PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Renaud Bollens

Publications and source records attributed to Renaud Bollens.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: a new technique to maximize the length of the renal vein using a modified Endo GIA stapler.

OBJECTIVES: To report the utilization of a modified Endo GIA vascular stapler to obtain the full length of the renal vein during transperitoneal laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy. METHODS: We used a modified Endo GIA stapler, in which the triple staggered rows of staples were removed from the kidney donor side to obtain the full length of the right renal vein. This technique has currently been used in nine consecutive transperitoneal laparoscopic right donor nephrectomies. RESULTS: With this technique, the entire right renal vein length was harvested in all cases, without vascular complications. Mean renal warm ischemia time from clamping of the renal vessels to cold perfusion was 135s, and mean receptor postoperative glomerular filtration rate after 30 d was 67.3 ml/min. There were no graft losses. CONCLUSIONS: A novel technique for laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy is described. It allows harvesting the full length of the right renal vein in a safe and feasible way without compromising warm ischemia time.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma: results of a Belgian retrospective multicentre survey.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the technical and oncologic feasibility of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective survey of 100 patients, treated with laparoscopic nephroureterectomy in 10 Belgian centres, was performed. Most procedures were performed transperitoneally. The distal ureter was managed by open surgery in 55 patients and laparoscopically in 45 patients. The mean follow-up was 20 mo. RESULTS: Mean operation time was 192 min and mean blood loss 234 ml. The conversion rate was 7%. Important postoperative complications were seen in 9%. Pathologic staging was pTa in 31 patients, pT1 in 23, pT2 in 12, pT3 in 33, and pT4 in 1, concomittant pTis in 3. Pathologic grade was G1 in 24 patients, G2 in 28, and G3 in 48. Negative surgical margins were obtained in all but one patient. Twenty-five patients developed progressive disease (24%) at a mean postoperative time of 9 mo (local recurrence in 8%, metastases in 11%, both in 5%). Progression was 0% for pTa, 17% for pT1, 17% for pT2, 51% for pT3, and 100% for pT4. Cancer-specific survival was 100% for pTa, 86% for pT1, 100% for pT2, 77% for pT3, and 0% for pT4. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy appears to be a technically and oncologically feasible operation. To prevent tumour seeding, one should avoid opening the urinary tract and should extract the specimen with an intact organ bag. The high local recurrence rate in this study probably reflects the high percentage of high-grade and high-stage tumours in this study.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the learning curve.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is now an accepted treatment option for the management of localized prostate cancer. Numerous studies have demonstrated the feasibility and the reproducibility of this procedure. Expert teams in high-volume centres routinely carry out laparoscopic radical prostatectomy but for the novice the obstacle to success is how to learn and gain proficiency in this procedure. In this review, we will present our views on how this can be done. RECENT FINDINGS: A learning curve includes the necessity for continuous self-evaluation in terms of cancer control, continence and potency. Many different methods can be used to acquire the technique: dry lab, animal live lab, cadaveric laparoscopic dissection or mentoring with an expert. All of these steps may not be essential as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is not too dissimilar to open prostatectomy. However, one must understand that the physiological consequences of anaesthesia during laparoscopy and basic laparoscopic suturing technique should be perfected prior to taking on laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. The training then must continue under the supervision of a mentor. The opportunity for discussion with an expert allows the novice to learn the pitfalls and the tips and tricks of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, thus reducing the length of the learning curve and negating the need to reinvent the wheel. SUMMARY: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy is similar to any other new surgical procedure and as with open surgery we learn and gain experience with each procedure; the learning curve is never completely finished.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Is seminal vesicle ablation mandatory for all patients undergoing radical prostatectomy? A multivariate analysis on 1283 patients.

OBJECTIVE: With a shift in prostate cancer stage and a majority of patients operated nowadays with PSA levels <10 ng/ml, rates of seminal vesicle (SV) invasion found on radical prostatectomy specimens have decreased as compared to historical data. Since SV-sparing surgery may possibly have an influence on post-operative erectile dysfunction and urinary recovery, we tried to determine which patients could be safely spared SV excision during radical prostatectomy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used preoperative data from 1283 patients operated by radical retropubic prostatectomy--777 with serum PSA <10.0 ng/ml--to predict SV invasion on final pathological examination. Variables analyzed included age, digital rectal examination, serum PSA, biopsy Gleason score and percentage of biopsy cores invaded by prostate cancer. Statistical analysis included univariate, multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Out of 1283 patients, 137 (10.6%) had SV involvement, 41/777 (5.2%) with PSA <10.0 ng/ml, 16.1% in the 10-20 ng/ml range and 26.2% when PSA was >20 ng/ml. Percentage of biopsies affected by prostate cancer and biopsy Gleason score were significant predictors of SV invasion in multivariate analysis, both in the entire population and in the subset of patients with PSA <10.0 ng/ml (p < 0.0001). Probability graphs created for patients with PSA <10 ng/ml indicate a risk of seminal invasion <5% when Gleason score on biopsy is <7 or when the percentage of biopsies affected by cancer is <50%. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of SV might not be "oncologically" necessary in all patients undergoing RP when PSA levels are below 10 ng/ml except when biopsy Gleason score is > or =7 or when more than 50% of prostate biopsy cores show cancer involvement. SV-sparing surgery could be prospectively compared to standard retropubic prostatectomy in selected individuals analyzing potential benefits on erectile function and urinary continence.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Radical prostatectomy: a prospective comparison of oncological and functional results between open and laparoscopic approaches.

We prospectively compared, within the same center and during the same period of time, the perioperative parameters as well as the oncological and functional results of both open retropubic (ORP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). From September 1999 to September 2001, 162 patients with prostate cancer were treated with radical prostatectomy, 77 using an open retropubic technique, and 85 by the laparoscopic extraperitoneal approach. We prospectively recorded pre-, per- and postoperative parameters and complications, and evaluated the carcinological and functional results, comparing both approaches. There were no significant differences in the preoperative characteristics of the two groups. Mean operative time was statistically longer with LRP than with ORP (288 vs 168 min, P<0.0001) but median blood loss was decreased (400 vs 1,300 ml, P<0.0001). Major complications occurred in a similar number of cases (5% vs 2.4%, NS) while minor complications occurred more frequently with ORP (24.6 vs 11.8%, P=0.003). Pathological examination revealed a similar distribution of Gleason scores and stages in each group. Positive surgical margins in pT2 cases occurred in 7.8% of LRP and 7.3% of ORP. Continence rates (no pad and no leakage at all) were similar (83.9% in ORP vs 80.7% in LRP, NS). Potency rates were similar after 1 year in patients undergoing bilateral nerve sparing (55% in ORP vs 65% in LRP, NS). However, patients operated by LRP had more spontaneous erections. We conclude that this prospective, comparative study shows that LRP, when performed in specialized centers, gives oncological and functional results comparable to open surgery.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy techniques.

Over the past years, laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has emerged as an attractive, exciting, and new approach for the surgical treatment of localized prostate cancer. Several centers in Europe and the United States have developed their own technique and have already published their first results. Two main routes have been used, namely, the transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches. Data from the literature and available experience demonstrate that this laparoscopic procedure is feasible and teachable and that oncologic and functional results seem comparable to those of classic open radical prostatectomy. Minimal bleeding, reduced blood transfusion rates, shorter hospitalization, and shorter recovery time are unquestionable advantages for laparoscopic procedures. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy remains a difficult intervention and should be performed in selected centers with experienced teams who already have extensive laparoscopic experience and who recruit enough patients to grant them the proper amount of expertise. This is the only way to achieve excellence in terms of oncologic and functional results.

Humans↗