Biomedical subjects

Rajendra H Mehta

Publications and source records attributed to Rajendra H Mehta.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Comparison of coronary stenting versus conventional balloon angioplasty on five-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Little is known about the influence of stenting versus balloon angioplasty on long-term outcomes (particularly mortality) after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We evaluated 2,087 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction enrolled in various Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trials in the United States, who underwent primary PCI. The main outcome was all-cause mortality at 5 years, obtained through the National Death Index. Of the 2,087 patients, stenting was performed in 692 (33%). The absolute difference in the hospital (2.2% vs 3.3%), 1-year (3.3% vs 5.2%), and 5-year (10% vs 13%) mortality rates favored patients receiving a stent versus conventional balloon therapy, with the difference increasing with time. A multivariate Cox model identified stent use (vs balloon alone) as an independent correlate of lower 5-year mortality (hazard ratio 0.60, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.85). The absolute reduction in mortality was greatest in the highest risk group. In conclusion, compared with balloon angioplasty, stenting during primary PCI not only resulted in better angiographic and short-term outcomes, but also in a sustained beneficial effect on mortality at 5 years. These data support the routine use of coronary stenting in most patients undergoing primary PCI, when feasible.

Angioplasty, Balloon↗

PubMed2005

Treating patients with acute coronary syndromes with aggressive antiplatelet therapy (from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events).

Few data exist on the use of aggressive combination therapy with thienopyridines and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in higher risk patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The aim of this study was to characterize the combined use of these agents and the associated hospital outcomes in patients with ACS enrolled in the multinational Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Data from 8,081 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina were analyzed. Of these patients, 5,070 (62.7%) received aspirin and a thienopyridine, and the remainder received aspirin, a thienopyridine, and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blocker. The presence of a non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; a history of diabetes or coronary artery bypass surgery; performance of in-hospital catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass grafting; and in-hospital use of heparin were independent predictors of the use of triple antiplatelet therapy with aspirin, thienopyridines, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers. Increased diastolic blood pressure and increased serum creatinine were associated with a failure to prescribe triple therapy. An increased risk of major bleeding during hospitalization was associated with the use of triple antiplatelet therapy (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 2.2). Aggressive antiplatelet therapy was used in approximately 2 of every 5 patients presenting with an ACS. Triple therapy was associated with the performance of catheterization and/or percutaneous coronary intervention, as well as high-risk patient features. Although no differences in hospital death rates were evident in patients receiving triple therapy, this population was at significantly increased risk of major bleeding episodes during hospitalization.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Relation of timing of cardiac catheterization to outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris enrolled in the multinational global registry of acute coronary events.

We assessed whether timing of catheterization is associated with the type of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and/or outcome in patients who were enrolled in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Overall, 8,853 patients who had unstable angina pectoris or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction were categorized according to timing of catheterization: expeditive (<24 hours), early (24 to 48 hours), and delayed (>48 hours). Patients in the delayed group were older, more frequently had previous myocardial infarction or stroke, and had a higher risk score compared with those in the expeditive and early groups (all p < or =0.001). Killip class IV at admission, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and Q waves after the index electrocardiogram were more common in the expeditive group (all p <0.0001). Patients in the expeditive and early groups were treated more aggressively with medications than were those in the delayed group. The in-hospital composite end point (death, stroke, or major bleed) occurred most frequently in the expeditive group (expeditive 6.6%, early 3.9%, delayed 5.1%, p = 0.0005), as did in-hospital death (expeditive 3.5%, early 1.4%, delayed 2.0%, p <0.0001). The highest incidence of death during follow-up occurred in the delayed group (3.8% delayed vs 2.8% expeditive/early, p = 0.0210). Multivariate regression analysis suggested that expeditive catheterization was related to in-hospital death and death from time of catheterization to 6 months. We conclude that expeditive catheterization is associated with unstable presenting features that contribute significantly to the higher risk of death and death or myocardial infarction in hospital compared with patients who undergo later catheterization.

Age Distribution↗

PubMed2005

Association of height with outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving reperfusion therapy.

