Elderly patients have become the leading drug consumers: it's high time to properly evaluate new drugs within the real targeted population.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Riccardo A Audisio.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: This study was designed to develop a model for predicting postoperative mortality in elderly patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. METHODS: This multicenter study was conducted by using routinely collected clinical data, assessing patients older than aged 80 years, with 30-day operative mortality as the primary end point. Data were collected from The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland database, encompassing 8,077 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients undergoing resectional surgery in 79 hospitals between April 2000 to March 2002, The Association of Coloproctology Malignant Bowel Obstruction Study, encompassing 1,046 patients with malignant bowel obstruction in 148 hospitals, between April 1998 to March 1999, and The Wales-Trent audit, encompassing 3,522 newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients, between July 1992 to June 1993. A multilevel logistic regression model was developed to adjust for case-mix and to accommodate the variability of outcomes between the three study populations. The model was internally validated using a Bayesian resampling technique and tested using measures of discrimination, calibration, and subgroup analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2,533 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria, with a 30-day mortality of 15.6 percent. Multivariate analysis identified the following independent risk factors: age (odds ratio for 85-90, 90-95, >95 vs. 80-85 = 1.1, 1.8, 2.9), American Society of Anesthesiology grade (odds ratio for Grade III, IV vs. I-II = 2.7, 6.1), operative urgency (odds ratio for emergency vs. elective = 1.9), no cancer excision vs. resection (odds ratio = 1.2), and metastatic disease (odds ratio for metastases vs. no metastases = 1.9). The model offered adequate discrimination (area under receiver operator curve = 0.732) and excellent agreement between observed and predicted outcomes during eight colorectal procedures (P = 0.885). CONCLUSIONS: The elderly colorectal cancer model can accurately estimate 30-day mortality in patients older than aged 80 years undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Because the mortality can be considerable, this may have important implications when determining management for this group of patients.
BACKGROUND: Elderly population is on rise. It is an ethical dilemma how aggressive one should be when it comes to treat cancer in elderly. Presumed fear of increased postoperative morbidity and mortality has resulted in delivery of sub-optimal cancer surgery. METHODS: In this review article we visit physiology of the aged, tools available to assess surgical risks in oncogeriatric patients, and current practice in the management of common cancers encountered in surgical oncology, with the view of increasing awareness on optimising surgical management of senior patients with cancer. A pubmed search for cancer, surgery, elderly, was carried out. RESULTS: Cancer is on rise with increasing age predominantly affecting breast, gastrointestinal tract and lung. Increasingly more surgeons are offering surgery to elderly cancer patient but selection bias is prevalent. Available data reflect short and long-term outcome of cancer surgery in elderly is not greatly different to that of younger patient. Declining physiological reserve along with inability to respond adequately to physiological stress are salient age related changes. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is not tested in surgical patient. There is need for a tool to define individualised operative risk. Preoperative assessment of cancer in elderly is designed to offer this information based on functional status of an individual utilising currently available tools of risk assessment. CONCLUSION: All elderly cancer patients should be offered optimal treatment depending on their functional status not on chronological age. Oncogeriatric patient would benefit from dedicated multidisciplinary approach. Recruitment of elderly cancer patients to more clinical trials is needed to enhance our knowledge and to offer optimum treatment to this unique subgroup.
The optimal strategy for follow-up of extremity soft tissue sarcoma patients after primary treatment with curative intent is not known. The 1592 members of the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) were sent a survey to determine their practices. Office visits and chest X-rays were the most frequently performed items for all years. Complete blood count and liver function tests were the most commonly ordered blood tests, but many respondents did not order any blood tests routinely. Imaging studies of the extremities were recommended for most patients during the first postoperative year. Postoperative surveillance strategies after sarcoma treatment vary appreciably among surgeons. Surgeon age, tumor size, tumor grade, and geographic location of the surgeon account for only a modest amount of the variation, suggesting that lack of evidence supporting any particular strategy is the factor responsible for most of the variation. Efforts to provide high-quality evidence on this topic are warranted.
