Biomedical subjects

Rebecca Greene

Publications and source records attributed to Rebecca Greene.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Endoscopic components separation for abdominal compartment syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Sustained intraabdominal pressures of 14 to 20 mm Hg have significant pathophysiological consequences, but there is currently no satisfactory low-morbidity procedure appropriate for intervention early in the disease process of abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). The anatomical principles of abdominal wall components separation were used to develop a percutaneous procedure that increased abdominal capacity and decreased abdominal pressure. METHODS: Using a porcine model, we determined abdominal capacity changes by helium insufflation. Corn oil was then used to create an episode of sustained intraabdominal hypertension and changes in intraabdominal pressure and intestinal mucosal oxygenation were determined. RESULTS: Endoscopic abdominal wall components separation (EACS) increased abdominal capacity by 1 L (from 0.89 +/- 0.39 L to 1.95 +/- 0.48 L; P <0.001). During intraabdominal hypertension, EACS decreased abdominal pressure by 31.6% (from 15.9 +/- 2.1 to 11.0 +/- 1.5 mm Hg; P <0.001). Intestinal PO(2) was increased by 61% (18.8 +/- 11.4 to 30.3 +/- 11.7; P = 0.012) CONCLUSIONS: A minimally invasive procedure (EACS) is feasible and has demonstrated effectiveness in a porcine model of ACS.

Abdominal Wall↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Robotically assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the feasibility and safety of using robotically assisted laparoscopy to perform a Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. This new method was compared with the open and standard laparoscopic approaches. METHODS: Eighteen pigs underwent a needlescopic common bile duct ligation to create a jaundice model. Three to 5 days later, transabdominal ultrasound was performed, and the common bile duct diameter was documented. For the Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy, the pigs were randomly assigned to the open group (n=6), standard laparoscopy group (n=6), or robotically assisted laparoscopy group (Zeus) (n=6). One surgeon performed all 3 approaches with 1 assistant. Operative times, techniques, and complication rates were documented. RESULTS: The open approach was faster in all instances. At the hepaticojejunostomy, no difference was noted between the groups with the total number of stitches used. The robot required fewer stitches and less time in the posterior wall of the hepaticojejunostomy (P=-0.0083 and P=0.02049, respectively). The hepaticojejunostomy time was similar for the laparoscopy and robotically assisted groups. CONCLUSION: Robotically assisted laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy is a feasible procedure. When compared with standard laparoscopy, operating time is similar.

Anastomosis, Roux-en-Y↗