Data were evaluated for patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (n = 94,182) enrolled in 6 large clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of various reperfusion strategies. It was found that compared with the tallest quartile, incidences of in-hospital reinfarction, stroke, major bleeding, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, and death in the shortest group were 1.4, 1.7, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, and 2.4 times greater, respectively. Although a strong inverse association of height was observed with unadjusted 30-day mortality (p <0.001), it was attenuated after adjustment for confounders, including weight, and appeared to be nonlinear, such that for height </=165 cm, the odds ratio [OR] for a 10-cm increment in height was 1.115 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.014 to 1.223) and for height >165 cm, the OR for a 10-cm increase in height was 0.962 (95% CI 0.896 to 1.033). These data indicate that height-related differences in 30-day mortality are explained in large part by height-related differences in patients' clinical characteristics.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Improved quality of stroke care for hospitalized Medicare beneficiaries in Michigan.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We reported previously that acute ischemic stroke patients encountered delays in obtaining neuroimaging and receiving thrombolysis, and that deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis was used only in a minority of eligible patients. We investigated whether these and other measures improved after a quality improvement initiative. METHODS: Medicare fee-for-service ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack discharges in 136 acute care hospitals in Michigan were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Only patients with stroke symptoms persisting for >1 hour and present on arrival were included in the analysis. Seven quality indicators were abstracted from chart review at baseline (discharges between July 1, 1998, and June 30, 1999) and at remeasurement (discharges between January 1, 2001, and June 30, 2001) after an intensive quality improvement initiative throughout Michigan hospitals. Quality indicators were compared at baseline and remeasurement. RESULTS: Indicators of care were determined in 5146 patients at baseline and 4980 patients on remeasurement. Four quality-of-care indicators showed significant improvement on remeasurement: antithrombotic prescribed at discharge (81.9 baseline versus 83.7% remeasurement; P=0.026), avoidance of sublingual nifedipine in patients with acute ischemic stroke (97.1 versus 99.7%; P<0.0001), documentation of a computed tomography (CT)/MRI during hospitalization (98.0 versus 99.1%; P=0.024), and appropriate deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis (13.8 versus 26.9%; P<0.0001). Time to CT/MRI did not significantly change, but time to thrombolysis improved (113 versus 88.5 minutes; P=0.045). CONCLUSIONS: Improvement occurred in several indicators of quality of care in Michigan Medicare beneficiaries presenting with acute stroke symptoms.

Administration, Sublingual↗

PubMed2005

Relationship of incorrect dosing of fibrinolytic therapy and clinical outcomes.

CONTEXT: Incorrect dosing of alteplase has been associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients. However, patients at high risk of adverse events are more prone to dosing errors, thus confounding this relationship. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the association between incorrect dosing of alteplase and adverse outcomes is related to cause and effect or to confounding. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Observational analysis in May 2004 of a double-blind, double-dummy trial of 16,949 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who were enrolled in the Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic (ASSENT-2) trial and were assigned to either a bolus of tenecteplase (with alteplase placebo bolus plus infusion) or a bolus of alteplase (with tenecteplase placebo plus infusion). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Thirty-day mortality, in-hospital stroke, and major bleeding associated with incorrect dosing of active alteplase compared with placebo alteplase. RESULTS: Incorrect dosing occurred in 4.9% of patients who received active alteplase and in 4.6% of patients who received alteplase placebo. Patients receiving incorrect doses of alteplase or alteplase placebo were more likely to be older, female, black, shorter, have lower body weight and systolic blood pressure, and have a higher Killip class at presentation. Thirty-day mortality was higher in patients who received an overdose (9.8%) or underdose (19.5%) of alteplase compared with those who received a correct dose (5.4%). The same pattern was present in patients who received an alteplase placebo (10.0% for overdose, 23.5% for underdose, and 5.4% for correct dose). Similar patterns were seen for in-hospital intracranial hemorrhage and major bleeding. The higher rates of adverse outcomes with incorrect dosing were largely accounted for by adjusting for baseline characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between incorrect dosing and patient outcome in ASSENT-2 is primarily due to confounding factors rather than incorrect dosing itself. These data highlight the need for caution when ascribing a causal relationship to associations between incorrect dosing and adverse outcomes.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Differences in quality of care among patients hospitalized with atrial fibrillation as primary or secondary cause for admission.