A growing number of patients undergo surgical procedures with general anaesthesia soon after receiving chemotherapy; occasionally such treatment can be given during surgery. Therefore, it is worthwhile and prudent to consider the pharmacological interactions between anticancer and anaesthetic drugs. We review published data on the pharmacological interactions between antineoplastic and anaesthetic drugs, despite the fact that this specific topic is poorly represented in published work. This low coverage seems to be due more to a lack of knowledge and understanding rather than an absence of interactions between the two drug types. Since the number of individuals receiving chemotherapy in the perioperative period is rising, patients who might have potentially dangerous and unwanted effects are also due to increase in number. Thus, we should be vigilant in the careful surveillance of these interactions as well as broaden our knowledge of in-vivo and in-vitro findings and investigations. Classic cytostatic compounds and modern drugs should be extensively studied, and new anticancer therapies closely interacting with immunological responses need to be better understood, since their clinical effectiveness might be modified by anaesthetics that are currently used. More frequently, tumours are being managed in a multimodal integrated approach with medical, surgical, and radiotherapeutic aspects.
INTRODUCTION: To test the feasibility and reliability of ROLL in a district general hospital (DGH) dealing with screening detected breast lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: [(99m) Tc]-labelled colloidal human serum albumin was injected in the core of the breast lesion under ultrasound or stereotactic guidance 2-4 h prior to surgery. At operation, the radioactivity is localised using a gamma-probe. This allows optimal placement of the skin incision and subsequent WLE of the abnormal area. RESULTS: ROLL was utilised on 36 patients (median age, 61 years; range, 43-75 years); of these, 33 B5 lesions had a therapeutic one-step procedure (lumpectomy and axillary dissection) and 3 B4 patients had the lesion excised for diagnostic purposes. Localisation lasted a median of 8 min (range, 5-15 min), ROLL-guided wide tumour excision lasted 20 min (range, 15-30 min), and median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days (range, 1-3 days). Median cancer diameter was 12 mm (range, 6-40 mm). Margins were clear in 29 patients, while 7 patients with DCIS had involved margins. Median minimal clearance was 5 mm (range, < 1-10 mm). Patients had either excellent (24/36) or good (12/36) cosmetic results. CONCLUSIONS: ROLL successfully localised all lesions; this technique can be implemented in any DGH with a Nuclear Medicine Department. The learning curve is short, cost effectiveness is proven, and cosmetic results are highly rewarding. ROLL could rapidly become the standard localisation technique in the UK.
Cancer is a prevalent disease in our aging population; however, few oncologists are familiar with caring for oncogeriatric patients. Surgery is presently the treatment of choice for most solid tumors, but it is frequently delivered in a suboptimal way in this patient subsetting. Undertreatment is often justified with the concern of an unsustainable toxicity, while overtreatment can be related to the lack of knowledge in optimizing preoperative risk assessment. To draw new light on this issue, several surgeons presented their series, providing hard evidence that surgical options can be offered to the elderly with cancer, with only a limited postoperative mortality and morbidity. As it is likely that much of these data suffer from selection bias, we concentrated on Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), which can add substantial information on the functional assessment of elderly cancer patients. A validated instrument such as the CGA allows a comparison of series, predicting short-term surgical outcomes more precisely, and offers appropriate information when consenting elderly patients. Preoperative Assessment of Cancer in the Elderly is a prospective international study conceived and launched to outline the fitness of elderly surgical patients with malignant tumors. This paper reports on preliminary results and analysis from the ongoing study.
