PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rendon C Nelson

Publications and source records attributed to Rendon C Nelson.

32 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Single versus multi-detector row CT: comparison of radiation doses and dose profiles.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was twofold: (a) to compare the radiation dose profile between computed tomography (CT) with a single detector row (SD) and with a multi-detector row (MD) and (b) to compare specific organ doses between SD CT and MD CT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimeters placed within a 32-cm-diameter cylindrical phantom were used to measure and compare dose profiles from one SD CT scanner and from one MD CT scanner. SD CT scanning parameters were 210 mA, 140 kVp, pitch of 1.0, 5-mm section thickness, and 0.8-second gantry rotation speed. MD CT scanning parameters were 130 mA, 140 kVp, pitch of 0.75, 4 x 5-mm section thickness, 15-mm table feed, and 0.8-second gantry rotation speed. To plot radiation dose profile, doses were measured both in the imaging plane and in the area adjacent to the imaging plane. The resultant data were normalized to achieve constant image noise between MD CT and SD CT. Direct doses to individual organs from primary and scattered radiation were measured with an anthropomorphic phantom containing thermoluminescent dosimeters and with a standard pelvic imaging protocol for both MD CT and SD CT. RESULTS: MD CT resulted in a dose profile approximately 27% higher than that from SD CT in the plane of imaging (8.0 vs 6.3 mGy) and 69% higher adjacent to the plane of imaging (6.8 vs 4.0 mGy). The individual doses to the kidneys, uterus, ovaries, and pelvic bone marrow were 92%-180% higher with MD CT than with SD CT. CONCLUSION: With image noise constant between SD CT and MD CT, the radiation dose profile both inside and outside the plane of imaging was higher with MD CT than with SD CT. Organ dose also was higher with MD CT than with SD CT. This difference should be accounted for in the design of MD CT protocols, especially as MD CT technology becomes more widely available for clinical use.

Female↗
PubMed2002

Outcome analysis of patients with acute pancreatitis by using an artificial neural network.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to evaluate the ability of an artificial neural network (ANN) that uses radiologic and laboratory data to predict the outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An ANN was constructed with data from 92 patients with acute pancreatitis who underwent computed tomography (CT). Input nodes included clinical, laboratory, and CT data. The ANN was trained and tested by using a round-robin technique, and the performance of the ANN was compared with that of linear discriminant analysis and Ranson and Balthazar grading systems by using receiver operating characteristic analysis. The length of hospital stay was used as an outcome measure. RESULTS: Hospital stay ranged from 0 to 45 days, with a mean of 8.4 days. The hospital stay was shorter than the mean for 62 patients and longer than the mean for 30. The 23 input features were reduced by using stepwise linear discriminant analysis, and an ANN was developed with the six most statistically significant parameters (blood pressure, extent of inflammation, fluid aspiration, serum creatinine level, serum calcium level, and the presence of concurrent severe illness). With these features, the ANN successfully predicted whether the patient would exceed the mean length of stay (Az = 0.83 +/- 0.05). Although the Az performance of the ANN was statistically significantly better than that of the Ranson (Az = 0.68 +/- 0.06, P < .02) and Balthazar (Az = 0.62 +/- 0.06, P < .003) grades, it was not significantly better than that of linear discriminant analysis (Az = 0.82 +/- 0.05, P = .53). CONCLUSION: An ANN may be useful for predicting outcome in patients with acute pancreatitis.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2002

The role of F-18 FDG positron emission tomography in preoperative assessment of the liver in patients being considered for curative resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The authors' goal was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for identifying patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer and the accuracy of PET for determining the number and distribution of lesions within the liver. Intraoperative sonography and surgical inspection and palpation were used as the reference standard. METHODS: Twenty-three patients being evaluated for surgical resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma underwent FDG PET before operation. Findings of the PET studies were reviewed in a blinded, retrospective manner, with the results compared with the findings of intraoperative sonography and surgical exploration. Lesions of all sizes were considered in the analysis. RESULTS: The FDG-PET results were positive in 21 of the 22 patients ultimately found to have metastatic disease to the liver, and they were negative in the single patient without metastases. Therefore, for identification of patients with hepatic metastatic disease, PET has a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 100%. In all, 48 metastatic lesions were identified in these patients, of which 38 (79%) were identified on PET images. The probability of lesion detection by PET was directly correlated with lesion size (P < 0.01). The assessment of lobar disease distribution in the liver was discordant between PET and surgery in 3 of 23 (13%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In patients being evaluated for potential curative resection of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer, FDG PET is accurate for the identification of the presence or absence of metastatic disease to the liver. However, detection of individual lesions depends on their size, and determination of lesion number and distribution within the liver is more accurately accomplished with intraoperative sonography.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Liver: single breath-hold dynamic subtraction CT with multi-detector row helical technology feasibility study.