OBJECTIVE: Several factors have been linked to the variation in the quality of care for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Whether hospitalization primarily for AF (primary diagnosis of AF) as opposed to another primary diagnosis but having concomitant AF (secondary diagnosis of AF) impacts quality of care for AF is not known. Accordingly, we sought to evaluate the differences in quality of care of Medicare patients admitted with primary diagnosis versus secondary diagnosis of AF. DESIGN AND SETTING: We studied a random sample of Medicare fee-for-service discharges from Michigan's acute care hospitals over a 1-year period with a primary or secondary diagnosis of AF (ICD-9-CM 427.31). Main outcome measure. Warfarin use at the time of discharge. RESULTS: Of 5993 patients in the study, 772 had a primary diagnosis of AF and 5221 had a secondary diagnosis of AF. Patients with a secondary diagnosis of AF were older, more likely to be male, and less likely to be hypertensive. Patients with a secondary diagnosis of AF 'ideal' for anticoagulation (n = 1648) were less likely to receive warfarin compared with 'ideal' patients with primary diagnosis of AF (n = 363) (52.6% versus. 59.8%, P < 0.001). Adherence to test indicators was lower in patients with secondary diagnosis of AF. CONCLUSION: Secondary diagnosis of AF rather than AF as a primary diagnosis appears to account for most Medicare patients with AF admitted to hospitals. Whereas quality of care is lower in patients with secondary diagnosis of AF, opportunity for quality improvement exists for both groups of patients with AF.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Impact of combined pharmacologic treatment with clopidogrel and a statin on outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: perspectives from a large multinational registry.

AIMS: To evaluate clinical outcomes associated with the combined use of clopidogrel and statins vs. clopidogrel alone on a background of aspirin therapy in patients with the spectrum of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Utilizing data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events, we studied 15 693 patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) or unstable angina, dividing them according to discharge medications: aspirin alone (group I); aspirin + clopidogrel (group II); aspirin + statin (group III); aspirin + clopidogrel + statin (group IV). Among the groups of patients in whom clopidogrel was used (groups II and IV), group II patients were older, more likely to have prior MI, but less likely to have a history of prior revascularization. In-hospital cardiac catheterization and revascularization rates were similar between groups II and IV. Importantly, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 6 month mortality rate was lower in group IV (log-rank test 22.8, P<0.0001). The hazard ratio for the 6 month mortality rate was adjusted using the Cox proportional hazard model for confounding variables and for propensity score, and the 6 month mortality rate for patients in group IV remained lower compared with those in group II [0.59 (0.41-0.86), P<0.0001]. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the combination of clopidogrel with a statin has synergistic effects on the clinical outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Reperfusion strategies for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly: benefits and risks.

The optimal reperfusion strategy in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains a topic of debate. This lack of consensus stems from the exclusion or under-representation of the elderly in clinical trials. This review evaluates the available literature pertaining to reperfusion therapy for the treatment of STEMI in the elderly. We identified all published studies evaluating the effectiveness of thrombolytic therapy, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or adjunctive therapies to reperfusion by conducting an electronic search of MEDLINE through December 2003. Meta-analysis of clinical trials suggests a survival benefit of thrombolytic therapy in the elderly with STEMI, whereas some observational studies have raised concerns about the lack of short-term benefit or possibility of harm with thrombolysis. However, most observational studies demonstrate improved intermediate-term survival with thrombolysis. In contrast, multiple clinical trials and observational studies indicate improved survival and low risk of stroke with primary PCI compared with thrombolysis in elderly patients with STEMI. Information on the efficacy of newer antithrombotic agents as adjunct to thrombolysis or primary PCI is scarce. Available data suggest an increased risk of intracerebral bleeding with the combination of a fibrin-specific agent and a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist in patients >75 years of age. Clearly targeted large-scale clinical trials are needed to evaluate the relative merits of available reperfusion strategies as well as newer antithrombotic adjunctive therapies in the elderly with STEMI.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution.

