Implications of postoperative pruritus.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Rajesh Mahajan.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: Centroneuraxial and parenteral administration of ketamine has been shown to produce analgesia. However, this analgesia is limited by adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to determine whether ketamine alone or in combination with bupivacaine provides superior pain relief after surgery in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy. METHODS: Sixty patients (classified as ASA status I or II) under-going arthroscopic meniscus repair during general anesthesia were randomized to receive 1.0 mg x kg(-1) ketamine (Group K), 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B) or a combination of 1.0 mg x kg(-1) ketamine and 0.25% bupivacaine (Group BK) to a total volume of 20 mL by intra-articular route following surgery. Visual analogue score in the postanesthesia care unit at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hr after surgery, duration of analgesia and subsequent 24 hr consumption of rescue analgesic (dextroproxyphene/acetaminophen) were evaluated. RESULTS: The results showed significantly higher pain scores in Group K as compared to Group B and Group BK. The duration of analgesia was significantly shorter in Group K as compared to the other two groups (Group B = 5.7 +/- 0.8; Group BK = 5.1 +/- 1.1 vs Group K = 1.7 +/- 0.9 hr; P < 0.05). However, 24 hr consumption of analgesic was similar in the three groups. CONCLUSION: We conclude that intra-articular bupivacaine-ketamine combination provides better pain relief than intra-articular ketamine after day care arthroscopic knee surgery.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To report a case of unusual difficult intubation secondary to oral submucosal fibrosis (SMF) associated with malignancy of the hypopharynx. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 57-yr-old male, ASA-I physical status presented for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. The patient was a known alcoholic and smoker with a habit of chewing quids for the past 36 years. Airway assessment revealed oral SMF and slight difficulty in opening the mouth fully. Mentohyoid and mentothyroid distances were normal. However, during intubation, unanticipated difficulty was encountered. On direct laryngoscopy, the tip of the epiglottis could barely be visualized. Intubation was possible after passing a gum elastic bougie blindly under the epiglottis and negotiating a 7.0 internal diameter tracheal tube over it. Postoperatively, indirect laryngoscopy (IDL) showed severe SMF involving the oral cavity, epiglottis and pyriform fossae and an ulcerative malignancy of the hypopharynx with fixation of the left hemilarynx. CONCLUSION: SMF is a premalignant condition of the oral cavity associated with fibrosis of involved structures that can be associated with malignancy of the aerodigestive tract. Distortion of the airway anatomy may render intubation difficult. IDL maybe useful in the preoperative evaluation of these patients.