PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Randall E Millikan

Publications and source records attributed to Randall E Millikan.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Prostate cancer progression in the presence of undetectable or low serum prostate-specific antigen level.

BACKGROUND: The serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after definitive treatment for prostate cancer (PC) is a powerful predictor of outcome. Occasionally, PC progression can occur despite low or undetectable PSA levels. The authors report on the clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients who experienced PC progression with undetectable or low PSA levels. METHODS: From an electronic database of all patients with PC who were treated at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1999 and 2004, a group of 46 patients was identified who had progression to metastatic PC detected with concomitant PSA levels from 0.1 ng/mL to 2 ng/mL. Patient charts were reviewed for tumor stage, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA level, and the presence of atypical histologic variants (ie, ductal, sarcomatoid, or small cell cancers). The nadir PSA level after treatment and the PSA level at the time metastatic PC was detected were determined. The patients were followed semiannually, and imaging studies were obtained at the discretion of treating physicians. The sites of metastasis and histologic confirmation were reported when available. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 46 patients underwent radical prostatectomy, 11 patients received radiation therapy, and 12 received hormone treatment as their initial form of therapy. Progression to metastatic disease with concomitant, undetectable PSA levels occurred in 10 patients, including 3 patients who had not received treatment with hormones. The sites of metastasis included bone (n = 35 patients), liver (n = 7 patients), retroperitoneal lymph nodes (n = 5 patients), lungs (n = 4 patients), and brain (n = 1 patient). Aggressive and locally advanced PC were common features in these patients: Eighty-five percent had Gleason scores >or=7, 63% had clinical T3 or T4 tumors, and 41% had pretreatment PSA levels >10 ng/mL. Atypical histologic variants were observed in 21 patients (46%) and in 8 of 10 patients who progressed with undetectable PSA levels. In 10 patients (22%), metastasis were detected in the presence of an undetectable PSA level. Eight of those patients had small cell carcinoma. In 19 patients (41%), progression to metastasis occurred without any increase in their PSA from the nadir level. Thirty-one patients (67%) were asymptomatic at the time metastasis was detected, and the detection of metastasis in these patients occurred only because of routine imaging studies. CONCLUSIONS: Progression of PC may occur despite undetectable or low PSA levels. Complete physical evaluation and imaging studies may be indicated in the surveillance of patients with high-grade, locally advanced tumors, especially when atypical histologic variants are present.

Aged↗

The case for early cystectomy in the treatment of nonmuscle invasive micropapillary bladder carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Micropapillary bladder carcinoma is a rare variant of UC. Due to paucity of data regarding treatment outcomes, patients with nonmuscle invasive micropapillary UC often receive intravesical therapy in an attempt at bladder preservation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of all patients evaluated at our institution who had micropapillary UC of the bladder. Of these, 44 had nonmuscle invasive disease at presentation and form the basis of this report. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 64.3 years (range 45 to 81) with a male-to-female ratio of 13:1. Stage distribution at presentation was 5 Ta (11%), 4 CIS (9%) and 35 T1 (80%). Median CSS was 81 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5 and 10-year CSS rates were 64% and 26%, respectively. Intravesical BCG therapy was attempted in 27 patients (61%). Of these 27 patients, 67% (18 of 27) had progression (cT2 or greater), including 22% in whom metastatic disease developed. Only 19% of patients (5 of 27, all T1) remain disease-free with an intact bladder at a median followup of 30 months. A total of 30 patients (68%) underwent cystectomy. Among patients who underwent cystectomy after progression (18), median CSS was 61.7 months with no patient surviving 10 years, whereas among those undergoing cystectomy as initial therapy (12), median survival was not reached and the 10-year CSS rate was 72%. CONCLUSIONS: Intravesical BCG therapy appears to be ineffective against micropapillary UC. Our results suggest that the optimal treatment strategy for nonmuscle invasive micropapillary UC is radical cystectomy performed before progression.

