PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Randall Odem

Publications and source records attributed to Randall Odem.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Programming ovulation using estrogens for patients to time intercourse.

BACKGROUND: A woman wishing to conceive may be separated from her spouse at the time of ovulation. Moreover, some orthodox Jewish women have a unique problem when they are unable to initiate intercourse before ovulation. They are prohibited from participating in sexual relations from the start of menstruation until 7 days after the end of flow when they go to the ritual bath (mikveh). CASES: Two orthodox Jewish women who ovulated before restarting intercourse were treated with oral estrogens to delay ovulation. CONCLUSION: Women separated from their husbands at the time of ovulation and Jewish women who ovulate before ritual cleansing can effectively use oral estrogens to program ovulation.

Administration, Oral↗

Pregnancy outcome in recurrent miscarriage patients with skewed X chromosome inactivation.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze X inactivation in women with recurrent miscarriage to estimate whether skewed X inactivation is associated with recurrent miscarriage and whether it predicts next pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: A multicenter study was performed. A power calculation determined that 101 patients were needed to detect a difference in skewed X inactivation between patients and controls. Patients were entered into a prospective trial of mononuclear-cell immunotherapy and subsequently tested for skewed X inactivation. Age-matched controls had one live birth and no prior miscarriages. Results from our X inactivation assay were compared with those from an independent genetics laboratory. RESULTS: Greater than 75% skewing was seen in 22.6% of patients and 26.5% controls (P =.52). Greater than 90% skewing was seen in 6.6% of patients and 3.9% of controls (P =.77). There were 19.8% of primary aborters and 32% of secondary aborters with greater than 75% skewed X inactivation (P =.38). There were 4.9% of primary aborters and 12.0% of secondary aborters with greater than 90% skewed X inactivation (P =.27) Neither greater than 75% nor greater than 90% skewed X inactivation impacted next pregnancy outcomes (odds ratios = 0.87 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34, 2.3] and 1.4 [95% CI 0.27, 7.5], respectively). Results of the exchange of samples with an independent laboratory were highly correlated (alpha = 0.987, P <.001, coefficient of variation = 5.5%). CONCLUSION: Skewed X chromosome inactivation is not associated with recurrent miscarriage. A patient's X chromosome inactivation status does not predict next pregnancy outcome. Our assay correlates with another experienced laboratory.

Abortion, Habitual↗