Biomedical subjects

Rajiv Mallick

Publications and source records attributed to Rajiv Mallick.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

Cost and effectiveness of venlafaxine extended-release and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the acute phase of outpatient treatment for major depressive disorder.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this retrospective analysis was to estimate the cost and effectiveness of venlafaxine extended-release (VXR) compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the outpatient treatment of major depressive disorder. METHODS: Pooled data from 8, 8-week, randomized, double-blind studies comparing treatment of major depressive disorder with venlafaxine/venlafaxine XR (n = 851), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine; n = 748), or placebo (4 studies; n = 446) were retrospectively analyzed to determine the economic implications of symptom remission from the perspective of a US third party payer and that of an employer. A decision modeling approach was used to determine cost and effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Patients on VXR were associated with 22.8 depression-free days versus 18.6 depression-free days with the studied selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, based on the decision model. Productive and quality-adjusted days were also expected to increase for VXR patients (22.06 vs. 19.34 and 4.56 to 9.36 vs. 3.72 to 7.63), as was the percentage of patients achieving full activity (25.9% vs. 19.6%). The expected cost per patient achieving remission of symptoms was US 1303.94 dollars and US 1514.96 dollars, and the cost per depression-free days was US 25.66 dollars and US 28.25 dollars, for the VXR and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with VXR is not only expected to increase the rate of remission of symptoms but is also associated with achievement of full activity, higher number of depression-free days, productive days, and quality-adjusted days. VXR is a cost-effective treatment option for major depressive disorder.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2003

Depression-free days as a summary measure of the temporal pattern of response and remission in the treatment of major depression: a comparison of venlafaxine, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and placebo.

BACKGROUND: This article develops and applies depression-free days (DFDs) as a summary measure of the temporal pattern of response and remission in a comparison of venlafaxine (a dual-action serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor) with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and placebo. METHOD: Weekly data on the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-17) from 2046 patients with DSM-III-R/IV-established moderate-to-severe major depression, participating in 1 of 8 randomized, double-blind, controlled studies that compared venlafaxine with an SSRI (fluoxetine, paroxetine, or fluvoxamine) or with both placebo and an SSRI, were used to estimate DFDs. Maximum DFDs were imputed to maintained HAM-D-17 scores < or = 7 (asymptomatic depression) over time, minimum DFDs to persistent HAM-D-17 scores > or = 15 (acutely symptomatic depression), and prorated DFDs to intermediate HAM-D-17 scores. A secondary construct was developed to test sensitivity to a less stringent upper threshold of acutely symptomatic depression (HAM-D-17 score > or = 22). Using a tertiary construct, sensitivity to a more stringent lower threshold representing elimination of residual symptoms was also evaluated. The construct validity of the primary and the secondary DFDs measures was assessed in terms of their correlation with sustained low clinical global severity of illness (scores of 1 or 2 on the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale). for each construct, DFDs were compared across the 3 treatment groups and corresponding effect sizes were generated. RESULTS: Overall, sustained low clinical global severity of illness was associated with 38.3 median (interquartile range, 29.8 to 44.2) DFDs relative to 5.7 (interquartile range, 0 to 20.6) median DFDs associated with nonsustained low clinical global severity; similar differences emerged in terms of sustained asymptomatic depression. The venlafaxine group (N = 851) experienced a median of 18.8 (interquartile range, 0.4 to 34.6) DFDs compared with a median of 13.6 (interquartile range, 0 to 29.8) DFDs in the SSRI group (N = 749) and 7.4 (interquartile range, 0 to 26.2) DFDs in the placebo group (N = 446) (p <.0001 overall; venlafaxine vs. SSRIs, p =.0015, effect size = 0.2; venlafaxine vs. placebo, p <.0001, effect size = 0.4; and SSRIs vs. placebo, p =.0007, effect size = 0.2). The secondary and tertiary DFDs constructs yielded similar, albeit narrower, differences in all comparisons. CONCLUSION: The construct of DFDs was found to be a useful summary measure of sustained remission. Active treatments were associated with more DFDs than placebo, and venlafaxine with more DFDs than SSRIs, consistent with corresponding differences in sustained remission.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

