PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rene Scheenstra

Publications and source records attributed to Rene Scheenstra.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Cyclosporine A withdrawal during follow-up after pediatric liver transplantation.

It is unclear whether cyclosporine A (CsA) can be withdrawn safely during follow-up after pediatric liver transplantation. In our transplant program we have been using a strict protocol to withdraw CsA. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the effects of CsA withdrawal after pediatric liver transplantation on the incidence of rejection and renal function. Between 1986 and 2001, 91 children received CsA for at least 2 yr after liver transplantation. Specific criteria for eligibility to withdraw CsA were set. In 53 of the 91 children CsA was withdrawn. In 35 patients (66%) withdrawal of CsA did not cause rejection. In these patients the renal function improved compared with baseline values (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) at 1 yr, +16 mL/minute/1.73 m3, P < 0.001; at 2 yr, +10 mL/minute/1.73 m3, P < 0.05). After CsA withdrawal, 18 patients developed rejection (34%), which could be effectively treated by methylprednisolone and restarting CsA. Failure to withdraw CsA was not associated with increased incidence of graft loss. A body weight below 10 kg at the time of transplantation correlated significantly with successful withdrawal of CsA (<10 kg, 85% vs. > 10 kg, 60%; P < 0.05). In conclusion CsA can successfully be withdrawn in a major proportion of selected pediatric liver transplantation patients during follow-up. The success rate is the highest in children with a body weight below 10 kg at the time of transplantation. Successful withdrawal improves renal function, whereas failure to withdraw is not associated with graft loss or persisting morbidity.

Adolescent↗

Buccal vs. nasogastric tube administration of tacrolimus after pediatric liver transplantation.

Tacrolimus is an important drug for immunosuppression after liver transplantation. Bioavailability of enterally administered tacrolimus is poor, and further reduced by gastric residuals or by enteral nutrition. Buccal administration might be an alternative route especially in children. Tacrolimus trough levels (TTLs) obtained after buccal administration of tacrolimus after liver transplantation have not been reported. The aim of this study was to determine whether buccal administration of tacrolimus is feasible and to compare TTLs after nasogastric tube (NGT) administration with buccal administration. TTLs after NGT or buccal administration during the first week after pediatric liver transplantation were analyzed from 28 cadaveric liver transplants in 23 pediatric recipients between June 2002 and March 2004. Each level was scored within, under or above the target range. Buccal administration was well tolerated in all patients. A total of 149 TTLs were obtained of which nine were excluded because of incomplete information on target levels. Overall 27% of TTLs was adequate. The percentage of levels under, within and above the target range were comparable in both groups (chi-square test; p = 0.64). Both groups had a decrease in percentages within the target range on day 3 and 4 after liver transplantation with a subsequent rise. Buccal tacrolimus administration is feasible. Similar TTLs are achieved compared with NGT tacrolimus administration during the first week after pediatric liver transplantation.

Administration, Buccal↗

Babies and batteries.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Electric Power Supplies↗