PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Ramy Mahmoud

Publications and source records attributed to Ramy Mahmoud.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A double-blind comparison of risperidone, quetiapine and placebo in patients with schizophrenia experiencing an acute exacerbation requiring hospitalization.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effects of atypical antipsychotics (risperidone or quetiapine) with placebo and with each other in recently exacerbated patients with schizophrenia requiring hospitalization. METHODS: This international, randomized, double-blind study included a 2-week monotherapy phase followed by a 4-week additive therapy phase. Recently exacerbated patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (DSM-IV) were randomized (2:2:1) to risperidone (n = 153), quetiapine (n = 156), or placebo (n = 73). Target doses were 4 or 6 mg/day of risperidone and 400 or 600 mg/day of quetiapine by day 5, with the ability to increase to 600 or 800 mg/day of quetiapine on day 8. The main outcome measures were the total Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and need for additional psychotropic medications. RESULTS: Monotherapy Phase: The combined atypical antipsychotic group (n = 308) reached borderline superiority to placebo (n = 71) at the 2-week endpoint on mean change in total PANSS score (-24.1 +/- 1.2 and -20.2 +/- 2.0, respectively; p = 0.067). The change in the atypical group was driven by the improvement with risperidone (-27.7 +/- 1.5 vs. -20.2 +/- 2.0 with placebo, p < 0.01; and vs. -20.5 +/- 1.5 with quetiapine, p < 0.01); the improvement with quetiapine was similar to placebo, p = 0.879. Results were similar on other efficacy endpoints. Additive Therapy Phase: Additional psychotropics were prescribed to fewer (p < 0.01) risperidone (36%) than quetiapine (53%) or placebo patients (59%). The overall discontinuation rate was 18%, 26%, and 38%, respectively. Risperidone, compared with placebo, was associated with more parkinsonism, akathisia, plasma prolactin changes, and weight gain; while quetiapine was associated with more somnolence, sedation, dizziness, constipation, tachycardia, thyroid dysregulation, and weight gain. CONCLUSION: While the combined atypical antipsychotic group did not experience greater improvements than the placebo group, risperidone, but not quetiapine, was significantly superior in all measured domains to placebo in the management of recently exacerbated hospitalized patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, with no unexpected tolerability findings.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2005

Risperidone treatment in elderly patients with dementia: relative risk of cerebrovascular events versus other antipsychotics.

BACKGROUND: The possibility that low-dose antipsychotic treatment is associated with increased risk of cerebrovascular events (CVEs) in elderly patients with dementia has been raised. The objective was to determine whether risperidone is associated with an increased risk of CVEs relative to other commonly considered alternative treatments. METHODS: An analysis of Medicaid data from 1999 to 2002, representing approximately 8 million enrollees from multiple states, was conducted. The primary outcome was the incidence of acute inpatient admission for a CVE within 3 months following initiation of treatment with atypical antipsychotics (risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or ziprasidone), haloperidol, or benzo-diazepines. RESULTS: Descriptive analyses found similar rates of incident CVEs across evaluated agents. Multivariate analyses found no differences in comparisons of risperidone with olanzapine or quetiapine. Risperidone and other antipsychotics as a group were also not associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) of incident CVE than either haloperidol or benzodiazepines. With risperidone as the reference group: olanzapine, OR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.63-1.73; quetiapine, OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.23-1.87; haloperidol, OR = 1.91, 95% CI 1.02-3.60; benzodiazepines, OR = 1.97, 95% CI 1.30-2.98. With benzodiazepines as the reference group, the OR of incident CVE for all antipsychotics as a class was 0.49, 95%CI 0.35-0.69. CONCLUSIONS: This study found no significant difference in the incidence of CVEs between patients taking risperidone and those taking other atypical antipsychotics. Risperidone and all atypical antipsychotics were not associated with higher risk than two common treatment alternatives (haloperidol and benzodiazepines). These findings do not support the conclusion that risperidone is associated with a higher risk of CVE than other available treatment alternatives. The data also suggest that patient characteristics other than antipsychotic use are more significant predictors of CVEs. Given the relatively low rates of incident CVEs, a larger sample of patients with groups closely balanced on a wide spectrum of potential risk factors could provide a more precise assessment of risk.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Effects of behavioral therapy on weight loss in overweight and obese patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is common in persons with schizophrenia. Besides its adverse health effects, obesity reduces quality of life and contributes to the social stigma of schizophrenia. METHOD: This 14-week, multicenter, open-label, rater-blinded, randomized study evaluated the effects of a group-based behavioral treatment (BT) for weight loss in overweight and obese stable patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had been switched from olanzapine to risperidone. Participants were randomly assigned to receive BT or usual clinical care (UC). BT included 20 sessions during which patients were taught to reduce caloric intake. In UC, patients were encouraged to lose weight but received no special advice about weight reduction. The primary outcome measure was change in body weight. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled. The mean +/- SD weight loss at endpoint was significant in both groups (p < .05) and numerically greater in patients receiving BT than in those receiving UC (-2.0 +/- 3.79 and -1.1 +/- 3.11 kg, respectively). More patients in the BT group than in the UC group had lost > or = 5% of their body weight at endpoint (26.5% [9/34] and 10.8% [4/37], respectively; p = .082). A post hoc analysis of patients attending at least 1 BT session showed that significantly more patients in the BT than the UC group had lost > or = 5% of their body weight at endpoint (32.1% [9/28] vs. 10.8% [4/37], respectively, p = .038) and at week 14 (complete population; 40.9% [9/22] and 14.3% [4/28], respectively, p = .027). CONCLUSION: BT may be an effective method for weight reduction in patients with chronic psychotic illness.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

