Biomedical subjects

Remy Rikers

Publications and source records attributed to Remy Rikers.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Influence of learning resources on study time and achievement scores in a problem-based curriculum.

Many aspects of the problem-based learning cycle aim at stimulating students to elaborate on their knowledge. This elaborative process is considered to be one of the most effective study aids for learning and applying information. One of the opportunities to stimulate this elaboration process is by offering students more, and more diverse, learning resources. Under laboratory conditions, increasing the richness and diversity of the learning materials has often been shown to support students in learning, remembering and applying information. In this study, a curricular perspective was adopted on the question whether students would benefit from more learning resources. Mean study times and achievement scores for 28 problem-based courses were calculated and included in the analyses. Independent variables in both analyses were the number of primary learning resources (i.e., resources students were recommended to study) and the number of supplementary resources (i.e., related, but non-essential resources). Results showed a significant increase in achievement scores for courses with more primary learning resources, but the effect of supplementary resources was limited.

Educational Measurement↗

PubMed2004

The effects of deliberate practice in undergraduate medical education.

INTRODUCTION: Ericsson and colleagues introduced the term 'deliberate practice' to describe training activities that are especially designed to maximise improvement. They stressed that how much one practises is as important as how one practises. Essential aspects of deliberate practice are the presence of well defined tasks, informative feedback, repetition, self-reflection, motivation and endurance. Deliberate practice is often difficult, laborious, and even unpleasant. Previous studies in the fields of sports and music have shown a positive relation between deliberate practice and level of expertise. PURPOSE: The present study investigated the relationship between several aspects of deliberate practice and study achievements among undergraduate medical students. METHODS: A questionnaire was developed to measure important aspects of deliberate practice. It was filled out by 777 medical students at Maastricht University Medical School (response rate 90%). Scores on 3 regular tests were used to define student levels of expertise. RESULTS: Positive correlations between aspects of deliberate practice (self-study, study resources, planning, study style and motivation) and study achievements were found. Furthermore, high achieving students showed more characteristics of deliberate practice than low achieving students. CONCLUSION: Some important aspects of deliberate practice appear to contribute to the performance of medical students.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Clinical case processing by medical experts and subexperts.

Medical specialists, diagnosing cases within their domain of expertise, do not rely on intentional causal reasoning, in which they use explicit principles or rules of their domain. Rather, their reasoning has become an automatic process using schema-based knowledge. However, the difference between diagnoses made by medical specialists and diagnoses made by nonspecialists (i.e., subexperts) is unclear. In the present study, cardiologists (the experts), pulmonologists (the subexperts), and advanced medical students evaluated two clinical cases within the domain of cardiology. The cases were divided into four components (i.e., patient's history, physical examination, laboratory data, and additional findings) that were sequentially presented. The task was to study, diagnose, and recall the segmented clinical case description. It was expected that the subexperts and students, as a result of their lack of specific expertise, would focus on different case components than the experts would. However, results indicated that the main difference between experts and subexperts (and to a lesser extent, students) was not a difference in emphasis on case components, but the speed and accuracy of processing these case components.

Attitude↗