PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Renate Burgemeister

Publications and source records attributed to Renate Burgemeister.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

Enhanced molecular analyses by combination of the HOPE-technique and laser microdissection.

As part of an investigation aimed at illuminating the possibilities and limits of the HOPE-fixation and paraffin-embedding technique we here describe a novel procedure which was developed in order to combine the benefits of the HOPE-technique with the capabilities of laser microdissection. The presented procedure avoids the need for amplification of template-RNA thus facilitating reliable and reproducible results. The excellent preservation of nucleic acids, proteins, and morphology in HOPE-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues enhances the molecular applications available to date with materials acquired by laser microdissection when compared to formalin fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues, thus substantially extending the methodological panel in tissue based research.

Journal Article↗

New aspects of laser microdissection in research and routine.

Laser microdissection has opened a window to new technologies. The scientific fields of genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics need pure samples for rendering reliable results. Homogeneous sample preparation is a prerequisite for modern molecular analyses, both qualitative and quantitative. Laser microdissection and pressure catapulting (LMPC) is a tool for isolating specific cells from complex tissues in a non-contact and contamination-free manner. Because LMPC technology is an optimal method for obtaining fast and reliable access to single cells, the possibility of automatic isolation of single fetal cells has the promise of being a big step forward in developing protocols for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis.

Animals↗

Noncontact laser microdissection and pressure catapulting: sample preparation for genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic analysis.

The understanding of the molecular mechanisms of cellular metabolism and proliferation necessitates accurate identification, isolation, and finally characterization of a specific cell or a population of cells and subsequently their subsets of biomolecules. For the simultaneous analysis of thousands of molecular parameters within a single experiment, as realized by DNA, RNA, and protein microarray technologies, a defined number of homogeneous cells derived from a distinct morphological origin is required. Sample preparation is therefore a very crucial step for high-resolution downstream applications. Laser microdissection and laser pressure catapulting (LMPC) enables such pure and homogeneous sample preparation, resulting in an eminent increase in the specificity of molecular analyses. For microdissection, the force of focused laser light is used to excise selected cells or large tissue areas from object slides or from living cell culture down to a resolution of individual single cells and subcellular components like organelles or chromosomes, respectively. After microdissection this sample is directly catapulted into an appropriate collection device. As the entire process works without any mechanical contact, it enables pure sample retrieval from morphologically defined origin without cross contamination. Wherever homogenous samples are required for subsequent analysis of, e.g., cell areas, single cells, or chromosomes, the PALM MicroBeam system is an indispensable tool. The integration of image analysis platforms fully automates screening, identification, and finally subsequent high-throughput sample handling. These samples can be directly linked into versatile downstream applications, such as single-cell mRNA-extraction, different PCR methods, microarray techniques, and many others. Acceleration in sample generation vastly increases the throughput in molecular laboratories and leads to an increasing knowledge about differentially regulated mRNAs and expressed proteins, providing new insights into cellular mechanisms and therefore enabling the development of systems for tumor biomarker identification, early detection of disease-causing alterations, therapeutic targeting and/or patient-tailored therapy.

Animals↗

Regional heterogeneity of EGFR gene amplification and nuclear morphology in glioblastomas. An investigation using laser microdissection and pressure catapulting.

OBJECTIVE: To study the regional heterogeneity of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification (EGFR-GA) in glioblastomas, considering the relationship between this mutation and morphology of tumor cell nuclei. STUDY DESIGN: Tissue samples gained by laser microdissection and pressure catapulting were used for the performance of differential polymerase chain reaction in 32 morphologically different regions from 7 glioblastomas. Semiquantitative determination of EGFR expression and image analysis of tumor cell nuclei were performed in the same regions. RESULTS: Distinct regional differences concerning the degree of EGFR-GA were found in 2 tumor cases. When comparing regions with different degrees of gene amplification within these cases, morphologic differences in tumor cell nuclei were observed. The other tumor cases also showed distinct intratumoral heterogeneity concerning histomorphology but no regional heterogeneity in the degree of EGFR-GA. When comparing regions with a low densitometric EGFR/interferon (INF) band ratio (< 2.19, n = 18) and a high EGFR/IFN band ratio (> 4.39, n = 14), the latter type of region showed a significantly higher percentage of Ki-67--positive tumor cell nuclei and lower values for several shape variables (Fourier amplitudes), indicating a tendency toward a more regular nuclear shape in regions with distinct EGFR-GA. For the EGFR/IFN band ratio, a significant correlation was found with several morphometric variables, especially those of nuclear shape and distances between nuclei. CONCLUSION: In glioblastomas showing regional heterogeneity in the degree of EGFR-GA, morphology of tumor cell nuclei has been shown to be different when comparing regions with different degrees of EGFR-GA. Glioblastomas may also show distinct regional heterogeneity of histomorphology without evidence of regional heterogeneity of EGFR-GA. A significant statistical association has been confirmed between the degree of EGFR-GA and quantitative morphology of tumor cell nuclei.