Fifty-two patients with known or suspected hypervascular malignancy were examined to determine the technical feasibility of performing single-breath-hold dynamic subtraction computed tomography (CT) of the liver with multi-detector row helical CT. The precontrast and hepatic arterial CT scans, which were acquired during the same breath hold, were subtracted. The mean liver-to-muscle contrast ratio on the precontrast, hepatic arterial, and subtracted images was 1.3, 1.4, and 2.3, respectively. In 13 patients with lesions, the subtracted images showed a 2.5-fold increase in mean lesion contrast compared with the hepatic arterial CT scans.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of MR cholangiopancreatographic techniques with contrast-enhanced cholangiography in the evaluation of sclerosing cholangitis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to compare MR cholangiopancreatography and contrast-enhanced cholangiography in patients with sclerosing cholangitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with sclerosing cholangitis were evaluated on MR cholangiopancreatography using the single-shot fast spin-echo technique at 1.5 T. A group of 19 healthy volunteers underwent MR cholangiopancreatography as controls. Thick-slab (2-cm sections) coronal oblique and thin-slab (5-mm sections) interleaved straight coronal MR images were obtained. All patients with sclerosing cholangitis had an MR cholangiopancreatogram within 12 months of a contrast-enhanced cholangiogram (mean, 3.8 months). Seventy-five percent of patients had an MR cholangiopancreatogram within 3 months of the contrast-enhanced cholangiogram. The MR cholangiopancreatograms and contrast-enhanced cholangiograms were reviewed independently in a random fashion by two radiologists who were unaware of clinical history for the degree of ductal visualization and for the presence and location of strictures of the intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts. All discrepancies were resolved by a consensus, and the contrast-enhanced cholangiograms were regarded as the gold standard. Statistically significant data were calculated using the signed rank test (p < 0.01), and agreement analysis was calculated using Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: All findings on MR cholangiopancreatograms in healthy subjects were interpreted as normal, and all findings on MR cholangiopancreatograms in patients with sclerosing cholangitis were interpreted as abnormal. When compared with the control group, scans of patients with sclerosing cholangitis usually showed good visualization (>50%) of the intrasegmental (86% vs 9%) and peripheral (67% vs 0%) intrahepatic ducts on thick-slab MR cholangiopancreatography. Thick-slab MR cholangiopancreatography showed good visualization in more ducts than contrast cholangiography (84% vs 70%; p = 0.10) and showed more strictured ducts than contrast cholangiography (47% vs 36%; p = 0.22). When comparing those ducts with good visualization on both MR cholangiopancreatography and contrast cholangiography, we found that disagreement occurred regarding 32% of ducts. Most of the discrepancies (60%) resulted when a stricture was noted on MR cholangiopancreatography but not on contrast-enhanced cholangiography. Good interobserver agreement (kappa > 0.4) was noted for detecting strictures of the extrahepatic, left hepatic, left medial, and right posterior ducts, with the greatest agreement for extrahepatic ductal strictures (kappa = 0.8). CONCLUSION: Thick-slab MR cholangiopancreatography is the best technique for depicting normal and strictured bile ducts and allows the differentiation of healthy patients from patients with sclerosing cholangitis. Although endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was considered the standard, MR cholangiopancreatography was superior for intrahepatic biliary ductal visualization. Therefore, this technique is of value in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with sclerosing cholangitis.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Thin-section multidetector CT angiography of renal artery stents.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken as a pilot investigation to compare multidetector CT angiography with conventional catheter angiography for the visualization of the renal artery lumen after renal artery stent placement. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: CT angiography was performed within 24-48 hr of renal artery stent placement in 15 patients. Two patients had bilateral stents, resulting in a total of 17 stents. CT angiography was performed using a multidetector scanner and a bolus of IV contrast material with the scanning delay determined by a small-volume timing bolus. A volumetric data set was acquired through the stented arteries in the axial plane using a 4.0 x 1.25 mm detector configuration and a pitch of 3:1. The stent lumen diameter, as measured on direct CT angiography and curved multiplanar reformations in both the axial and coronal planes, was compared with that measured on catheter angiography. RESULTS: The lumina of all 17 stents were well visualized and patent on both CT angiography and catheter angiography. Anatomic definition, including stent position and wall apposition in the renal artery, correlated well with catheter angiography. The diameter of the renal artery stent lumen measured on catheter angiography (mean, 5.9 +/- 1.3 mm) was greater than that on CT angiography (mean stent lumen diameter for direct axial plane was 4.6 +/- 1.0 mm, for curved multiplanar reformations in the axial plane was 4.3 +/- 1.0 mm, and for curved multiplanar reformations in the coronal plane was 4.4 +/- 1.0 mm) in 14 (82%) of 17 stents. CONCLUSION: CT angiography produced interpretable multiplanar images of the renal artery, even with a metallic stent in place, and was adequate for determining stent patency. Compared with catheter angiography, the intrastent luminal diameter was underestimated in most patients who underwent CT angiography.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pseudoenhancement of simple renal cysts: a comparison of single and multidetector helical CT.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to compare the extent of pseudoenhancement (artifactual increase in measured attenuation of a simple cyst after contrast medium administration) in a phantom model on single detector and multidetector helical CT scanners. METHOD: The phantom consisted of four water-filled spheres varying in size from 8 to 28 mm, suspended in an aqueous contrast medium bath. Iodine concentration in the bath was varied: 0, 6, 12, and 24 mg/ml corresponding to attenuation values of 0, +108, +180, and +300 HU. The phantom was scanned on single detector and multidetector helical CT scanners during the same session. Collimation (1, 3, and 5 mm) and pitch (1 and 1.5:1, single detector; 3:1 and 6:1, multidetector) were varied at each concentration. All scans were performed at 140 kVp and 170 mA. The region of interest was measured at the center of each sphere. The effects were analyzed using a linear regression model. RESULTS: The degree of pseudoenhancement was more pronounced with increasing iodine concentration, decreasing cyst size, and wider collimation (all p = 0.0001). Pseudoenhancement was also more marked on the multidetector than the single detector scanner (p = 0.0001). At physiological levels of renal enhancement, the average pseudoenhancement was +18 HU for the single detector versus +23 HU for the multidetector scanner. Variation in pitch had no effect. CONCLUSION: Pseudoenhancement is greater on a multidetector than a single detector helical CT scanner and may exceed 20 HU at physiological levels of renal enhancement.

