PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Raju Tomer

Publications and source records attributed to Raju Tomer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Different mechanisms of cyclin D1 overexpression in multiple myeloma revealed by fluorescence in situ hybridization and quantitative analysis of mRNA levels.

The t(11;14)(q13;q32) is the most common translocation in multiple myeloma (MM), resulting in up-regulation of cyclin D1. We used a segregation fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay to detect t(11;14) breakpoints in primary MM cases and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to quantify cyclin D1 and MYEOV (myeloma overexpressed) expression, another putative oncogene located on chromosome 11q13. High levels of cyclin D1 mRNA (cyclin D1/TBP [TATA box binding protein] ratio > 95) were found exclusively in the presence of a t(11;14) translocation (11/48 cases; P <.00001). In addition, a subgroup of MM cases (15/48) with intermediate to low cyclin D1 mRNA (cyclin D1/TBP ratio between 2.3 and 20) was identified. FISH analysis ruled out a t(11; 14) translocation and 11q13 amplification in these cases; however, in 13 of 15 patients a chromosome 11 polysomy was demonstrated (P <.0001). These results indicate an effect of gene dosage as an alternative mechanism of cyclin D1 deregulation in MM. The absence of chromosome 11 abnormalities in 2 of 15 patients with intermediate cyclin D1 expression supports that there are presumably other mechanism(s) of cyclin D1 deregulation in MM patients. Our data indicate that deregulation of MYEOV is not favored in MM and further strengthens the role of cyclin D1 overexpression in lymphoid malignancies with a t(11;14)(q13;q32) translocation.

Chromosomes, Human, Pair 11↗

Tumor-associated E-cadherin mutations do not induce Wnt target gene expression, but affect E-cadherin repressors.

E-cadherin is a cell-cell adhesion molecule and tumor invasion suppressor gene that is frequently altered in human cancers. It interacts through its cytoplasmic domain with beta-catenin which in turn interacts with the Wnt (wingless) signaling pathway. We have compared the effects of different tumor-derived E-cadherin variants with those of normal E-cadherin on Wnt signaling and on genes involved in epithelial mesenchymal transition. We established an in-house cDNA microarray composed of 1105 different, sequence verified cDNA probes corresponding to 899 unique genes that represent the majority of genes known to be involved in cadherin-dependent cell adhesion and signaling ('Adhesion/Signaling Array'). The expression signatures of E-cadherin-negative MDA-MB-435S cancer cells transfected with E-cadherin variants (in frame deletions of exon 8 or 9, D8 or D9, respectively, or a point mutation in exon 8 (D370A)) were compared to that of wild-type E-cadherin (WT) transfected cells. From the differentially expressed genes, we selected 38 that we subsequently analyzed by quantitative real-time RT-PCR and/or Northern Blot. A total of 92% of these were confirmed as differentially expressed. Most of these genes encode proteins of the cytoskeleton, cadherins/integrins, oncogenes and matrix metalloproteases. No significant expression differences of genes downstream of the Wnt-pathway were found, except in E-cadherin D8 transfected cells where upregulation of three Tcf/Lef-transcribed genes was seen. One possible reason for the lack of expression differences of the Tcf/Lef-regulated genes is upregulation of SFRP1 and SFRP3; both of which are competitive inhibitors of the Wnt proteins. Interestingly, known E-cadherin transcriptional repressors, such as SLUG (SNAI2), SIP1 (ZEB2), TWIST1, SNAIL (SNAI1) and ZEB1 (TCF8), but not E12/E47 (TCF3), had a lack of upregulation in cells expressing mutated E-cadherin compared to WT. In conclusion, E-cadherin mutations have no influence on expression of genes involved in Wnt-signaling, but they may promote their own expression by blocking upregulation of E-cadherin repressors.

Animals↗

A physicochemical model for analyzing DNA sequences.

In search of an ab initio model to characterize DNA sequences as genes and nongenes, we examined some physicochemical properties of each trinucleotide (codon), which could accomplish this task. We constructed three-dimensional vectors for each double-helical trinucleotide sequence considering hydrogen-bonding energy, stacking energy, and a third parameter, which we provisionally identified with DNA-protein interactions. As this three-dimensional vector moves along any genome, the net orientation of the resultant vector should differ significantly for gene and nongene regions to make a distinction feasible, if the underlying model has some merits. An analysis of 331 prokaryotic genomes comprising a total of 294 786 experimentally verified genes (nonoverlapping) and an equal number of nongenes presents a proof of concept of the model without the need for further parametrization. Also, initial analyses on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Arabidopsis thaliana suggest that the methodology is extendable to eukaryotes. The physicochemical model (ChemGenome1.0) introduced has the potential to be developed into a gene-finding algorithm and, more pressingly, could be employed for an independent assessment of the annotation of DNA sequences.

Bacteria↗