Biomedical subjects

René J Duquesnoy

Publications and source records attributed to René J Duquesnoy.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

HLAMatchmaker-based analysis of human monoclonal antibody reactivity demonstrates the importance of an additional contact site for specific recognition of triplet-defined epitopes.

Five HLA-A3 reactive human monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) originating from a parous woman were screened against HLA-typed panels by means of complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity, high-definition ELISA, and flow cytometry with single antigen beads. Antibody reactivity profiles were compared with triplet amino acid sequence polymorphisms identified by HLAMatchmaker, and a three-dimensional structural modeling program (Cn3D of the National Center for Biotechnology Information) was used to determine the topography of epitopes recognized by each mAb. These mAbs originated from a woman who during pregnancy developed antibodies to the paternal HLA-A3 antigen of her child. Each mAb was specific for one mismatched triplet on HLA-A3, and the reactivity patterns of these IgM-type mAbs were practically the same in lymphocytotoxicity and antigen-binding assays. One mAb was specific for 163dT, a unique triplet present only on A3. The other mAbs reacted with 62Qe, 142mI, or 144tKr; these triplets are present on different groups of HLA-A alleles, some of which, however, did not react. Topographic modeling of triplet-defined epitopes identified clusters of polymorphic surface residues that were shared between reactive alleles. These clusters may serve as primary contact sites for the specificity-determining complementarity-determining region (CDR) loops of antibody. The reactivity with these mAbs required also the presence of self-sequence elsewhere on the HLA molecular surface as a critical secondary contact site for antibody, likely through another CDR loop. For instance, the reactivity of the 62Qe-specific mAb required the presence of a glycine residue in position 56 and the reactivity of the 142mI-specific mAb required the presence of the GTLRG sequence in positions 79-83. Conversely, there were many other amino acid differences between the mAb-reactive alleles and HLA-A3 that did not prevent antibody binding. For instance, the 62Qe-specific mAb-reactive alleles had 35 and the 142mI-reactive alleles had 50 of such "permissive" residue differences. An HLAMatchmaker-based analysis of the reactivity of human mAbs will increase our understanding of the structural definition of HLA epitopes and their reactivity with alloantibodies.

Alleles↗

PubMed2005

Serum analysis after transplant nephrectomy reveals restricted antibody specificity patterns against structurally defined HLA class I mismatches.

This study deals with HLA-mismatched kidney transplants that have been removed following rejection. Sera from 27 patients were screened for HLA-specific antibodies by direct complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity with HLA-typed cell panels. Circulating donor-specific antibodies were detected in 3 cases (11%) before and in 26 cases (97%) after allograft nephrectomy. These findings demonstrate the production of donor-specific antibodies in patients with rejected transplants, but in most cases, they were undetectable before nephrectomy, because the graft had adsorbed them. With an HLAMatchmaker-based serum analysis program, we observed restricted antibody specificity patterns against amino acid triplet-defined epitopes on donor HLA-A,B antigens. Many donor triplets were non-reactive while others were apparently recognized by antibodies. In some patients, the donor triplet specific antibodies persisted for a long time whereas in many other patients, they became undetectable after a few months. The characterization of the antibody specificity profiles of post-allograft nephrectomy sera is clinically useful in defining criteria of HLA mismatch acceptability for sensitized patients awaiting another transplant. It provides also opportunities for determining the relative immunogenicity of mismatched triplets.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The acceptable mismatch program as a fast tool for highly sensitized patients awaiting a cadaveric kidney transplantation: short waiting time and excellent graft outcome.

There are many highly sensitized patients on the kidney waiting lists of organ exchange organizations because it is difficult to find a crossmatch negative cadaver kidney for these patients. Recently, several protocols have been developed to remove the donor-specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies from the serum of these patients before transplantation. These approaches, including the use of intravenous immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis and immunoglobulins (plasmapheresis-cytomegalovirus-immunoglobulin), and immunoabsorption, seem to lead to a certain success rate, although the additional immunosuppression necessary to remove and control the production of donor-specific alloantibodies may have its impact on the short-term (infections) and long-term (incidence of cancer) immune surveillance. Furthermore, some of these therapies represent a considerable financial burden for patients and society. In the present report, we advocate selection of crossmatch negative donors on the basis of the Acceptable Mismatch Program, as the first and best option for highly sensitized patients to undergo transplantations. No additional immunosuppression is necessary, and graft survival in this group of "difficult" patients is identical to that of nonsensitized recipients. Because the nature of the HLA polymorphism does not allow all patients to profit from this approach, removal of circulating HLA antibodies can be considered as a rescue therapy for those patients for whom the Acceptable Mismatch Program does not give a solution.

Cadaver↗

PubMed2004

Beneficial effect of matching at the HLA-A and -B amino-acid triplet level on rejection-free clear graft survival in penetrating keratoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The beneficial effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching on long-term prognosis in penetrating keratoplasty is now unequivocal but has to be weighed against the additional waiting period on an individual basis. HLAMatchmaker is a molecularly based algorithm for histocompatibility determination that can identify immunologically acceptable mismatches and thus potentially reduce time on the waiting list dramatically without negatively affecting prognosis. METHODS: The HLAMatchmaker algorithm (triplet-string matching) was applied on each of 545 normal-risk keratoplasties for which complete HLA type was known at split-level resolution. Two homogeneous groups were defined. Group I consisted of the 147 penetrating keratoplasties with up to 13 triplet-string mismatches (the typical upper limit of foreign in case of a single HLA-A or HLA-B allele mismatch) and was compared to the remaining 398 patients with more triplet mismatches (group II) using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank statistics. Analysis of clear graft survival on the basis of conventional HLA-A and HLA-B matching was performed as well. Reduction of time on the waiting list as compared to conventional HLA-A and HLA-B matching was predicted individually. RESULTS: Triplet-string matching yielded 85% rejection-free clear graft survival 3 years after penetrating keratoplasty in group I but only 76% in group II (P<0.05), whereas conventional HLA-A and HLA-B matching did not result in any statistically significant reduction of immune reactions because of lack of statistical power (P=0.08). Triplet-string matching (13 mismatches accepted) reduces median time on the waiting list by 80%. CONCLUSIONS: Triplet-string matching seems to improve mid- to long-term prognosis in penetrating keratoplasties while simultaneously reducing time on the waiting list in most cases. It should thus be considered for histocompatibility determination in penetrating keratoplasty.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Multilaboratory evaluation of serum analysis for HLA antibody and crossmatch reactivity by lymphocytotoxicity methods.