The outcomes and costs of acute myeloid leukemia among the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) among the elderly can be expected to grow as the population continues to age. However, data on current treatment practices and costs for this form of cancer are sparse. METHODS: We used a retrospective inception cohort design and data from a linkage between 11 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results cancer registries and Medicare administrative claims. We evaluated survival, use of health care resources, use of chemotherapy, and Medicare payments among adults 65 years and older with an initial diagnosis of AML between January 1, 1991, and December 31, 1996. RESULTS: A total of 2657 elderly patients with AML and complete Medicare claims data were identified. The prognosis for these patients was poor, with median survival estimated to be 2 months and a 2-year survival rate of 6%. Mean +/- SE total Medicare payments were $41,594 +/- $870 (in 1998 US dollars), 84% of which was attributed to inpatient payments. In the 2 years after the AML diagnosis, 790 patients (30%) underwent chemotherapy treatment. These patients had costs almost 3 times higher than those of other patients, and their median survival was 6 months longer. The use of hospice care was rare (17% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Among the elderly, AML is associated with a poor prognosis and substantial costs during the relatively few remaining months of life. Moreover, most patients do not receive active treatment with chemotherapy or hospice services. Further work is needed to characterize this disease and the patient-related factors that influence treatment decisions and associated health outcomes.

Acute Disease↗

PubMed2002

Outcomes in patients treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin for relapsed acute myelogenous leukemia.

The outcomes of treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin compared with those of conventional chemotherapy for relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) were studied. The gemtuzumab ozogamicin group consisted of 104 patients treated in 15 U.S. and 25 European centers for first relapse of AML between May 1997 and December 1998. Conventional chemotherapy recipients consisted of 22 historical control patients who received treatment for their first occurrence of AML at a Boston teaching hospital between January 1991 and December 1994 and who subsequently underwent conventional inpatient reinduction chemotherapy for relapse. Patients in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group received a two-hour i.v. infusion of 9 mg/m2 for up to three doses with at least two weeks between doses, while the historical controls received conventional chemotherapy, usually consisting of continuous-infusion cytarabine (days 1-7) plus mitoxantrone. Outcomes evaluated included differences in survival and hospitalization (occurrence and duration) for up to six weeks. Both stratified and multivariate regression methods were used in making comparisons. Adjusting for baseline differences, six-week survival rates were similar in the two groups (95% for the historical control group versus 89% for the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group). However, gemtuzumab ozogamicin recipients had significantly fewer total hospital days (adjusted mean, 19 days, versus 35 days), which was consistent with the higher prevalence of outpatient chemotherapy in this group (43% versus 0% among the historical controls). The difference in the number of hospital days was consistent across various baseline and demographic factors. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin appeared to be associated with equivalent survival and fewer total days of hospitalization than conventional chemotherapy in adults with relapsed AML.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Identifying cancer relapse using SEER-Medicare data.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor registries capture valid information at the time of cancer diagnosis, but often do not conduct longitudinal follow-up evaluations. However, investigators may be interested in questions relating to subsequent relapsed disease. Linking administrative data to registry data, as in the creation of the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) and Medicare data set, can provide the ability to infer the occurrence of relapse in selected situations. METHODS: The authors created different algorithms to detect relapse of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). A retrospective cohort of patients with AML was identified, and both their billing data and medical records were obtained. The algorithms were then applied to the billing data, the results were compared with medical record review. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were identified, of whom 22 were treated for relapsed AML. The sensitivity of the best algorithm for detecting relapse was 86%, and the specificity 99%, with a positive predictive value of 95% and a negative predictive value of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of relapse from SEER-Medicare data using clinical algorithms is feasible for cancers where a majority of patients receive treatment for relapse, without a "watch and wait" strategy, and where that treatment is with a modality that can be detected in billing data (ie, intravenous chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, or all three). Optimal analytic situations are ones in which the investigator is mostly interested in positive predictive value, less interested in sensitivity, and wants to evaluate outcomes among those patients who receive treatment for their relapsed disease. However, the accuracy of such an approach for cancers other than AML has not yet been established.

Aged↗