The heterogeneity of schizophrenia in disease states.

PREVIOUS PRESENTATION: Some of the contents of this paper have been previously presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Technology Assessment in Health Care June 20, 2000 in the Hague, Netherlands and at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making as a poster on October 3, 1999 in Reno, NV. BACKGROUND: Studies of schizophrenia treatment often oversimplify the array of health outcomes among patients. Our objective was to derive a set of disease states for schizophrenia using the Positive and Negative Symptom Assessment Scale (PANSS) that captured the heterogeneity of symptom responses. METHODS: Using data from a 1-year clinical trial that collected PANSS scores and costs on schizophrenic patients (N=663), we conducted a k-means cluster analyses on PANSS scores for items in five factor domains. Results of the cluster analysis were compared with a conceptual framework of disease states developed by an expert panel. Final disease states were defined by combining our conceptual framework with the empirical results. We tested its utility by examining the influence of disease state on treatment costs and prognosis. RESULTS: Analyses led to an eight-state framework with varying levels of positive, negative, and cognitive impairment. The extent of hostile/aggressive symptoms and mood disorders correlated with severity of disease states. Direct treatment costs for schizophrenia vary significantly across disease states (F=27.47, df=7, p<0.0001), and disease state at baseline was among the most important predictors of treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION: The disease states we describe offer a useful paradigm for understanding the links between symptom profiles and outcomes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Differential effects of antipsychotic agents on the risk of development of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with mood disorders.

BACKGROUND: Atypical antipsychotics are being used increasingly in the management of mood disorders. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the association between exposure to antipsychotic therapy and newly reported type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with mood disorders. METHODS: Claims data for the period January 1996 through December 1997 were analyzed for patients with mood disorders in 2 large US health plans. Logistic regression models were used to determine the odds of reporting diabetes in patients exposed to risperidone, olanzapine, or high- or low-potency conventional antipsychotics compared with untreated patients, taking into account duration of treatment and dosage. Some of the covariates used in the models were concurrent use of antipsychotics, use of other psychotropic drugs, age, sex, and length of observation. RESULTS: Based on the claims data, 849 patients were exposed to risperidone, 656 to olanzapine, 785 to high-potency conventional antipsychotics, and 302 to low-potency conventional antipsychotics; 2644 patients were untreated. The odds of newly reported type 2 diabetes in patients who received risperidone were not significantly different from those in untreated patients (12-month odds ratio [OR] = 1.024; 95% CI, 0.351-3.015). The odds in patients treated with high-potency conventional antipsychotics also did not differ significantly from those of untreated patients (12-month OR = 1.945; 95% CI, 0.794-4.786). Unlike patients who received risperidone or high-potency conventional antipsychotics, patients who received olanzapine (12-month OR = 4.289; 95% CI, 2.102-8.827) and low-potency conventional antipsychotics (12-month OR = 4.972; 95% CI, 1.967-12.612) had significantly higher odds for the development of type 2 diabetes compared with untreated patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that some antipsychotics may increase the risk for the development of type 2 diabetes in patients with mood disorders and that the effect may vary by drug. In contrast to olanzapine and low-potency conventional antipsychotics, risperidone and high-potency conventional antipsychotics were not associated with an increased risk for development of type 2 diabetes in this patient population.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of risperidone and haloperidol for the prevention of relapse in patients with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of relapse is a major goal of maintenance treatment in patients with psychotic disorders. We performed a long-term comparison of a newer, atypical antipsychotic drug, risperidone, and an older, conventional neuroleptic drug, haloperidol, in terms of the rate of relapse in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. METHODS: In a double-blind, prospective study at 40 sites, we randomly assigned adult outpatients in stable condition with chronic schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder to receive treatment with flexible doses of either risperidone or haloperidol for a minimum of one year. RESULTS: Of the 397 patients who underwent randomization, data from 2 were excluded because they did not receive study medication; data from all 30 patients from one site were excluded by the sponsor, the Janssen Research Foundation, because of concern about the integrity of the data. The median duration of treatment was 364 days in the risperidone group and 238 days in the haloperidol group (P=0.02). Of the 177 patients assigned to risperidone and the 188 assigned to haloperidol who remained in the analysis, 44.1 percent and 52.7 percent, respectively, discontinued treatment for reasons other than relapse. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of the risk of relapse at the end of the study was 34 percent for the risperidone group and 60 percent for the haloperidol group (P<0.001); the risk ratio for relapse with haloperidol, from the Cox model, was 1.93 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.33 to 2.80; P<0.001). Early discontinuation of treatment for any reason was more frequent among haloperidol-treated patients (risk ratio, 1.52; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.18 to 1.96). Patients in the risperidone group had greater reductions in the mean severity of both psychotic symptoms and extrapyramidal side effects than those in the haloperidol group. CONCLUSIONS: Adult outpatients with clinically stable schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder have a lower risk of relapse if they are treated with risperidone than if they are treated with haloperidol.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Use of healthcare services by patients treated with risperidone versus conventional antipsychotic agents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the use of risperidone in a US managed-care environment is associated with a reduction in the use of mental healthcare services. METHODS: Mental health service use and costs for patients with psychoses treated with risperidone versus those treated with conventional antipsychotic agents were compared by both between-group and within-group comparisons. The study controlled for differences between the groups. Only direct medical costs were considered. All costs were for the years 1994 to 1996. PERSPECTIVE: US managed care plan. RESULTS: Costs (excluding antipsychotic drug costs) per member per month (PMPM) were 180 US dollars lower with risperidone (p < 0.05); per member per year (PMPY) costs were 2160 US dollars lower. In patients who received both risperidone and conventional treatments, PMPM costs were 212 US dollars (2544 US dollars PMPY) lower during risperidone treatment. Total costs (including antipsychotic drug costs) were 624 US dollars PMPY lower with risperidone by between-group comparisons and 1008 US dollars PMPY lower by within-group comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that higher risperidone acquisition costs are offset by reductions in other mental healthcare costs, particularly inpatient hospitalisation costs. This indicates that risperidone may be a more economical choice than traditional antipsychotics for the treatment of psychoses.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Methods for claims-based pharmacoeconomic studies in psychosis.

