Biomedical subjects

Ralf Schulze

Publications and source records attributed to Ralf Schulze.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Emotional intelligence, personality, and task-induced stress.

Emotional intelligence (EI) may predict stress responses and coping strategies in a variety of applied settings. This study compares EI and the personality factors of the Five Factor Model (FFM) as predictors of task-induced stress responses. Participants (N = 200) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 task conditions, 3 of which were designed to be stressful. Results confirmed that low EI was related to worry states and avoidance coping, even with the FFM statistically controlled. However, EI was not specifically related to task-induced changes in stress state. Results also confirmed that Neuroticism related to distress, worry, and emotion-focused coping, and Conscientiousness predicted use of task-focused coping. The applied utility of EI and personality measures is discussed.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2006

Exploring the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) with established emotions measures.

Emotions measures represent an important means of obtaining construct validity evidence for emotional intelligence (EI) tests because they have the same theoretical underpinnings. Additionally, the extent to which both emotions and EI measures relate to intelligence is poorly understood. The current study was designed to address these issues. Participants (N = 138) completed the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT), two emotions measures, as well as four intelligence tests. Results provide mixed support for the model hypothesized to underlie the MSCEIT, with emotions research and EI measures failing to load on the same factor. The emotions measures loaded on the same factor as intelligence measures. The validity of certain EI components (in particular, Emotion Perception), as currently assessed, appears equivocal.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Working memory and intelligence--their correlation and their relation: comment on Ackerman, Beier, and Boyle (2005).

On the basis of a meta-analysis of pairwise correlations between working memory tasks and cognitive ability measures, P. L. Ackerman, M. E. Beier, and M. O. Boyle (2005; see record 2004-22408-002) claimed that working memory capacity (WMC) shares less than 25% of its variance with general intelligence (g) and with reasoning ability. In this comment, the authors argue that this is an underestimation because of several methodological shortcomings and biases. A reanalysis of the data reported in Ackerman et al. using the correct statistical procedures demonstrates that g and WMC are very highly correlated. On a conceptual level, the authors point out that WMC should be regarded as an explanatory construct for intellectual abilities. Theories of working memory do not claim that WMC is isomorphic with intelligence factors but that it is a very strong predictor of reasoning ability and also predicts general fluid intelligence and g.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

Determination of projection geometry from quantitative assessment of the distortion of spherical references in single-view projection radiography.

A method is introduced, inferring the three-dimensional (3-D) location from the 2-D radiographic shadow of an opaque spherical reference body of known radius by considering its elliptical distortion, the 2-D shadow location and a known source-to-receptor distance. Three noncollinear spheres fixed to a rigid object constitute all possible degrees of freedom, i.e., the entire 3-D imaging geometry. The method may be used (a) to determine the 3-D imaging geometry from a single 2-D view and (b) to correct for foreshortening of object distances coplanar with the plane defined by the sphere triplet. Apart from the mathematical background the article describes a small feasibility experiment, performed with four different sphere diameters and a commercial dental ccd-receptor system (pixel length: 0.0195 mm). The mouse-cursor based image evaluation revealed an average underestimation of the critical depth- (x-) coordinate decreasing with increasing radius (-30.3% for r=0.5 mm to 2.8% for r=2.5 mm). Intraobserver reliability (the standard deviation between three single cursor-based assessments) ranged between 0% and 8% of the actual true depth. The main source of the input error is associated with the assessment of the amount of elliptical distortion, where subpixel accuracy is demanded. Consequently, software-based automated image evaluation is required using available methods for pattern recognition and point-spread correction. Provided sufficient accuracy, the method provides an important tool for foreshortening correction, depth assessment, motion analysis, and 3-D reconstruction from two or more 2-D views.

Algorithms↗