BACKGROUND: The definition, prevalence, outcomes, and appropriate treatment strategies for acute intramural hematoma (IMH) continue to be debated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 1010 patients with acute aortic syndromes who were enrolled in the International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD) to delineate the prevalence, presentation, management, and outcomes of acute IMH by comparing these patients with those with classic aortic dissection (AD). Fifty-eight (5.7%) patients had IMH, and this cohort tended to be older (68.7 versus 61.7 years; P<0.001) and more likely to have distal aortic involvement (60.3% versus 35.3%; P<0.001) compared with 952 patients with AD. Patients with IMH described more severe initial pain than did those with AD but were less likely to have ischemic leg pain, pulse deficits, or aortic valve insufficiency; moreover, they required a longer time to diagnosis and more diagnostic tests. Overall mortality of IMH was similar to that of classic AD (20.7% versus 23.9%; P=0.57), as was mortality in patients with IMH of the descending aorta (8.3% versus 13.1%; P=0.60) and the ascending aorta (39.1% versus 29.9%; P=0.34) compared with AD. IMH limited to the aortic arch was seen in 7 patients, with no deaths, despite medical therapy in only 6 of the 7 individuals. Among the 51 patients whose initial diagnostic study showed IMH only, 8 (16%) progressed to AD on a serial imaging study. CONCLUSIONS: The IRAD data demonstrate a 5.7% prevalence of IMH in patients with acute aortic syndromes. Like classic AD, IMH is a highly lethal condition when it involves the ascending aorta and surgical therapy should be considered, but this condition is less critical when limited to the arch or descending aorta. Fully 16% of patients have evidence of evolution to dissection on serial imaging.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

Clinical characteristics of hypotension in patients with acute aortic dissection.

To evaluate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of hypotension in unselected patients who had acute aortic dissection (AAD), we studied 1,073 such patients who were enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection between 1996 and 2001. Hypotension was noted in 313 patients (29.2%) who had AAD (46.0% on admission). Multivariate logistic regression identified age >or=70 years (odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4 to 2.9), type A dissection (referent type B AAD; OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.2), neurologic deficit (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.2 to 6.6), syncope (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.8 to 4.7), aortic regurgitation requiring valve surgery (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.3), cardiac tamponade (OR 5.1, 95% CI 3.0 to 8.8), and new Q-wave or ST-segment deviation on an electrocardiogram (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1 to 2.4) as independent associations of hypotension (c statistic 0.78). Hospital complications (neurologic deficits 22.7% vs 12.0%, altered mental status 26.1% vs 4.4%, myocardial ischemia 14.6% vs 6.9%, mesenteric ischemia 6.9% vs 2.6%, or limb ischemia 14.6% vs 6.9%, and death 55.0% vs 10.3%) occurred more frequently in patients who had hypotension than in those who did not (p <0.001 for all comparisons). We concluded that hypotension that occurred in >25% of patients who had AAD was associated with a much higher rate of in-hospital adverse events. Our study also identified factors associated with hypotension in patients who had AAD.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

Impact of age on management and outcome of acute coronary syndrome: observations from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based cardiac therapies are underutilized in elderly patients. We assessed differences in practice patterns, comorbidities, and in-hospital event rates, by age and type of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We studied 24165 ACS patients in 102 hospitals in 14 countries stratified by age. RESULTS: Approximately two-thirds of patients were men, but this proportion decreased with age. In elderly patients (> or = 65 years), history of angina, transient ischemic attack/stroke, myocardial infarction(MI), congestive heart failure, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, hypertension or atrial fibrillation were more common, and delay in seeking medical attention and non-ST-segment elevation MI were significantly higher. Aspirin, beta-blockers, thrombolytic therapy, statins and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were prescribed less, while calcium antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors were prescribed more often to elderly patients. Unfractionated heparin was prescribed more often in young patients, while low-molecular-weight heparins were similarly prescribed across all age groups. Coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention rates significantly decreased with age. The rate of CABG surgery was highest among patients aged 65-74 years (8.1%) and 55-64 years (7.7%), but reduced in the youngest (4.7%) and oldest (2.7%) groups. Major bleeding rates were 2-3% among patients aged < 65 years, and > 6% in those > or = 85 years. Hospital-mortality rates, adjusted for baseline risk differences, increased with age (odds ratio: 15.7 in patients > or = 85 years compared with those < 45 years). CONCLUSIONS: Many elderly ACS patients do not receive evidence-based therapies, highlighting the need for clinical trials targeted specifically at elderly cohorts, and quality-of-care programs that reinforce the use of such therapies among these individuals.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience.