The follow-up of patients with rectal cancer after potentially curative resection has significant financial and clinical implications for patients and society. The ideal regimen for monitoring patients is unknown. We evaluated the self-reported practice patterns of a large, diverse group of experts. There is little information available describing the actual practice of clinicians who perform potentially curative surgery on rectal cancer patients and follow them after recovery. The 1795 members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons were asked, via a detailed questionnaire, how often they request 14 discrete follow-up modalities in their patients treated for cure with TNM stage I, II, or III rectal cancer over the first five post-treatment years. 566/1782 (32%) responded and 347 of the respondents (61%) provided evaluable data. Members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons typically follow their own patients postoperatively rather than sending them back to their referral source. Office visit and serum CEA level are the most frequently requested items for each of the first five postoperative years. Endoscopy and imaging tests are also used regularly. Considerable variation exists among these highly experienced, highly credentialed experts. The surveillance strategies reported here rely most heavily on relatively simple and inexpensive tests. Endoscopy is employed frequently; imaging tests are employed less often. The observed variation in the intensity of postoperative monitoring is of concern.
There is some evidence that stage and grade at diagnosis of cancer decreases with age and that the availability of data on stage and grade of cancer decreases with age. This may be because older people tend to receive less intensive investigation of cancer but this has not been confirmed. We investigated the relationship between age at diagnosis of cancer and both stage and grade at diagnosis, and the chances of data on stage or grade at diagnosis being unavailable, in people with colorectal cancer (n=12,419) and women with breast cancer (n=12,793) using 2 years of cancer registry data from the north of England. Stage and grade decreased with increasing age in colorectal cancer. Grade decreased but stage increased with increasing age in women with breast cancer. The chances of data on stage and grade at diagnosis being unavailable increased with age in all cases.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Aging remains one of the single greatest risk factors for the development of new breast carcinoma. The aim of the study was to evaluate the relation between biologic features at first diagnosis of breast carcinoma and treatment choice for postmenopausal women > or = 50 years to optimize treatment in the elderly. METHODS: The sample included 2999 consecutive postmenopausal patients referred for surgery at the European Institute of Oncology (Milan, Italy) from April 1997 to February 2002. The patients were grouped according to age: young postmenopausal (YPM; 50-64 years, n = 2052), older postmenopausal (OPM; 65-74, n = 801), and elderly postmenopausal (EPM; > or = 75, n = 146). RESULTS: EPM patients referred to surgery had larger tumors compared with YPM patients (pT4: 6.7% vs. 2.4%) as well as greater lymph node involvement (lymph node positive: 62.5% vs. 51.3%). EPM patients showed a higher degree of estrogen and progesterone receptor expression (P < 0.01), less peritumoral vascular invasion (P < 0.01), and less HER-2/neu expression (P < 0.01) than YPM patients. Comorbidities were more often recorded for elderly patients (72% EPM vs. 45% YPM; P < 0.001), did not influence surgical choices, and were similar across groups (breast conservation: 73.9%, 76.9%, and 72.9%, respectively). No systemic therapy (either chemotherapy or endocrine therapy) was recommended for 19.1% of the EPM compared with 5.4% and 4.7% of the two other groups. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of larger tumor size at presentation, older patients had tumors with more favorable biologic characteristics, when compared with younger postmenopausal patients. Reluctance to prescribe systemic treatments was due to the complexity of evaluation for these patients. Taking into account the data from the current study and given the climate of uncertainty regarding optimal treatment, the authors decided to individualize care on the basis of biologic characteristics, comorbidity, social support, functional status, and patient preferences. Trials of tailored adjuvant therapy should be a health care priority.
AIMS: To frame the attitude and perception of breast surgeons in the UK toward the increasing number of older breast cancer patients. METHODS: A 15-item questionnaire was designed to inquire on the definition of elderly, clinical management, age-related differences in surgical treatment, interaction with geriatricians, operative risk assessment, and surveyed identification/descriptive data. The questionnaire was sent to all 350 ABS associates (Association of Breast Surgery) at the British Association of Surgical Oncology (BASO). RESULTS: A 150 questionnaires were returned (compliance 43%) providing the largest sample of breast surgical specialist overview on this topic. The major part of the surveyed (44%) stated age does not stand as the most relevant factor on its own in identifying a patient as "elderly", nor in offering surgical management (98%) and in dealing with the axilla (75%). The surveyed are aware of the burden of this epidemiological problem and would rather finalise the decision-making process based on multiple factors. This is to tailor the most appropriate treatment aiming to improving quality of life (42%) and quality adjusted survival (40%). Although most breast surgeons are inclined to discuss their onco-geriatric patients with geriatricians on a regular (32%) or occasional (42%) basis, no geriatric assessment is routinely utilised (82%) and the operative risk is predicted with ASA (45%). These figures confirm the surveyed breast surgeons in the UK are not biased by an ageistic approach, and aim to achieve a global well-being to the older patients with breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This survey confirms our lack of knowledge in the management of elderly patients affected by breast cancer. Taken into account the limitations of a survey, we are pleased to confirm the performance of the largest part of breast surgeons at BASO is not biased by an ageist mentality.