Contrast Media↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Liver imaging with multidetector helical computed tomography.

The speed and flexibility of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) have led to improvements in liver imaging, particularly related to the detection and characterization of focal lesions. This report discusses the different phase of liver enhancement following the bolus administration of iodinated contrast material, and the enhancement pattern of various liver lesions during these phases. We also propose guidelines for designing protocols for MDCT of the liver and discuss the principles of contrast media delivery.

Contrast Media↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Abdominal imaging with multidetector computed tomography: state of the art.

This article is based on lectures which were given at the Multidetector Computed Tomography Conference in Washington, D.C. on September 13-14, 2003. Specifically, this article summarizes the Abdominal Imaging Section of this meeting. It is not an exhaustive review, but it rather attempts to highlight key points related to preoperative MDCT of the liver, MDCT of pancreas, MDCT urography and MDCT of thoracoabdominal and spinal trauma.

Abdominal Injuries↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Dual gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase hepatic MR imaging: a useful tool for evaluating more than fatty infiltration or fatty sparing.

A T1-weighted gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase sequence has become a routine part of every hepatic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging protocol. Although this sequence is primarily used to identify common pathologic conditions, such as diffuse or focal steatosis and focal fatty sparing, it is also helpful in detection of pathologic entities associated with T2* effects owing to the double-echo approach. Thus, pathologic conditions such as hemochromatosis or hemosiderosis can be identified and characterized with a high level of confidence. In cases of iron storage disease, the hepatic parenchymal signal intensity decreases on the image with the longer echo time due to the continued decay of the transverse magnetization. In addition, susceptibility artifacts can be easily detected and characterized with in-phase and opposed-phase MR imaging. Metallic objects demonstrate a larger susceptibility artifact on the image with the second or longer echo time, which is usually the in-phase image. Finally, intrahepatic pneumobilia can be identified with the T1-weighted gradient-echo in-phase and opposed-phase sequence because gas also causes a susceptibility artifact, which is more pronounced on the image with the longer echo time. A complete understanding of both the chemical shift cancellation artifact and the T2* effects of the in-phase and opposed-phase sequence is important for correct interpretation of hepatic MR images.

Diagnosis, Differential↗