Brain Neoplasms↗

Live cell catapulting and recultivation.

Laser micromanipulation systems are used worldwide in the field of life science research. Most of their applications focus on the isolation of specific cells from different types of tissue and the manipulation of subcellular structures within fixed or living cells. Using the PALM MicroBeam, it is possible to microdissect living cells from a cell culture, to catapult them into collection devices, and to re-cultivate the isolated cells. For this purpose, new protocols and special equipment were developed. It has also been demonstrated that Laser Microdissection and Pressure Catapulting (LMPC) have no influence on the proliferation rate of the cells. Even re-cultivated cell colonies, trypsinized and seeded out again, are still viable after a second LMPC-procedure. This new approach opens a wide field of interesting applications in cell biology, molecular pathology, and pharmacology.

Dissection↗

Laser microdissection and pressure catapulting (LMPC) in paraffin sections mounted on glass slides. A methodological report.

The technique of laser microdissection together with laser pressure catapulting (LMPC) is demonstrated in paraffin sections obtained from surgical specimens of brain tumors mounted on glass slides. A sufficient and precise application of microdissection techniques in tissue on glass slides is worthwhile, since it offers the possibility of a retrospective analysis of archived paraffin sections in histopathology. We could demonstrate a precise dissection of areas in tissues of different thicknesses (4 microm and 20 microm). Areas of tissue mounted directly on glass need to be dissected in a scanning mode in order to remove the total region in form of small tissue fragments row by row. This mode provided a precise microdissection of tissue areas of different sizes and shapes. A successful molecular biological analysis of the microdissected regions could be demonstrated. As an example for such an analysis, differential-PCR for detecting an amplification of the gene for the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) was performed.

Central Nervous System Neoplasms↗

High quality RNA retrieved from samples obtained by using LMPC (laser microdissection and pressure catapulting) technology.

Isolation of intact RNA in high quality is the first and often the most critical step in performing many fundamental molecular biology experiments, and is essential for many techniques used in gene expression analysis. As many factors influence nucleic acid preservation, RNA isolation should include some important steps before and after the actual RNA extraction. We tested the influence of fixation and staining protocols regarding RNA integrity and concentration. A factor that is often underestimated is the absolute necessity for homogenous starting materials. Application of the LMPC technology allows for a rapidand highly precise procurement of purified cell populations suitable for a variety of downstream analyses.

Animals↗

Differential radioactive proteomic analysis of microdissected renal cell carcinoma tissue by 54 cm isoelectric focusing in serial immobilized pH gradient gels.

We present a proof of principle study, using laser microdissection and pressure catapulting (LMPC) of two clinical tissue samples, each containing approximately 3.8 microg renal cell carcinoma protein and 3.8 microg normal kidney protein respectively from one patient. The study involved separate radio-iodination of each sample with both (125)I and (131)I, dual inverse replicate sample loading to high resolution 54 cm "daisy chain" serial immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing (IPG-IEF) 2D-PAGE gels, co-electrophoretic separation of cross-labeled proteins from different samples, and precision multiplex differential radioactive imaging to obtain signals specific for each sample coelectrophoresed within single gels but labeled with different isotopes of iodine, providing extremely precise intra-gel estimates of the abundance ratio for protein spots from both samples. Twelve multiplexed analytical radioactive SDS-gels from 4 serial IPG-IEF gels provided 24 individual radioactive images for a comprehensive analytical protein multiplex quantification study. A further 12 SDS gels containing (125)I-labeled sample were coelectrophoresed with preparative protein amounts obtained from whole tissue sections for the mass spectrometric identification of comigrating proteins. This consumed <40% of the (125)I-labeled sample, and <20% of the (131)I-labeled sample from the respective original 3.8 microg samples. Twenty-nine proteins were identified by mass spectrometry with PMF scores >70 that were >2-fold differentially abundant between the samples and t-test probabilities <0.05. We conclude that this combination of technologies provides excellent quality protein multiplex data for the differential abundance analysis of large numbers of proteins from extremely small samples, and is applicable to a broad range of clinical and related applications.

Carcinoma, Renal Cell↗