The ESO Advanced Course on Cancer in the Elderly took place in Liverpool-UK, 29-30 April 2004 under the chair of Riccardo A. Audisio and Matti A. Aapro. This successful event gathered 82 participants from 17 countries; posters were displayed presenting original research data, and 19 lecturers updated the audience on the latest findings regarding basic science, prevention, early detection, diagnosis, treatment options, as well as the social impact of this frequent malignancy. This Meeting Highlights collects the panelists views; it is intended to update on the cutting edge of the present knowledge, in order to improve our understanding of malignant disease affecting senior patients, and eventually to optimise their management.
More than half of all lung cancer cases are diagnosed in patients older than 65 years of age. Risk of death after thoracotomy also increases over the age of 65. As a result, surgical intervention for lung cancer is often considered too risky in elderly patients, leaving the caregiver with a treatment dilemma when confronted with an abnormal radiographic finding. Advances in preoperative risk assessment, surgical and anesthetic techniques, radiation oncology, and locally ablative techniques have resulted in improved survival with a significant decrease in post-procedure mortality and morbidity for the aged population. On this basis, we believe treatment options for incidental pulmonary nodules found on chest roentgenograms should be discussed with patients and interventional work up pursued. It is no longer reasonable to deny elderly patients the benefits of surgical intervention simply on the basis of age. Every effort should be made to assess risk and optimize treatment for this large and growing segment of the population.
Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death and its cure depends on an adequate surgical approach. More than half of all lung cancers are diagnosed in patients aged 65 years or over. However, surgical risk increases in patients over 65 years old. Therefore, surgical procedures for lung cancer are far less frequent in elderly patients. Many clinicians avoid surgery, or minimise surgical procedures on the basis of age but recent advances in preoperative risk assessment and surgical and anaesthetic techniques have resulted in a significant decrease in operative mortality and morbidity for older patients. The treatment of lung cancer in elderly patients should no longer be based on the premise that surgery is too risky for elderly patients. Every effort should be made to assess risk and optimise treatment for this large and expanding proportion of the population.
PURPOSE: To appraise the performance of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in elderly cancer patients (> or = 65 years) and to evaluate whether it could add further information with respect to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 363 elderly cancer patients (195 males, 168 females; median age, 72 years) with solid (n = 271) or hematologic (n = 92) tumors. In addition to PS, their physical function was assessed by means of the activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales. Comorbidities were categorized according to Satariano's index. The association between PS, comorbidity, and the items of the CGA was assessed by means of logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: These 363 elderly cancer patients had a good functional and mental status: 74% had a good PS (ie, lower than 2), 86% were ADL-independent, and 52% were IADL-independent. Forty-one percent of patients had one or more comorbid conditions. Of the patients with a good PS, 13.0% had two or more comorbidities; 9.3% and 37.7% had ADL or IADL limitations, respectively. By multivariate analysis, elderly cancer patients who were ADL-dependent or IADL-dependent had a nearly two-fold higher probability of having an elevated Satariano's index than independent patients. A strong association emerged between PS and CGA, with a nearly five-fold increased probability of having a poor PS (ie, > or = 2) recorded in patients dependent for ADL or IADL. CONCLUSION: The CGA adds substantial information on the functional assessment of elderly cancer patients, including patients with a good PS. The role of PS as unique marker of functional status needs to be reappraised among elderly cancer patients.