PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard A Levis

Publications and source records attributed to Richard A Levis.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Properties of single voltage-gated proton channels in human eosinophils estimated by noise analysis and by direct measurement.

Voltage-gated proton channels were studied under voltage clamp in excised, inside-out patches of human eosinophils, at various pHi with pHo 7.5 or 6.5 pipette solutions. H+ current fluctuations were observed consistently when the membrane was depolarized to voltages that activated H+ current. At pHi < or = 5.5 the variance increased nonmonotonically with depolarization to a maximum near the midpoint of the H+ conductance-voltage relationship, gH-V, and then decreased, supporting the idea that the noise is generated by H+ channel gating. Power spectral analysis indicated Lorentzian and 1/f components, both related to H+ currents. Unitary H+ current amplitude was estimated from stationary or quasi-stationary variance, sigmaH2. We analyze sigmaH2 data obtained at various voltages on a linearized plot that provides estimates of both unitary conductance and the number of channels in the patch, without requiring knowledge of open probability. The unitary conductance averaged 38 fS at pHi 6.5, and increased nearly fourfold to 140 fS at pHi 5.5, but was independent of pHo. In contrast, the macroscopic gH was only 1.8-fold larger at pHi 5.5 than at pHi 6.5. The maximum H+ channel open probability during large depolarizations was 0.75 at pHi 6.5 and 0.95 at pHi 5.5. Because the unitary conductance increases at lower pHi more than the macroscopic gH, the number of functional channels must decrease. Single H+ channel currents were too small to record directly at physiological pH, but at pHi < or = 5.5 near Vthreshold (the voltage at which gH turns on), single channel-like current events were observed with amplitudes 7-16 fA.

Adult↗

Single-cell electroporation.

Using modified patch-clamp methodology, we demonstrated that it is possible to insert genes or other compounds routinely into single cells by electroporation. When the cell is indented by a small-tipped microelectrode, a voltage of 10 V or less in the pipette is divided by the pipette resistance and the series resistance of the cleft between the pipette tip and the cell surface. The voltage at the cell membrane can be high enough to cause localized dielectric breakdown of the membrane and create pores that allow compounds in the pipette to enter the cell. Rectangular pulses from 20 micros to more than 300 ms are effective, as are frequencies from DC to 5 kHz. The most significant parameter was the total time for which the voltage was applied. Pipette voltages of 2-10 V were required, with larger genes requiring larger voltages. With optimal parameters, transfection rates in excess of 80% were also possible routinely. This approach offers an effective alternative to intracellular pressure injection and iontophoresis for placing genes, drugs, and other compounds in cells. Because of the small size of the electrode tips, substances can be inserted in cells from almost any location on their surfaces. In addition, the small tips electroporated only a limited area and so did little cell damage.

Contrast Media↗