Aged↗

Phase I trial of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib in patients with advanced solid tumors with observations in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicity and maximum-tolerated dose of the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib administered intravenously weekly for 4 every 5 weeks; to determine the bortezomib pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics using plasma levels and an assay for 20S proteasome inhibition (PI) in whole blood; to correlate toxicity with bortezomib dose and degree of 20S PI; and to conduct a preliminary determination of the antitumor activity of bortezomib in patients with androgen independent prostate cancer (AIPCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three patients (48 with AIPCa) received 128 cycles of bortezomib in doses ranging from 0.13 to 2.0 mg/m(2)/dose, utilizing a careful escalation scheme with a continuous reassessment method. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies were performed in 24 patients (at 1.45 to 2.0 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: A dose-related 20S PI was seen, with dose-limiting toxicity at 2.0 mg/m(2) (diarrhea, hypotension) occurring at an average 1-hour post-dose of >/= 75% 20S PI. Other side effects were fatigue, hypertension, constipation, nausea, and vomiting. No relationship was seen between body-surface area and bortezomib clearance over the narrow dose range tested. There was evidence of biologic activity (decline in serum prostate-specific antigen and interleukin-6 levels) at >/= 50% 20S PI. Two patients with AIPCa had prostate-specific antigen response and two patients had partial response in lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: The maximum-tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose of bortezomib in this schedule is 1.6 mg/m(2). Biologic activity (inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B-related markers) and antitumor activity is seen in AIPCa at tolerated doses of bortezomib. This agent should be further explored with chemotherapy agents in advanced prostate cancer.

Adult↗

Is there a role for surgery in the management of metastatic urothelial cancer? The M. D. Anderson experience.

PURPOSE: Although rarely curative, chemotherapy remains the mainstay of treatment for metastatic urothelial cancer. The role of surgery for metastatic disease is not well established for urothelial cancer, but is sometimes undertaken in the face of persistent or recurrent disease that can be surgically resected. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 31 patients with metastatic urothelial cancer undergoing metastasectomy with the intent of rendering them free of disease. All gross disease was completely resected in 30 patients (97%). The most frequently resected location was lung in 24 cases (77%), followed by distant lymph nodes in 4 (13%), brain in 2 (7%) and a subcutaneous metastasis in 1 (3%). RESULTS: Median survival from diagnosis of metastases and from time of metastasectomy was 31 and 23 months, respectively. The 5-year survival from metastasectomy was 33%. Median time to progression following metastasectomy was 7 months. Five patients were alive and free of disease for more than 3 years after metastasectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The results in this highly selected cohort, with 33% alive at 5 years after metastasectomy, suggest that resection of metastatic disease is feasible and may contribute to long-term disease control especially when integrated with chemotherapy. Further prospective studies should be undertaken to better characterize the selection criteria and benefit from this intervention.

Adult↗

Evidence supporting preoperative chemotherapy for small cell carcinoma of the bladder: a retrospective review of the M. D. Anderson cancer experience.

PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine tumors of the bladder comprise a small subset of all bladder tumors. To improve our understanding of this tumor and define outcomes with current management, we performed a retrospective review of these cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 88 patients with small cell bladder carcinoma evaluated at our institution between 1985 and 2002. Of these patients 46 underwent cystectomy, including 25 who were treated with initial cystectomy and 21 who received preoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: For patients treated with initial cystectomy median cancer specific survival (CSS) was 23 months, with 36% disease-free at 5 years. For patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy median CSS has not been reached (p = 0.026), although CSS at 5-years was 78% with no cancer related deaths observed beyond 2 years. Notably 7 of 25 patients treated with initial cystectomy received chemotherapy after surgery but their survival was no better than those treated with cystectomy alone. As others have observed, the pathological stage was higher than clinically appreciated for 56% of patients treated with initial cystectomy. Moreover, there were no cancer related deaths among patients with disease down staged to pT2 or less. CONCLUSIONS: Like other neuroendocrine tumors, small cell carcinoma of the bladder grows rapidly but is chemo-sensitive. Clinical under staging is the rule. Optimal results are achieved via integration of local and systemic treatment. Our results suggest that preoperative chemotherapy is the optimal strategy, even in the setting of clinically localized cancer. On the basis of these observations, we have initiated a trial in which 4 cycles of aggressive multiagent preoperative chemotherapy are followed by radical cystectomy.

Adult↗

A Phase I/II study of strontium-89 combined with gemcitabine in the treatment of patients with androgen independent prostate carcinoma and bone metastases.

