PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ramón Mantilla

Publications and source records attributed to Ramón Mantilla.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A randomized comparison of sirolimus-eluting stent with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis: results of the Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) trial.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge. METHODS: The Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) study is a multicenter randomized trial conducted in 150 patients with ISR (76 allocated to SES and 74 to balloon angioplasty [BA]). The primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at nine months. Secondary end points included prespecified subgroup analysis, lumen volume on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and a composite of major clinical events at one year. RESULTS: Angiographic success was obtained in all patients. At 9-month angiographic follow-up (96% of eligible patients) minimal lumen diameter was larger (2.52 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 2.09 to 2.81] vs. 1.54 mm [IQR 0.91 to 2.05]; p < 0.001) and recurrent restenosis rate was lower (11% vs. 39%; p < 0.001) in the SES group. Prespecified subgroup analyses were consistent with the main outcome measure. Lumen volume on IVUS at 9 months was also larger (279 mm3 [IQR 227 to 300] vs. 197 mm3 [IQR 177 to 230]; p < 0.001) in the SES group. At one-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), the event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) was significantly improved in the SES group (88% vs. 69%; p < 0.004) as the result of a lower requirement for target vessel revascularization (11% vs. 30%; p < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, the use of SES provides superior long-term clinical, angiographic, and IVUS outcome than BA treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Value of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association angiographic classification of coronary lesion morphology in patients with in-stent restenosis. Insights from the Restenosis Intra-stent Balloon angioplasty versus elective Stenting (RIBS) randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The implications of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) lesion classification in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) are unknown. METHODS: Four hundred fifty patients included in the RIBS randomized study were analyzed. A centralized core laboratory assessed ISR classifications including ACC/AHA, the classification of Mehran et al (Circulation 1999;100:1872-8), diffuse/focal, and a new quantitative ISR index (lesion length/stent length). Logistic regression models were constructed for prespecified outcome measures including (1) unsatisfactory acute results and (2) recurrent restenosis rate. RESULTS: Complex (B2/C) lesions (78%) more frequently obtained unsatisfactory acute results (20% vs 8%, P = .007), smaller minimal lumen diameter after the procedure (2.45 +/- 0.5 vs 2.73 +/- 0.5 mm, P = .001) and at follow-up (1.48 +/- 0.8 vs 1.94 +/- 0.8 mm, P = .0001), and had a higher restenosis rate (43 vs 24%, P = .001) than simple (A/B1) lesions. On logistic regression analysis, all classification schemes were useful to predict unsatisfactory initial results (area under the curve: 0.63, 0.61, 0.59, and 0.62) and recurrent restenosis (area under the curve: 0.60, 0.64, 0.61, and 0.63). The predictive ability of these schemes persisted despite adjustment for potential confounders. Although the ACC/AHA classification was a better predictor of acute results, the classification of Mehran was superior to predict restenosis. CONCLUSIONS: The ACC/AHA classification provides a useful tool to determine acute procedural results and the long-term angiographic outcome of patients with ISR.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

[Congenital apical left ventricular aneurysm].

Congenital ventricular aneurysm is an infrequently occurring disease entity that usually affects the left ventricle. Its etiopathology is unknown. Clinical presentation is variable, and the condition is potentially lethal in some cases. Various imaging techniques are useful in diagnosis and enable the condition to be differentiated from congenital left diverticulum. We present a patient with a calcified congenital ventricular aneurysm who presented with supraventricular and ventricular arrhythmias and who was treated by surgical resection.

Female↗
PubMed2005

[Relationship between coronary flow and viability in patients with myocardial infarction submitted to revascularization with stent. Assessment by Doppler guidewire].

UNLABELLED: Introduction and objectives. Intracoronary Doppler guidewire measurement provides information about the state of the myocardial microcirculation. Our aim was to assess the relationship between the pattern of coronary flow and myocardial viability. Patients and method. The study included 19 patients who had had a recent myocardial infarction (< 1 month), who underwent percutaneous revascularization of the responsible vessel, and who agreed to angiographic follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups according to the extent of the akinetic area observed at follow-up responsible (149 [40] days) in the myocardial region supplied by the responsible artery: one group (n=11) had preserved regional contractility (i.e., an akinetic area less than 30%); the other group (n=8) had impaired regional contractility (i.e., an akinetic area equal to or greater than 30%). Coronary flow in the artery was responsible assessed after revascularization and at follow-up using the Doppler guidewire method. RESULTS: After revascularization, patients with preserved regional contractility had a higher diastolic deceleration half-time than those with impaired regional contractility (628 [188] ms vs 376 [131] ms, P=.02). At follow-up, the difference in coronary flow between the groups had disappeared. Patients in whom regional contractility was preserved demonstrated a significant increase in coronary flow reserve at follow-up (1,8 [0,5] vs 2,3 [0,5], P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: After timely revascularization (within one month) of the vessel responsible for a myocardial infarction, the pattern of coronary flow observed in patients with viable myocardium differed from that in those with non-viable myocardium. The differences disappeared during follow-up.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2004

[ST segment elevation during dipyridamole stress testing in a patient without coronary lesions].

