Biomedical subjects

Ralf Bensberg

Publications and source records attributed to Ralf Bensberg.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Effects of partial ventilatory support modalities on respiratory function in severe hypoxemic lung injury.

OBJECTIVE: The early phase of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by impaired respiratory mechanics, ventilation-perfusion mismatch, and severe hypoxemia. Partial ventilatory support can effectively unload the respiratory workload and improve pulmonary gas exchange with less hemodynamic compromise. The partial ventilatory support mode most indicated in early phases of ARDS has not been determined. This study compares the effects of assisted ventilatory techniques on breathing pattern, gas exchange, hemodynamic function, and respiratory effort with those of controlled mechanical ventilation in similarly sedated subjects. DESIGN: Prospectively randomized crossover animal study. SETTING: Animal research laboratory. SUBJECTS: Eleven anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. INTERVENTIONS: Acute lung injury was induced by lung lavage. Pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), pressure-controlled assisted ventilation (P-ACV), bilevel positive airway pressure (BIPAP), and pressure support ventilation (PSV) with equal airway pressures and sedation were applied in random order. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Gas exchange, respiratory effort, and hemodynamic function were measured, and ventilation-perfusion distributions were calculated by multiple inert-gas-elimination techniques. The results revealed that partial ventilatory support was superior to PCV in maintaining adequate oxygenation and hemodynamic function with reduced sedation. The effects of P-ACV, BIPAP, and PSV were comparable with respect to gas exchange and hemodynamic function, except for a more pronounced reduction in shunt during BIPAP. P-ACV and PSV were superior to BIPAP to reduce respiratory drive and work of breathing. PSV affected the pattern of breathing and deadspace to a greater degree than did P-ACV. CONCLUSIONS: In acute lung injury, P-ACV preserves oxygenation and hemodynamic function with less respiratory effort compared with BIPAP and reduces the need for sedation compared with PCV.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Ventilation with biphasic positive airway pressure in experimental lung injury. Influence of transpulmonary pressure on gas exchange and haemodynamics.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether improvement in ventilation perfusion (.V(A)/.Q) distribution during mechanical ventilation using biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) with spontaneous breathing may be attributed to an effectively increased transpulmonary pressure (P(TP)) and can also be achieved by increasing P(TP) during controlled ventilation. DESIGN: In 12 pigs with saline lavage-induced lung injury we compared the effects of BIPAP to pressure-controlled ventilation with equal airway pressure (PCV(AW)) or equal transpulmonary pressure (PCV(TP)) on V(A)/.Q distribution assessed by the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). SETTING: Animal laboratory study. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Intrapulmonary shunt was 33+/-11% during BIPAP, 36+/-10% during PCV(AW) and 33+/-15% during PCV(TP) ( p= n.s.). BIPAP resulted in higher PaO(2) than PCV(AW) (188+/-83 versus 147+/-82 mmHg, p < 0.05), but not than PCV(TP) (187+/-139 mmHg). Oxygen delivery was significantly higher during BIPAP (530+/-109 ml/min) versus 374+/-113 ml/min during PCV(AW) and 353+/-93 ml/min during PCV(TP) ( p < 0.005). Tidal volume with PCV(TP) increased to 11.9+/-2.3 ml/kg, compared to 8.5+/-0.8 with BIPAP and 7.6+/-1.4 with PCV(AW) ( p <0.001) and cardiac output decreased to 3.5+/-0.6 l/min (BIPAP 4.9+/-0.8 and PCV(AW) 3.9+/-0.8, p<0.006). CONCLUSIONS: In experimental lung injury, BIPAP with preserved spontaneous breathing was effective in increasing regional P(TP), since pressure-controlled ventilation with the same P(TP) resulted in similar gas exchange effects. However, PCV(TP) caused increased airway pressures and tidal volumes, whereby, with BIPAP, less depression of oxygen delivery and cardiac output were observed. BIPAP could be useful in maintaining pulmonary gas exchange and slightly improving oxygenation without interfering with circulation as strongly as PCV does.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Ventilation-perfusion distribution related to different inspiratory flow patterns in experimental lung injury.

