PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Rex C Haydon

Publications and source records attributed to Rex C Haydon.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Nuclear receptor agonists as potential differentiation therapy agents for human osteosarcoma.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate whether nuclear receptor agonists can be used as potential differentiation therapy agents for human osteosarcoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Four osteosarcoma cell lines (143B, MNNG/HOS, MG-63, and TE-85) were treated with proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)gamma agonists, troglitazone and ciglitazone, and a retinoid X receptor (RXR) ligand, 9-cis retinoic acid. The proliferation and induction of apoptosis in the treated cells were assessed, as was the induction of alkaline phosphatase, a differentiation marker of osteoblasts. RESULTS: The expression of PPARgamma was readily detected in all tested osteosarcoma lines. On treatment with the PPARgamma and RXR ligands, all four osteosarcoma lines exhibited a significantly reduced proliferation rate and cell viability. Among the four lines, 143B and MNNG/HOS were shown to be more sensitive to ligand-induced apoptosis, as demonstrated by the Crystal Violet and Hoechst staining assays. Of the three tested ligands, troglitazone was shown to be the most effective in inducing cell death, followed by 9-cis retinoic acid. Moreover, a strong synergistic effect on the induction of cell death was observed when both troglitazone and 9-cis retinoic acid or ciglitazone and 9-cis retinoic acid were administered to osteosarcoma cells. Troglitazone was shown to effectively induce alkaline phosphatase activity, a well-characterized hallmark for osteoblastic differentiation. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that PPARgamma and/or RXR ligands may be used as efficacious adjuvant therapeutic agents for primary osteosarcoma, as well as potential chemopreventive agents for preventing the recurrence and metastasis of osteosarcoma after the surgical removal of the primary tumors.

Alitretinoin↗

Gene therapy for spinal fusion.

Spinal fusion will continue to be an important part of the surgical treatment of spinal pathology for the foreseeable future. Traditional challenges to successful spinal fusion surgery include autograft donor site morbidity and pseudoarthrosis. Recent advances in the understanding of the biology of bone formation have allowed the development of therapeutic biologics. Although recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins delivered to the arthrodesis site will stimulate fusion, these proteins have been less successful in more challenging fusion situations (posterolateral), require supraphysiologic doses to promote fusion in humans, and are quite expensive. Gene therapy may represent the easiest method for the application of bone-forming biologic agents to promote spinal fusion. Both in vivo and ex vivo techniques of delivery of therapeutic genes have been used effectively to promote fusion in lower animals. Considerable research is required to identify gene therapy techniques and vectors with acceptable safety profiles and high fusion rates.

Animals↗