Pharmacoeconomic studies using claims data are frequently employed to compare the healthcare costs associated with competing drugs. Different methodological approaches with varying limitations for evaluating claims data are reviewed within the context of psychosis. Intent-to-treat paradigms and mirror-image designs have limitations that can bias comparisons of health resource use and can be addressed through the use of drug treatment episodes. Health resource use is better measured in financial rather than volume amounts, to account for service intensity. However, financial measures reported in claims records need to be carefully chosen. Between-group comparisons are frequently affected by selection bias, and within-group comparisons are often limited by period bias. While selection bias can be addressed by controlling for patient factors such as disease severity, and period bias by controlling for trend, devising appropriate control measures from the limited information in claims data can be challenging. Healthcare data are often skewed, which affects statistical testing. While skewed data are commonly handled through log transformation, this method has serious limitations, potentially distorting pharmacoeconomic comparisons. Determining the most appropriate methods for claims-based data involves careful evaluation of the alternate approaches to best achieve the goals of a pharmacoeconomic investigation.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Regulatory issues for health-related quality of life--PhRMA Health Outcomes Committee workshop, 1999.

INTRODUCTION: Health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) can be defined as the impact of disease and treatment across the physical, psychological, social and somatic domains of functioning and well-being. Health-related quality-of-life measures are included in clinical trials of drug treatment to assess the impact of therapy on the patient's functioning. HRQL guidance could allow for use of this data in drug labeling and promotion. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to provide recommendations with respect to regulatory issues important to the development of guidelines for HRQL research. METHODS: The HRQL workshop was planned jointly by members of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Health Outcomes Committee and the Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications of the Food and Drug Administration. The workshop was limited to six regulatory issues related to HRQL research in clinical trials of pharmaceutical therapies. These six issues were: instrument selection and validation, study design, data analysis, HRQL and safety, clinical meaning, and promotional use. Before the meeting, a consensus was reached that HRQL does not measure, nor should it be used to measure, safety. Therefore, five work groups discussed HRQL issues and made recommendations. RESULTS: Overall, the workshop recommended that HRQL measures be treated as any other clinical end point. The workshop recognized that research in HRQL methods is ongoing and that any guidance should be flexible to allow for changes in this developing research area. CONCLUSIONS: HRQL provides a patient perspective on the impact of disease and therapy on patients' daily life and functioning. Including HRQL information in promotion could be beneficial to decision making on the use of therapies. HRQL is a measure of effectiveness, not safety, and should be treated as any other clinical end point.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