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the current study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose and to evaluate the efficacy of gemcitabine given in combination with strontium-89 to patients with androgen independent prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with androgen-independent prostate carcinoma and painful osteoblastic bone metastases were eligible. On a 12-week course, patients received gemcitabine (600 mg/m(2) or 800 mg/m(2)) on Days 1, 8, 15, 43, 50, and 57. A single dose of strontium-89 (55 microCi/kg) was administered on Day 8. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were registered, and all were assessable for response and toxicity. Four patients were treated at Dose Level 1 (gemcitabine 600 mg/m(2)) without dose-limiting toxicity. Eleven patients received a total of 13 courses at Dose Level 2 (gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2)). Platelet nadirs of 25000-50000 platelets per microL were common at Dose Level 2, and 1 patient had Grade 4 thrombocytopenia that was dose-limiting. Granulocyte nadirs up to < 500 granulocytes per microL occurred in 4 patients at Dose Level 2 and were reversible. There were no responses, as measured by prostate specific antigen concentration, although 6 patients (40%) had stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that 800 mg/m(2) gemcitabine was the maximum tolerated dose for the combination. The study was terminated on the basis that an overall response rate > than 10% was unlikely. Further study at this dose level and schedule is not warranted. .

Aged↗

Multimodality management of urachal carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

PURPOSE: Enteric type adenocarcinomas arising in the dome of the bladder or along the urachal ligament are uncommon. To improve our understanding of urachal carcinoma and define outcome with current management, we performed a retrospective review of cases seen at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 42 patients with urachal carcinoma evaluated at our institution from 1985 to 2001. Specifically, we sought to evaluate the importance of extent of disease, surgical characteristics and systemic therapy on clinical outcome. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients 7 had clinically evident metastases at diagnosis and 35 had resectable disease that was managed initially with surgery. Overall survival from diagnosis for all 42 patients was 46 months with 40% surviving at 5 years. Of the resected cases 16 (46%) remain disease-free (median followup 31 months). Covariates associated with long-term survival were negative surgical margins (p = 0.004) and absence of nodal involvement (p = 0.01). Median survival from recognition of metastatic disease was 24 months in 26 patients in whom metastases ultimately developed. Chemotherapy for metastatic disease produced only 4 significant responses, including 3 of 9 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin containing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Urachal carcinomas are usually locally advanced at presentation with a high risk of distant metastases. However, long-term survival following radical resection occurs in a significant fraction of patients (16 of 35 in our series), supporting an attempt at margin-negative, en bloc resection if at all possible. Chemotherapy appropriate for enteric type adenocarcinoma can induce objective responses but meaningful improvement in survival is not yet demonstrated.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Dose-finding with two agents in Phase I oncology trials.

We propose an adaptive two-stage Bayesian design for finding one or more acceptable dose combinations of two cytotoxic agents used together in a Phase I clinical trial. The method requires that each of the two agents has been studied previously as a single agent, which is almost invariably the case in practice. A parametric model is assumed for the probability of toxicity as a function of the two doses. Informative priors for parameters characterizing the single-agent toxicity probability curves are either elicited from the physician(s) planning the trial or obtained from historical data, and vague priors are assumed for parameters characterizing two-agent interactions. A method for eliciting the single-agent parameter priors is described. The design is applied to a trial of gemcitabine and cyclophosphamide, and a simulation study is presented.

Algorithms↗

Cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide as weekly therapy: a feasibility and phase II study of salvage treatment for advanced transitional-cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We investigated the feasibility, safety, and antitumor activity of weekly gemcitabine given in combination with low doses of cisplatin and ifosfamide in previously treated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelium. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, metastatic or unresectable TCC who had received one or two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. On a 28-day course, doses of cisplatin 30 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2), and ifosfamide 1 g/m(2) were given on day 1 and then repeated on day 8 and day 15 unless there was dose-limiting hematologic toxicity. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were registered; 10 patients participated in a pilot study, after which 41 patients were registered onto the phase II protocol. Forty-eight patients (94.1%) had dose-limiting hematologic toxicity on day 8 or day 15. Nonhematologic toxicity of grade 3 or greater consisted mainly of nausea and vomiting (seven patients, 13.7%) and infection (seven patients, 13.7%). Responses could be assessed in 49 of 51 eligible patients; two complete responses (4.1%) and 18 partial responses (36.7%) were observed for an overall response rate of 40.8% (exact 95% confidence interval, 27% to 56%). CONCLUSION: This regimen of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and ifosfamide is not feasible for weekly administration because of hematologic toxicity. Nevertheless, there was promising activity with only two doses per 28-day cycle. On the basis of these results, we have initiated a phase II trial of this combination given as a single dose every 14 days in patients with untreated, metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Adult↗

Phase III trial of fluorouracil, interferon alpha-2b, and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in metastatic or unresectable urothelial cancer.