We describe a patient who presented transient ST-segment elevation and typical chest pain during an ischemia test with dipyridamole and technetium-tetrofosmin. Chest pain and electrical alterations disappeared promptly with sublingual nitroglycerin. Coronary angiography showed no epicardial lesions, and coronary vasospasm was suspected. We discuss possible explanations for this complication.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

A randomized comparison of repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty in patients with in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVES: This randomized trial compared repeat stenting with balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: Stent restenosis constitutes a therapeutic challenge. Repeat coronary interventions are currently used in this setting, but the recurrence risk remains high. METHODS: We randomly assigned 450 patients with ISR to elective stent implantation (224 patients) or conventional BA (226 patients). Primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at six months. Secondary end points included minimal lumen diameter (MLD), prespecified subgroup analyses, and a composite of major adverse events. RESULTS: Procedural success was similar in both groups, but in-hospital complications were more frequent in the balloon group. After the procedure MLD was larger in the stent group (2.77 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.25 +/- 0.5 mm, p < 0.001). At follow-up, MLD was larger after stenting when the in-lesion site was considered (1.69 +/- 0.8 vs. 1.54 +/- 0.7 mm, p = 0.046). However, the binary restenosis rate (38% stent group, 39% balloon group) was similar with the two strategies. One-year event-free survival (follow-up 100%) was also similar in both groups (77% stent vs. 71% balloon, p = 0.19). Nevertheless, in the prespecified subgroup of patients with large vessels (> or =3 mm) the restenosis rate (27% vs. 49%, p = 0.007) and the event-free survival (84% vs. 62%, p = 0.002) were better after repeat stenting. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ISR, repeat coronary stenting provided better initial angiographic results but failed to improve restenosis rate and clinical outcome when compared with BA. However, in patients with large vessels coronary stenting improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

[Coronary angiography with 4 f catheters by the radial: minimally invasive catheterization].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Experience with 4 F catheters in cardiac catheterization is limited. These devices appear to be more suitable for the radial artery approach than conventional 6 F catheters. METHODS: We analyze our preliminary experience with diagnostic catheterization of the radial artery with 4 F catheters. Angiographic images were evaluated using a predefined scale (1. poor; 2. acceptable; 3. optimal). In a subgroup of patients who underwent coronary angioplasty, the quantitative angiographic data obtained with the 4 F catheter were compared to those obtained with the 6 F guide catheter. In all cases the patients were clinically followed-up at 24 h and 7 days. RESULTS: Two hundred and six studies performed over a 12-month period were reviewed. In 6 cases (2.9%) the femoral vein had to be used instead and in 4 cases (1.9%) the 4 F catheters were replaced by 6 F catheters. The left coronary angiography was graded as optimal in 83% and as acceptable in 15%. Right coronary artery images were considered optimal in 93% and acceptable in 7%. There was an excellent correlation between the reference diameter obtained by quantitative angiography with the 4 F catheter and values obtained with a 6 F guide catheter (r = 0.92; p < 0.01). No major vascular complications occurred. CONCLUSION: 4 F catheters are appropriate for systematic use in diagnostic procedures using the radial access.

Cardiac Catheterization↗
PubMed2003

[Value of gated-SPECT in defining the post-revascularization prognosis of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy].

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Gated-SPECT simultaneously evaluates perfusion and ventricular function and could provide important prognostic information in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Our aim was to study the value of gated-SPECT performed before revascularization in a cardioischemic population to predict the outcome of revascularization. METHODS: One hundred and ten patients who had undergone percutaneous (n = 100) or surgical revascularization were included. Patients underwent sestamibi gated-SPECT before revascularization. After revascularization, they were followed-up for at least 12 months (mean 23.7 months, maximum 44 months). We recorded deaths and a combined clinical event of death, non-fatal infarction, and hospital re-admission for cardiac reasons. We analyzed the prognostic value of clinical, angiographic, and gated-SPECT variables. RESULTS: During follow-up, there were 14 deaths (6.4%/ year) and 36 cases of combined events (16.5%/year). Multivariate analysis showed that depressed gated-SPECT ejection fraction (threshold 0.30) was the only variable independently related to death (OR = 4.8; 95%CI, 1.6-14.6) and combined event (OR = 2.5; 95%CI, 1.2-4.8). Survival analysis showed that patients with ejection fraction < or = 0.30% had a significantly shorter period of time free of death (33 months [28-38] versus 42 months [40-44]; p = 0.002) and combined events (28 months [23-32] versus 36 months [33-39]; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Gated-SPECT, due to the information it provides about left ventricular function, predicts the prognosis of patients after coronary revascularization.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

[Could fractional flow reserve guide therapeutic strategy in acute coronary syndrome?].

Fractional flow reserve, as determined with a pressure-wire, was validated in the assessment of the functional severity of intermediate lesions in a population with stable ischemic cardiopathy. The value of pressure-wire analysis in acute coronary syndrome is unknown. We report two patients with acute coronary syndrome, in which the therapeutic approach was guided by the fractional flow reserve. We discuss the utility of this tool in this context.

Aged↗