PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard A Harshman

Publications and source records attributed to Richard A Harshman.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Noise reduction in BOLD-based fMRI using component analysis.

Principle Component Analysis (PCA) and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) were used to decompose the fMRI time series signal and separate the BOLD signal change from the structured and random noise. Rather than using component analysis to identify spatial patterns of activation and noise, the approach we took was to identify PCA or ICA components contributing primarily to the noise. These noise components were identified using an unsupervised algorithm that examines the Fourier decomposition of each component time series. Noise components were then removed before subsequent reconstruction of the time series data. The BOLD contrast sensitivity (CS(BOLD)), defined as the ability to detect a BOLD signal change in the presence of physiological and scanner noise, was then calculated for all voxels. There was an increase in CS(BOLD) values of activated voxels after noise reduction as a result of decreased image-to-image variability in the time series of each voxel. A comparison of PCA and ICA revealed significant differences in their treatment of both structured and random noise. ICA proved better for isolation and removal of structured noise, while PCA was superior for isolation and removal of random noise. This provides a framework for using and evaluating component analysis techniques for noise reduction in fMRI.

Adult↗

What accounts for the appeal of complementary/alternative medicine, and what makes complementary/ alternative medicine "alternative"?

The goal of this study was to elucidate the basis for the appeal of complementary/alternative medicine (CAM) and the basis upon which people distinguish between CAM and conventional medicine. Undergraduates (N = 173) rated 19 approaches to the treatment of chronic back pain on 16 rating scales. Data were analyzed via 3-mode factor analysis, which extracted conceptual dimensions common to both the scales and the treatments. A 5-factor solution was judged togive the best description of the raters'perceptions. One of these 5 factors clearly reflected the distinction between conventional versus CAM approaches, and a 2nd factor clearly referred to treatment appeal. The other 3 factors were invasiveness, health care professional versus patient effort, and "druglikeness." To the extent that treatment was seen as a CAM treatment (as opposed to a conventional treatment), it was seen to be more appealing, less invasive, and less druglike. Simple and partial correlations of the dimension weights indicated that both the appeal of CAM and the distinction between CAM and conventional medicine were largely driven by the view that CAM is less invasive than conventional medicine.

Adolescent↗