PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rashad Massoud

Publications and source records attributed to Rashad Massoud.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

The evaluation of quality assurance: developing and testing practical methods for managers.

OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY: To develop an approach for evaluating quality assurance (QA) activities and programs in health care settings and to test different evaluation methods. DESIGN: This was not a formal scientific study, but rather a research and development (R&D) study, which followed the following steps: (1) reviewing the literature; (2) clarifying critical issues for all key aspects of QA activities; (3) drafting a guide to provide a flexible vehicle for different approaches; (4) testing and adapting the guide as it evolved in three countries; and (5) testing two evaluation tools (self-assessment and appreciative evaluation) in Chile. SETTING AND STUDY PARTICIPANTS: The evaluation guide was tested by evaluating QA structures, activities, and programs at the country, regional, and facility levels in Zambia, Niger, and Chile. RESULTS: The study resulted in an evaluation guide, which includes an implementation outline, an evaluation matrix, and an appendix of evaluation tools and methods. The guide helps evaluators: agree on a proposed evaluation's scope and design; develop an evaluation methods plan; and address QA history, advocacy, culture, and structure, as well as QA activities and accomplishments. Specific results of the country evaluations in Zambia, Niger, and Chile are presented in separate articles in this supplement. CONCLUSION: The QA programs in which the evaluation guide was tested differed in many ways, such as health system structure, decision to focus on particular services, political level implementing QA, policy environment, leadership, and program evolution. The implementation guide presents an outline of the key implementation steps for an evaluation, and includes checklists and model forms (e.g. sample agenda for a team planning meeting, sample list of questions to focus the evaluation). The evaluation matrix presents indicators by QA component and key question, and it enables evaluators to build an approach and select methods. The appendix describes the various tools and methods presented in the first two sections of the evaluation guide.

Chile↗

The Chilean legacies in health care quality.

OBJECTIVE: The Chilean quality assurance (QA) program evaluation took place in July 1999, at the request of the Chilean Ministry of Health. The main objectives of the evaluation were to identify key aspects of the 8-year-old Chilean QA program that could be considered by other countries and to make strategic recommendations. SETTING: In 1991, the Ministry of Health of Chile launched a national QA program. A national-level team initiated countrywide training of health care providers in QA skills, the development of quality committees at facility levels to direct local quality improvement activities, and training of quality monitors to provide technical support for training and quality improvement activities. DESIGN: The evaluation team, consisting of two international consultants and a regional consultant from the Costa Rican Ministry of Health, visited six regions and seven health 'servicios' (geographically defined administrative units within a region). The regions and servicios were purposefully chosen to represent different geographic areas, types of facilities, and levels of performance of QA activities. The evaluation was based on a framework developed and applied by the Quality Assurance Project (Center for Human Services, USA). Group and individual interviews with staff complemented document and record reviews. RESULTS: The evaluation team found that Chile's QA program had been successful in achieving sustainability and institutionalization. Factors contributing to this success included the enabling environment, management and leadership, technical functions, and support functions. CONCLUSION: The Chilean QA program constitutes an interesting experience for consideration by other countries. Key features include its sustainability, nationwide coverage, decentralization, and alliance of quality improvement and regulation. Training results are impressive: almost 20% of Ministry of Health personnel received training, and 19 training modules are in use. Coaches are active and technically sustaining quality assurance activities nationwide.

Chile↗