BACKGROUND: Surgical mortality for acute type A aortic dissection reported in different experiences from single centers or surgeons varies from 7% to 30%. The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection, collecting patients from 18 referral centers worldwide, identifies a preoperative risk stratification scheme and a real average surgical mortality for acute type A aortic dissection in the current era. METHODS: A comprehensive analysis was completed of 290 clinical variables and their relationship to surgical outcomes in 526 of 1032 patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection from 1996 through 2001. Extracted cases, categorized according to risk profile, were defined as unstable (group I) in the presence of cardiac tamponade; shock; congestive heart failure; cerebrovascular accident; stroke; coma; myocardial ischemia, infarction, or both; electrocardiograms with new Q waves or ST elevation; acute renal failure; or mesenteric ischemia-infarction at the time of the operation. Outside of an unstable condition, patients were categorized as stable (group II). RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality was 25.1%. Mortality in group I was 31.4% compared with 16.7% in group II ( P < .001). Independent preoperative predictors of operative mortality were history of aortic valve replacement (odds ratio = 3.12), migrating chest pain (odds ratio = 2.77), hypotension as sign of acute type A aortic dissection (odds ratio = 1.95), shock or tamponade (odds ratio = 2.69), preoperative cardiac tamponade (odds ratio = 2.22), and preoperative limb ischemia (odds ratio = 2.10). CONCLUSIONS: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience confirms that patient selection plays an important role in determining surgical outcomes in patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Knowledge of significant risk factors for operative mortality can contribute to better management and a more defined risk assessment in patients affected by acute type A aortic dissection.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

The winter peak in the occurrence of acute aortic dissection is independent of climate.

We recently reported the existence of a higher risk of acute aortic dissection (AAD) during the winter months. However, it is not known whether this winter peak is affected by climate. To address this issue, we evaluated data from 969 AAD patients who were enrolled at various sites around the globe and who were participating in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD). We found a significant (p = 0.001; chi2 test) difference in the number of AAD events occurring during the different seasons of the year, with highest incidence in winter (28.4%) and lowest incidence in summer (19.9%). Furthermore, the winter peak was evident in both cold and temperate climate settings, suggesting that the relative change in temperature, rather than absolute temperature, and/or endogenous annual rhythms are critical mechanistic factors.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2005

Does circadian and seasonal variation in occurrence of acute aortic dissection influence in-hospital outcomes?

The risk of acute aortic dissection (AAD) exhibits chronobiological variations with peak onset in the morning and in winter. However, it is not known whether the time of day or season of the year of the AAD affects clinical outcomes. We studied 1,032 patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection from January 1997 to December 2001. For circadian and seasonal analysis, the time and date of symptom onset were available for 741 and 1,007 patients, respectively, and were grouped into four 6h periods (morning, afternoon, evening, and night) and four seasons (winter, spring, summer, and autumn). The chi2 test for goodness of fit was used to evaluate non-uniformity of the time of day and time of year for critical in-hospital clinical events, including death. While highest incidence of AAD occurred in the morning and winter, clinical events (including mortality) were similar during the four different periods of the 24 h (chi2 = 1.9, p = 0.60) and seasonal (chi2 = 1.2, p = 0.75) periods.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization after-primary percutaneous coronary intervention: patients at risk and their outcomes.