UNLABELLED: In acute lung injury (ALI), controlled mechanical ventilation with decelerating inspiratory flow (.V(dec)) has been suggested to improve oxygenation when compared with constant flow (.V(con)) by improving the distribution of ventilation and perfusion (.V(A)/.Q). We performed the present study to test this hypothesis in an animal model of ALI. Furthermore, the effects of combined decelerating and constant flow (Vdot;(deco)) were evaluated. Thus, 18 pigs with experimental ALI were randomized to receive mechanical ventilation with either .V(con), .V(dec) or a fixed combination of both flow wave forms (.V(deco)) at the same tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure level for 6 h. Hemodynamics, gas exchange, and .V(A)/.Q distribution were determined. The results revealed an improvement of oxygenation resulting from a decrease of pulmonary shunt within each group (P < 0.05). However, blood flow to lung areas with a normal .V(A)/.Q distribution increased only during ventilation with .V(con) (P < 0.05). Accordingly, PaO(2) was higher with .V(con) than with .V(dec) and .V(deco) (P < 0.05). We conclude that contrary to the hypothesis, .V(con)provides a more favorable .V(A)/.Q distribution, and hence better oxygenation, when compared with .V(dec) and .V(deco) in this model of ALI. IMPLICATIONS: In acute lung injury, mechanical ventilation with decelerating flow has been suggested to improve ventilation-perfusion distribution when compared with constant flow. We tested this hypothesis in an animal model. Contrary to the hypothesis, we found a more favorable ventilation-perfusion distribution during constant flow when compared with decelerating flow.

Airway Resistance↗

PubMed2002

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in experimental lung injury: effects on gas exchange.

OBJECTIVE: To compare ventilation-perfusion (V(A)/Q) distributions during improvement of oxygenation caused by high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and pressure-controlled mechanical ventilation with high PEEP levels (CMV) in experimental acute lung injury (ALI). DESIGN: Prospective, controlled animal study. SETTING: Animal research facility of a university hospital. INTERVENTIONS: Twelve pigs with oleic acid-induced ALI were randomised to HFOV ( n=6) or to CMV ( n=6) with a PEEP of 15 mbar for 1 h. The mean airway pressure was adjusted in both groups to achieve comparable improvements in arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO(2)) and to avoid clinically relevant impairments of cardiac output, as assured by adequate mixed venous oxygen saturation and lactate levels. V(A)/Q distributions were determined by the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Arterial oxygen partial pressure improved during CMV with a mean airway pressure of 20 mbar ( p<0.05) whereas HFOV revealed comparable improvements with a mean airway pressure of 40 mbar ( p<0.05). Shunt decreased and blood flow to normal V(A)/Q areas increased due to CMV and HFOV ( p<0.05). The perfusion of low V(A)/Q areas remained unchanged. Statistical analysis did not reveal differences of PaO(2), shunt or blood flow to low V(A)/Q areas between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this model of acute lung injury CMV and HFOV improved gas exchange due to similar changes in V(A)/Q distribution. However, mean airway pressure had to be adjusted twofold higher during HFOV then during CMV to achieve comparable improvements in gas exchange.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Pressure support compared with controlled mechanical ventilation in experimental lung injury.

UNLABELLED: It has been suggested that, in acute lung injury (ALI), spontaneous breathing activity may increase oxygenation because of an improvement of ventilation-perfusion distribution. Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is one of the assisted spontaneous breathing modes often used in critical care medicine. We sought to determine the prolonged effects of PSV on gas exchange in experimental ALI. We hypothesized that PSV may increase oxygenation because of an improvement in ventilation-perfusion distribution. Thus, ALI was induced in 20 pigs by using repetitive lung lavage. Thereafter, the animals were randomized to receive either PSV with a pressure level set to achieve a tidal volume >4 mL/kg and a respiratory rate <40 min(-1) (n = 10) or controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) with a tidal volume of 10 mL/kg and a respiratory rate of 20 min(-1) (n = 10). Positive end-expiratory pressure was set at 10 cm H(2)O in both groups. Blood gas analyses and determination of ventilation-perfusion (.V(A)/.Q) distribution were performed at the onset of ALI and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 h. The main result was an improvement of oxygenation because of a decrease of pulmonary shunt and an increase of areas with normal .V(A)/.Q ratios during PSV (P < 0.005). However, during CMV, a more pronounced reduction of shunt was observed compared with PSV (P < 0.005). We conclude that, in this model of ALI, PSV improves gas exchange because of a reduction of .V(A)/.Q inequality. However, improvements in .V(A)/.Q distribution may be more effective with CMV than with PSV. IMPLICATIONS: Assisted spontaneous breathing may have beneficial effects on gas exchange in acute lung injury. We tested this hypothesis for pressure support ventilation in an animal model of acute lung injury. Our results demonstrate that pressure support does not necessarily provide better gas exchange than controlled mechanical ventilation.

Air Pressure↗