PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Raymond Y C Yiu

Publications and source records attributed to Raymond Y C Yiu.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Critical appraisal on the role and outcome of emergency colectomy for uncomplicated right-sided colonic diverticulitis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency colectomy is well accepted for treating complicated right-sided colonic diverticulitis. However, the role of colectomy for uncomplicated diverticulitis is not well defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term and long-term surgical outcome of uncomplicated right-sided diverticulitis in our locality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients operated for right-sided diverticulitis over a 20-year period was conducted. Recurrent attacks of right-sided diverticulitis, re-operation rate and re-hospitalisation rate were the long-term parameters of interest. An updated telephone interview was carried out for all surviving patients. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients (35 males and 39 females), median age 35.5 (range 16-70) years, were operated for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Thirty patients underwent colectomy, whereas the others underwent appendectomy with diverticulectomy (n = 8) or appendectomy alone (n = 36). All short-term parameters were less favourable for the colectomy group, including higher complication rate, slower return of gastrointestinal function, higher requirement of parenteral analgesic and longer hospital stay. Without colectomy, only 2 patients developed recurrent diverticulitis necessitating hospitalisation, both of whom resolved on conservative treatment. On the other hand, 1 patient required re-operation after colectomy because of intestinal obstruction. The overall re-hospitalisation rate was comparable between the colectomy and the non-colectomy group (16.7% vs. 13.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Emergency colectomy can eradicate suspicious lesions and eliminate risk of recurrent diverticulitis but at the expense of higher morbidity rates. As the natural course of uncomplicated right-sided colonic diverticulitis is usually benign, conservative treatment with minimal surgery may be a better therapeutic option.

Adolescent↗

Endolaparoscopic left hemicolectomy and synchronous laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for obstructive carcinoma of the descending colon and renal cell carcinoma.

Colorectal self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) have been used successfully as preoperative bridges to surgery for obstructive left-sided colorectal carcinoma. Endoscopic relief of the obstruction allows for full bowel preparation and accurate preoperative staging. A laparoscopic approach, considered by many to be contraindicated in the presence of obstruction, becomes feasible after endoscopic decompression. We present a case of obstructive carcinoma of the descending colon successfully treated with endoscopic decompression with colorectal SEMS. Subsequent staging with computed tomography revealed a renal cell carcinoma in the left kidney. Synchronous laparoscopic resection of the two carcinomas was performed, with no morbidity. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of endolaparoscopic left hemicolectomy and synchronous laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for obstructive carcinoma of the descending colon and renal cell carcinoma. The advantages of colorectal SEMS and the endolaparoscopic approach in managing obstructive colorectal carcinoma are discussed.

Aged, 80 and over↗

Emergency laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colon carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We report our preliminary experience in urgent laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colon carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January to April 2005, seven consecutive patients with obstructing right-sided colon carcinoma underwent emergency laparoscopically assisted right or extended right hemicolectomy. Patient demographic data, operative details, and short-term clinical outcomes were prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The median duration of obstructing symptoms prior to admission was 3 days (range, 1-6 days). Two patients underwent palliative resection and five patients underwent curative resection. The median operative time was 180 minutes (range, 125-350 minutes). There were no conversions to the open procedure. Median blood loss was 30 mL (range, negligible-300 mL). The median times to resuming diet, first bowel motion, and full ambulation were 4 days (range, 3-10 days), 5 days (range, 3-7 days), and 4 days (range, 4-5 days), respectively. The median duration of hospital stay was 7 days (range, 6-19 days). One patient with ischemic heart disease developed acute coronary syndrome postoperatively and died on postoperative day 19. The remaining patients had no complications. The median tumor length was 3.5 cm (range, 2-5 cm) and the median number of lymph nodes removed was 17 (range, 16-36). CONCLUSION: Emergency laparoscopically assisted right hemicolectomy for obstructing right-sided colon carcinoma is feasible and safe, with favorable short-term clinical outcomes and an acceptable number of lymph nodes removed.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Simultaneous laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer and liver metastasis.

Simultaneous resection of colorectal tumor and liver metastasis has been advocated because of the benefits of avoiding a second operation, reduced morbidity, shorter treatment time, and similar outcomes. We report a case of simultaneous laparoscopic resection. The operative time was 350 minutes and the estimated blood loss was 500 mL. The patient required parenteral analgesia for less than 48 hours. Flatus was passed on postoperative day 3, and a solid diet was resumed on postoperative day 5. He was fully mobile on postoperative day 4 and was discharged 3 days later. With the advance of laparoscopic technology and technique, simultaneous resection becomes an attractive option.

Colorectal Neoplasms↗

Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Although laparoscopic resection of colorectal carcinoma improves post-operative recovery, long-term survival and disease control are the determining factors for its application. We aimed to test the null hypothesis that there was no difference in survival after laparoscopic and open resection for rectosigmoid cancer. METHODS: From Sept 21, 1993, to Oct 21, 2002, 403 patients with rectosigmoid carcinoma were randomised to receive either laparoscopic assisted (n=203) or conventional open (n=200) resection of the tumour. Survival and disease-free interval were the main endpoints. Patients were last followed-up in March, 2003. Perioperative data were recorded and direct cost of operation estimated. Data were analysed by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The demographic data of the two groups were similar. After curative resection, the probabilities of survival at 5 years of the laparoscopic and open resection groups were 76.1% (SE 3.7%) and 72.9% (4.0%) respectively. The probabilities of being disease free at 5 years were 75.3% (3.7%) and 78.3% (3.7%), respectively. The operative time of the laparoscopic group was significantly longer, whereas postoperative recovery was significantly better than for the open resection group, but these benefits were at the expense of higher direct cost. The distal margin, the number of lymph nodes found in the resected specimen, overall morbidity and operative mortality did not differ between groups. INTERPRETATION: Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma does not jeopardise survival and disease control of patients. The justification for adoption of laparoscopic technique would depend on the perceived value of its effectiveness in improving short-term post-operative outcomes.

Aged↗

MRC CLASICC trial.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Colectomy↗