PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rafe Connors

Publications and source records attributed to Rafe Connors.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PDGF(BB) increases myocardial production of VEGF: shift in VEGF mRNA splice variants after direct injection of bFGF, PDGF(BB), and PDGF(AB).

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) plays an important role in angiogenesis. We hypothesized that a combination of recombinant angiogenic proteins might induce myocardial VEGF production and cause a shift in the mRNA signal produced. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The left ventricles of New Zealand white rabbits were injected with 500 microL of saline, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF(AB)), platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF(BB)), bFGF + PDGF(AB), or bFGF + PDGF(BB). Myocardial VEGF production was analyzed by ELISA while mRNA splice variants were analyzed by RT-PCR 3 and 7 days after injection. RESULTS: PDGF(BB) alone caused the most pronounced induction of VEGF. Three days after injection the induction of VEGF by PDGF(BB) was significant compared to all treatment groups, except the bFGF + PDGF(BB) group. Induction of VEGF by PDGF(BB) was associated with a decrease in mRNA production of VEGF(121) within the myocardium. CONCLUSIONS: Injection of PDGF(BB) induces significant production of VEGF within the myocardium. This induction of VEGF production is associated with a shift toward other, less soluble forms of VEGF. These findings may allow more precise regulation of the myocardial response to therapeutic angiogenesis.

Animals↗

Accuracy and reproducibility of biometry using partial coherence interferometry.

PURPOSE: To determine whether partial coherence interferometry is comparable to standard contact ultrasonic biometry in accuracy, reproducibility, and ease of use. SETTING: Academic university practice. METHODS: In this prospective study, simultaneous biometry was performed in 91 consecutive patients (111 eyes) using partial coherence interferometry (IOLMaster, Zeiss Humphrey Systems) and ultrasonic biometry (I(3), Innovative Imaging, Inc.). The differences between the predicted spherical equivalent in diopters (D) and the actual results with both techniques were compared. RESULTS: The IOLMaster was significantly better in the mean absolute error (0.533 D +/- 0.589 [SD] versus 0.757 +/- 0.723 D; P = .012) and the percentage of eyes within +/-0.5 D (61.2% versus 42.3%; P = .003) and +/-1.0 D (87.4% versus 77.5%; P =.05) of the predicted refraction. CONCLUSION: The IOLMaster was more accurate and reproducible than the contact ultrasonographic technique.

Biometry↗