PURPOSE: Previously, we developed a novel biochemotherapy regimen combining interferon alpha-2b with fluorouracil and cisplatin (FAP). We now report the results of a prospective randomized trial comparing FAP with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC), the standard chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced and metastatic urothelial cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the response rates and overall survival of patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial cancer treated with these two chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between October 1992 and September 1999, 172 previously untreated patients were registered and randomly assigned to treatment with either FAP or M-VAC. Patients were followed until their death. RESULTS: The pretreatment clinical characteristics of the groups were similar except for sex (P <.01). Sex did not affect prognosis or survival. The objective response rate for patients assigned to FAP was 42% (35 of 83 patients), with complete response observed in eight (10%) of 83 patients. Among the patients assigned to M-VAC, 51 (59%) of 86 had an objective response, with complete response observed in 21 (24%) of 86. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of median survival was 12.5 months for both groups. Both regimens were quite toxic, with more mucocutaneous toxicity in the FAP arm and more myelosuppression in the M-VAC arm. CONCLUSION: Although overall survival was not significantly different, patients assigned to M-VAC had a much better chance of responding to front-line therapy. Thus, FAP is very likely to be inferior to M-VAC and is certainly no less toxic. FAP cannot be recommended as part of the standard armamentarium for urothelial cancer.

Adult↗

Treating refractory advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma with interleukin-2: a phase II study.

Patients with refractory advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma derive only minor benefit from chemotherapy. Based on evidence that urothelial carcinoma may be associated with impaired immunological reactivity, we conducted a phase II trial of interleukin-2 (IL-2), a biologic response modifier, to assess its efficacy and toxicity in treating refractory advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Seventeen patients with urothelial carcinoma who had undergone no more than 1 cisplatin-containing chemotherapy regimen were treated with IL-2 at a dose of 3 x 10(6) IU/m(2)/day by continuous intravenous infusion for 4 consecutive days each week for 4 weeks. Cycles were to be repeated every 6 weeks until disease progression. Toxic effects could be assessed in all 17 patients and response in 13. The most common grade III and IV toxic effects included hypotension (13/17); anemia (6/17); thrombocytopenia (4/17); granulocytopenia (3/17); and, in 1 patient each, cardiac ischemia, bowel perforation, and an increase in creatinine level. One sudden death was assumed to be treatment related. Although we found no objective antitumor activity for IL-2, median patient survival was 10.5 months (95% confidence interval, 5.8 to 17.1 months), with a 15.9-month median survival for 3 patients with poor performance status and visceral metastases. Further clinical investigation of the biological effect of IL-2 in urothelial carcinoma may be warranted.

Adult↗

Treatment of refractory urothelial carcinoma with alternating paclitaxel, methotrexate, cisplatin (TMP) and 5-fluorouracil, alpha-interferon, cisplatin (FAP).

We assessed the activity and safety of a biochemotherapy regimen in which courses of paclitaxel, methotrexate, and cisplatin were alternated with courses of 5-fluorouracil, alpha-interferon, and cisplatin in the treatment of refractory urothelial carcinoma. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. In the phase I portion, 15 patients were treated according to an escalating dosage regimen designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose. A total of 30 patients received treatment according to the maximum tolerated dose regimen: methotrexate (30 mg/m(2)) given iv on days 1 and 22; paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) given iv over 3 h on day 1; cisplatin (70 and 25 mg/m(2)) administered iv on days 1 and 22, respectively; 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m(2)) given iv by continuous infusion daily for 5 days beginning on day 22; and alpha-interferon (4 mIU/m(2)) given SC daily for 5 days simultaneously with the 5-fluorouracil infusions. The regimen was repeated at 42-day intervals. The 40 treated patients had an overall response rate of 43%, a complete response rate of 18%, and a median survival time of 44 weeks. Most of the toxic effects were hematologic: Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 30% of patients (12 patients) and Grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 20% (8 patients). Even though this alternating biochemotherapy regimen was active for patients with refractory urothelial carcinoma, its activity was not better than that of certain single cytotoxic agents. Furthermore, the complicated dosing schedule and toxic effects of the regimen precluded its routine use in the treatment of urothelial carcinoma.

Aged↗