Using Controls for Molecular Cytogenetic Testing in Clinical Practice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Reid G Meyer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Dual-color, dual-fusion fluorescence in situ hybridization (D-FISH) can accurately detect and quantify cells with BCR/ABL fusion in <1% of 500 nuclei in 80% of patients with chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) and t(9;22)(q34;q11.2). The remaining patients have one of three forms of atypical D-FISH patterns; these patterns have different sensitivities to detect disease. Neoplastic cells with one ABL, one BCR, and one BCR/ABL fusion are particularly problematic, because normal cells with coincidental overlap have the same pattern. For these patients, the normal cutoff for D-FISH is >23%. We tested a new method that incorporates an aqua-labeled probe for the argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS) gene into the conventional BCR/ABL D-FISH probe set. This tricolor D-FISH (TD-FISH) method takes advantage of the aqua-labeled ASS probe to distinguish between neoplastic and normal cells. We used TD-FISH to study 20 normal specimens and 35 specimens from 20 patients with known loss of both BCR and ABL from the derivative chromosome 9. The results show that TD-FISH effectively discriminates between cells with overlapping BCR and ABL signals from cells with true BCR/ABL fusion and improves the ability to quantify minimal residual disease from >23% to >1% of 500 interphase nuclei.
t(11;18)(q21;q21) and aneuploidy are recurrent chromosomal aberrations in mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphomas. To investigate their relationship and clinical significance, we developed a two-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique to detect t(11;18) and aneuploidy in nuclei isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue. Thirty-seven MALT lymphomas (all previously evaluated for t(11;18) by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction), 1 large cell lymphoma (LCL) arising subsequent to MALT lymphoma, and 16 controls were tested by FISH using the t(11;18) probe set and multiple centromeric probes. t(11;18)(q21;q21) was present by FISH in 11 of 12 polymerase chain reaction-positive MALT lymphomas (92%). The LCL and its clonally identical antecedent MALT lymphoma both showed t(11;18). The LCL had trisomy 12, and a small subset of MALT lymphoma cells had trisomy 3 and/or 12. Only one other MALT lymphoma with t(11;18) showed aneuploidy (trisomy 3) in a small clone, whereas 15 of 25 t(11;18)-negative MALT lymphomas (60%) showed trisomy of chromosomes 18 (n = 12), 3 (n = 8), 7 (n = 2), and/or 11 (n = 1). t(11;18) and aneuploidy are primarily mutually exclusive events, suggesting different pathogenetic pathways in the development of MALT lymphomas. Both t(11;18) and aneuploidy were seen disproportionately in lung, and both were associated with recurrent disease.
PURPOSE: We determine the sensitivity and specificity of various assays for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 280 voided urine specimens from 265 patients were obtained immediately before cystoscopy for BTA stat, (Bard Diagnostic, Redmond, Washington) hemoglobin dipstick, (Bayer, Elkhart, Indiana) telomerase and UroVysion (Vysis, a wholly owned subsidiary of Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois) analysis. RESULTS: Of the 265 patients 75 had biopsy proven urothelial carcinoma, and the sensitivity of the assays was determined from these patients. From most sensitive to least sensitive, the overall sensitivity of UroVysion (73 cases), BTA stat (72), hemoglobin dipstick (73) and telomerase (70) was 81%, 78%, 74%, and 46%, respectively. Each of the first 3 tests was statistically significantly more sensitive than the telomerase assay (p <0.05). However, the differences in overall sensitivity of UroVysion, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick were not statistically significant. The specificity of the tests was calculated for 80 of the 265 patients in this study who had no history of urothelial carcinoma and negative cystoscopy findings despite common urological complaints. From most specific to least specific, the specificity of UroVysion, telomerase, BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick was 96%, 91%, 74% and 51%, respectively. UroVysion and telomerase were statistically significantly (p <0.01) more specific than the BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick assays, and all of the assays were more specific than hemoglobin dipstick testing (p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that UroVysion is the most sensitive and specific assay among those tested for the detection of urothelial carcinoma. Telomerase testing had good specificity but poor sensitivity. The BTA stat and hemoglobin dipstick tests had good sensitivity but relatively poor specificity. UroVysion is a promising new assay for the detection of urothelial carcinoma in urine specimens. However, further studies are needed to explore the role of the various assays in the treatment of patients with superficial urothelial carcinoma.
PURPOSE: A complete set of subtelomeric fluorescent DNA probes, except the acrocentric p-arms, was developed in 1996, was optimized in 1998, and is commercially available. These and other fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes have been used to detect anomalies of the subtelomere regions among groups of patients with idiopathic mental retardation (MR), developmental delay (DD), and/or nonspecific dysmorphic features (NDF), and individuals with multiple miscarriages (MM) who were karyotypically normal by standard G-banding techniques. METHODS: A total of 425 patients were analyzed, of whom 372 had idiopathic MR/DD/NDF and 53 were involved in MM. An effort was made to select individuals for this study who were either normal karyotypically or who had subtle chromosomal anomalies that were inconclusive by banded chromosome analysis, although this was not always possible. RESULTS: Anomalies involving the subtelomere regions were detected at a frequency of 6.8% in the MR/DD/NDF group. The cryptic or subtle anomalies are estimated to be about 3.4%. It was necessary to use M-FISH, chromosome, and locus specific FISH probes to clarify some of the abnormalities. No abnormalities were detected in the MM group. Deletion variants were present for 2qter, 7pter, and Xpter/Ypter subtelomeric regions ranging from <1 to 9.6%. CONCLUSIONS: The subtelomeric FISH probes are instrumental in the detection of subtelomeric anomalies in a significant proportion, although no more than 50% are subtle, of patients with idiopathic MR/DD/NDF. In some cases, however, it was necessary to use other FISH probes to clarify the nature of these abnormalities. No subtelomeric abnormalities were detected in our group of 53 MM patients, suggesting a relatively low frequency of occurrence in this patient population.