Clinical and angiographic correlates of ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (ITVR) in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) are currently less well known. Accordingly, we examined 2,981 patients enrolled in different Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction trials, who underwent primary PCI to evaluate risk factors and outcomes of individuals requiring subsequent ITVR. At 6 months, ITVR was required in 321 patients (11%). Compared to the cohort without ITVR, patients requiring ITVR were younger (P=0.036), females (P=0.018), and more likely to have systolic blood pressure >100 mmHg on presentation (P=0.022), family history of premature coronary artery disease (P=0.035), and postprocedure dissection (P=0.001). In contrast, Killip Class >I on presentation (P=0.05), left circumflex as infarct-related artery (P=0.022), and the use of ticlopidine (P=0.044) and stents (p=0.057) were less frequent among ITVR patients. Multivariate analysis identified younger age (for each 10-year decrease, odds ratio [OR], 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.32), female gender (OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.05-1.89), and final dissection (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.23-2.33) as independent risk factors for ITVR. In-hospital reinfarction (P < 0.001) was increased and at 6 months remained higher in ITVR patients; in-hospital and 6-month mortality did not differ between the two groups. Our study identifies the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of patients requiring ITVR after primary PCI. Importantly, our data suggest that no increase in mortality occur, if ITVR is promptly performed to treat recurrent ischemia after primary PCI.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗

PubMed2004

Procedural success versus clinical risk status in determining discharge of patients after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether patients' clinical status, angioplasty success, or both, should guide discharge after primary angioplasty (i.e., percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). BACKGROUND: Current guidelines do not address a discharge strategy for AMI patients undergoing successful PCI. METHODS: Patients who underwent PCI in Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) studies (N = 3,188) were classified as "high clinical risk" if they had either age >70 years, Killip class >1, heart rate >100 beats/min, systolic blood pressure <100 mm Hg, anterior MI, or left bundle branch block, and as "low clinical risk" if none was present. Successful PCI patients were compared with those with unsuccessful PCI in both groups for 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: Percutaneous coronary intervention was successful in 668 (90%) of 745 low-risk clinical and 2,104 (86%) of 2,443 high-risk clinical patients. Regardless of clinical risk status, patients with successful PCI had lower 30-day MACE than those with unsuccessful PCI (low-risk group: 4.6% vs. 22%, p < 0.0001; high-risk group: 7% vs. 21%; p < 0.0001). Moreover, successful PCI patients with either risk status had few MACE after day 4, whereas unsuccessful PCI patients had more MACE. The success of PCI was the strongest independent predictor of 30-day MACE (odds ratio [OR] 3.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 5.0). A constellation of three or more high-risk clinical features also predicted higher 30-day MACE (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.12). CONCLUSIONS: The success of PCI is the prime determinant of clinical outcome after PCI for AMI. The majority of AMI patients with less than three high-risk clinical features who undergo successful PCI may be discharged from the hospital by day 4. In contrast, patients with more than two high-risk clinical features or unsuccessful PCI may need longer observation.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Differences in clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of acute type a aortic dissection in patients with and without previous cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: There are less data on the clinical and diagnostic imaging characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients with previous cardiac surgery (PCS) presenting with acute type A aortic dissection (AAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: In 617 patients with AAD, we evaluated the differences in the clinical characteristics, management, and in-hospital outcomes of the cohorts with and without PCS. A history of PCS was present in 100 of 617 patients. Patients with PCS were more likely to be males (P=0.02), older (P=0.014), and to have a history of previous aortic dissection (P<0.001) or aneurysms (P<0.001). In contrast, PCS patients were less likely to have presenting chest pain (P<0.001). Cardiac tamponade was less common in PCS patients (P=0.007). Fewer AAD patients with PCS underwent surgical repair (P=0.001). Hospital mortality was not adversely influenced by PCS (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 2.63), but a trend for increased death was seen in patients with previous aortic valve replacement (AVR) (OR, 2.31; 95% CI, 0.98 to 5.43). Age 70 years or older, previous AVR, shock, and renal failure identified PCS patients at risk for death. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights differences in clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of AAD patients with PCS. Importantly, PCS, with the exception of previous AVR, does not adversely influence early outcomes of AAD patients, including those undergoing surgical repair. However, because of otherwise dismal outcomes with medical management of AAD, our data indicate that a history of PCS (even that of previous AVR) should not preclude physicians from recommending surgical correction of type A aortic dissection in appropriate patients.

Acute Kidney Injury↗