is to exclude autonomic dysfunction and other known causes of these upper-GI symptoms. Constipation is the most common lower-GI symptom but can alternate with episodes of diarrhea. Diagnostic approaches should rule out autonomic dysfunction and the well-known causes such as neoplasia. Occasionally, anorectal manometry and other specialized tests typically performed by the gastroenterologist may be helpful. DAN is also associated with genitourinary tract disturbances including bladder and/or sexual dysfunction. Evaluation of bladder dysfunction should be performed for individuals with diabetes who have recurrent urinary tract infections, pyelonephritis, incontinence, or a palpable bladder. Specialized assessment of bladder dysfunction will typically be performed by a urologist. In men, DAN may cause loss of penile erection and/or retrograde ejaculation. A complete workup for erectile dysfunction in men should include history (medical and sexual); psychological evaluation; hormone levels; measurement of nocturnal penile tumescence; tests to assess penile, pelvic, and spinal nerve function; cardiovascular autonomic function tests; and measurement of penile and brachial blood pressure. Neurovascular dysfunction resulting from DAN contributes to a wide spectrum of clinical disorders including erectile dysfunction, loss of skin integrity, and abnormal vascular reflexes. Disruption of microvascular skin blood flow and sudomotor function may be among the earliest manifestations of DAN and lead to dry skin, loss of sweating, and the development of fissures and cracks that allow microorganisms to enter. These changes ultimately contribute to the development of ulcers, gangrene, and limb loss. Various aspects of neurovascular function can be evaluated with specialized tests, but generally these have not been well standardized and have limited clinical utility. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is the most studied and clinically important form of DAN. Meta-analyses of published data demonstrate that reduced cardiovascular autonomic function as measured by heart rate variability (HRV) is strongly (i.e., relative risk is doubled) associated with an increased risk of silent myocardial ischemia and mortality. The determination of the presence of CAN is usually based on a battery of autonomic function tests rather than just on one test. Proceedings from a consensus conference in 1992 recommended that three tests (R-R variation, Valsalva maneuver, and postural blood pressure testing)or longitudinal testing of the cardiovascular autonomic system. Other forms of autonomic neuropathy can be evaluated with specialized tests, but these are less standardized and less available than commonly used tests of cardiovascular autonomic function, which quantify loss of HRV. Interpretability of serial HRV testing requires accurate, precise, and reproducible procedures that use established physiological maneuvers. The battery of three recommended tests for assessing CAN is readily performed in the average clinic, hospital, or diagnostic center with the use of available technology. Measurement of HRV at the time of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and within 5 years after diagnosis of type 1 diabetes (unless an individual has symptoms suggestive of autonomic dysfunction earlier) serves to establish a baseline, with which 1-year interval tests can be compared. Regular HRV testing provides early detection and thereby promotes timely diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. HRV testing may also facilitate differential diagnosis and the attribution of symptoms (e.g., erectile dysfunction, dyspepsia, and dizziness) to autonomic dysfunction. Finally, knowledge of early autonomic dysfunction can encourage patient and physician to improve metabolic control and to use therapies such as ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers, proven to be effective for patients with CAN.

Autonomic Nervous System Diseases↗

Sharing the pain.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Diabetes Mellitus↗

The association between cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy and mortality in individuals with diabetes: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To examine by meta-analysis the relationship between cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and risk of mortality in individuals with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched Medline for English-language articles published from 1966 to 2001. Fifteen studies having a baseline assessment of cardiovascular autonomic function and mortality follow-up were identified. The analyses were stratified according to whether a single abnormality or two or more measures of cardiovascular autonomic function were used to define CAN. A global measure of association (i.e., relative risk) was generated for each group by pooling estimates across the studies using the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. RESULTS: CAN was significantly associated with subsequent mortality in both groups, although the magnitude of the association was stronger for those studies for which two or more measures were used to define CAN. The pooled relative risk for studies that defined CAN with the presence of two or more abnormalities was 3.45 (95% CI 2.66-4.47; P < 0.001) compared with 1.20 (1.02-1.41; P = 0.03) for studies that used one measure. CONCLUSIONS: These results support an association between CAN and increased risk of mortality. The stronger association observed in studies defining CAN by the presence of two or more abnormalities may be due to more severe autonomic dysfunction in these subjects or a higher frequency of other comorbid complications that contributed to their higher mortality risk. Future studies should evaluate whether early identification of subjects with CAN can lead to a reduction in mortality.

Autonomic Nervous System Diseases↗

Effect of treatment with losartan on cardiovascular autonomic and large sensory nerve fiber function in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a 1-year randomized, controlled trial.

This study evaluated the effect of losartan, an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, on cardiovascular autonomic function and large sensory nerve fiber function in individuals with diabetes mellitus. In a double-blind placebo-controlled trial, individuals were randomly assigned to treatment with a daily oral dose of 50-mg losartan (n=24) or placebo (n=20) for 12 months. Tests of cardiovascular autonomic function (i.e., RR-variation during deep breathing and the Valsalva maneuver) and of large sensory nerve fiber function (i.e., vibratory thresholds) were measured at baseline and at 12 months. No significant difference at baseline was found for duration of diabetes, glycemic control, blood pressure, or body mass index (BMI) between the two groups. After 12 months, the decline in RR-variation that occurs over time appeared to be less for those taking losartan. There was, however, no statistically significant change in the results for any of the tests of cardiovascular autonomic function or vibratory thresholds between the groups. Multivariate analyses in the losartan study group revealed an independent association of duration of diabetes, change in (reduced) systolic blood pressure (SBP), and improved vibratory thresholds. This association was particularly noted for women. Pharmacologic agents may affect cardiovascular autonomic function by favorable or detrimental changes in the electrophysiology of the heart. The results of this study indicate that, although losartan may have slowed the normal decline in RR-variation, it did not result in any significant improvement in cardiovascular autonomic nerve fiber function. An association of vibratory thresholds and SBP was observed.

Adult↗

Detection of subsequent episodes of gestational diabetes mellitus: a need for specific guidelines.

Guidelines for detection of individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) indicate that glucose testing for women with a history of GDM should occur as soon as feasible with retesting of an initially negative screen to occur between the 24th and 28th week of gestation. The aim of this study was to evaluate medical records for individuals enrolled in a GDM management program that presented with two subsequent pregnancies with GDM and to determine if more specific guidelines for detection are needed. Records (n=60) from both pregnancies were reviewed for gestational age at enrollment, delivery, and when insulin was started, infant birth weights and complications (e.g., hypoglycemia), and maternal complications (e.g., emergency cesarean section). Over half [33/60 (55%)] of the women required insulin during both pregnancies, while 16.7% (10/60) required insulin during the second enrollment for GDM but not the first. For those requiring insulin during both pregnancies, 88% (29/33) required it earlier during the subsequent pregnancy (31.5+/-2.7 vs. 21.6+/-8.4 weeks of gestation, P<.001). During the subsequent pregnancy, approximately 1/2 of the women requiring insulin needed it before the 24th week of gestation while 1/3 required it by the 15th week. Also during the subsequent pregnancy, neonate birth weights declined (3494+/-521 vs. 3356+/-515 g, P<.05) and there were fewer complications. Given that approximately 70% of the women required insulin therapy during a subsequent GDM pregnancy and that this therapy was on average necessary by the 22nd week of gestation, we recommend that specific guidelines be established with a definitive time frame determined for the detection of repeat episodes of GDM.

Diabetes, Gestational↗