CONTEXT: This report presents results of the serum antibody analysis and crossmatch challenges in the proficiency testing program for histocompatibility testing jointly sponsored by the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics and the College of American Pathologists. OBJECTIVE: To obtain information about consensus rates among participating laboratories that reported antibody screening and crossmatch results by direct complement-dependent lymphocytotoxicity (CDC) and/or anti-human globulin (AHG)-augmentation methods. DESIGN: We analyzed responses from approximately 165 laboratories participating in 32 surveys during 1993-2000. Most of the testing was done by CDC methods, but increasing proportions of laboratories are using AHG augmentation of these techniques; almost one half of the serum screenings and crossmatches were done by AHG. RESULTS: A total of 40 serum specimens were screened to determine the percent panel-reactive antibody (PRA) and identify HLA-specific antibodies. Participants often reported very wide ranges of PRA values. Panel-reactive antibody ranges exceeded 60 percentage points for 16 (40%) of the serum screening results by CDC and for 31 (77%) of the results by AHG. The interlaboratory variability of PRA values suggests that in many laboratories, the CDC or AHG procedures were often too insensitive or overly sensitive. The antibody identification results revealed inconsistent patterns among the participants performing CDC or AHG screening. Most participants reported the same primary antibody specificities by both methods. The consensus levels were generally high for the monospecific sera. On the other hand, there was much less agreement among the participants if the sera reacted with 2 or more HLA antigens. Participants using the more sensitive AHG method reported additional antibody specificities in many specimens, but invariably the consensus levels were rather low. A total of 192 serum-cell combinations were used for the crossmatch challenges. There was considerable interlaboratory variability; 21% of the CDC crossmatches and 36% of AHG crossmatches failed to reach the 90% consensus threshold. CONCLUSIONS: This experience demonstrates considerable inconsistencies in serum screening and crossmatching among laboratories participating in the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics/College of American Pathologists surveys. A lack of uniformity in test results may limit the efficient application of these methods in a clinical setting. Standardization of crossmatch and antibody screening techniques is highly desirable.

Antibody Specificity↗

PubMed2002

HLAMatchmaker: a molecularly based algorithm for histocompatibility determination. II. Verification of the algorithm and determination of the relative immunogenicity of amino acid triplet-defined epitopes.

HLAMatchmaker is a computer algorithm that assesses human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility at the structural level by intralocus and interlocus comparisons of polymorphic amino acid triplets in antibody-accessible sequences of HLA class I molecules. This program permits the identification of mismatched HLA antigens that share all of their polymorphic triplets with the patient's HLA antigens and, therefore, could be considered fully compatible. The validity of this algorithm has been verified by analyzing the antibody specificity patterns of 127 well-characterized sera (panel reactive antibody [PRA] > 80%) that had been screened by direct complement-dependent and/or anti-human globulin augmented lymphocytotoxicity testing with large HLA-typed cell panels. A 2 x 2 table-based Chi-square analysis program was applied to determine positive and negative correlations between serum reactivity and the presence HLA triplets assigned from the HLA types in the cell panel. The results indicate that high PRA patients do not produce antibodies to shared triplets on mismatched HLA antigens. Moreover, this serum analysis has permitted the identification of triplets with different degrees of immunogenicity as indicated by the frequencies of positive and negative correlations of serum reactivity with the HLA-typed cell panel. Mismatching for triplets with low immunogenicity provides further opportunities for identifying donors with acceptable HLA mismatches for highly sensitized patients.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2002

HLAMatchmaker: a molecularly based algorithm for histocompatibility determination. I. Description of the algorithm.

This report describes an algorithm for identifying acceptable HLA antigens for highly alloimmunized patients without the need for extensive serum screening. This algorithm is based on the concept that immunogenic epitopes are represented by amino acid triplets on exposed parts of protein sequences of human leukocyte antigen chains (HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C) accessible to alloantibodies. A computer program (HLAMatchmaker) has been developed to determine class I HLA compatibility at the molecular level. It makes intralocus and interlocus comparisons of polymorphic triplets in sequence positions to determine the spectrum of non-shared triplets on donor HLA antigens. In most cases is it possible to identify certain mismatched HLA antigens that share all their polymorphic triplets with the patient's HLA antigens and could therefore, be considered fully compatible. HLAMatchmaker permits also the identification of additional mismatches that are acceptable as determined from the triplet information on HLA-typed panel cells that do not react with patient's serum.HLAMatchmaker provides an assessment of donor-recipient HLA compatibility at the structural level and this algorithm is different from conventional methods based on the mere counting of numbers of mismatched HLA antigens or CREGs. This donor selection strategy is suitable especially for allosensitized patients in need of a compatible transplant or platelet transfusion.

Algorithms↗