Re, The behavioral management of pain: a critique of a critique.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Richard A Sternbach.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A national survey of pain in the United States has been conducted, using a sample of 1254 persons 18 years of age or more, statistically constructed so as to permit projections to be made to the entire adult population of 174 million with a predicted accuracy of +/- 2-3%. Pain prevalence and severity, and its impact on work and other activities were obtained and correlated with demographic variables. This paper reports the portion of the study examining the association of pain with stress, daily hassles, measures of health locus of control, and various health habits. There was a very strong association between stress and pain and hassles and pain. The greater the stress and hassles, the greater the incidence, frequency and severity of all pains reported. Those with high internal health locus of control are more likely to have healthy behavior, are less likely to have all kinds of pain, and have less severe pain. Stress was voluntarily mentioned by respondents as a major cause of pain in headaches, backaches, stomach pains, and menstrual pains, but not for muscle, joint or dental pains.
Common criticisms of behavioral treatment programs for chronic pain are summarized. Some criticisms are based on conceptual misunderstandings; therefore, basic concepts and goals of behavioral programs are presented. Other criticisms question the effectiveness of these programs; therefore, the role of social reinforcers in maintaining or reducing pain behaviors is reviewed. The failure to isolate specific treatment variables is alleged; this is acknowledged, along with the practical and ethical questions making this virtually impossible. Finally we describe the need to change the thinking about 'pain' from the pathological or disease model, appropriate to acute pain, to a learning model when discussing the excess disability and suffering of chronic pain patients.
Patients with chronic pain in one limb, who experienced pain reduction with transcutaneous neurostimulation, were examined for sensory perception in that limb before and during electrical analgesia. Contralateral limbs and normal subjects served as controls. Sensory stimuli were quantified, a range of stimuli were presented and data were analyzed according to sensory decision theory. Results showed that, compared to controls, painful limbs show considerable impairment in sensory sensitivity. With transcutaneous neurostimulation, however, sensitivity is improved towards normal, whereas electrical stimulation slightly impairs perception in normal limbs. These results suggest that electrical analgesia involves both peripheral small-fiber blockade and large-fiber stimulation; the latter is more noticeable in the normal limb, but the former effect is predominant when pain reduction occurs in a painful limb.
Two-year and 3-year follow-up analyses show that those who did not receive surgery for pain relief did as well as those who did receive such surgery during their stay, both groups showing consistently lower pain levels and analgesic intake than on admission, while activity levels progressively increased. The surgical patients were more likely to be readmitted for their pain problem than were the others, whereas the others were more likely to be readmitted for other medical problems.
Twenty-four chronic pain patients were given, on each of 4 successive days, oral doses of 60 mg morphine, 60 mg codeine, 600 mg aspirin and placebo, using a double-blind counterbalanced design. Two hours after ingestion, subjective pain estimates and tourniquet pain scores were obtained. Variability of the tourniquet pain scores was too great for differences in response to the analgesics to be significant. However, differences in pain estimates were also too small to discriminate among the drugs, and the lack of sensitivity may be a function of pain chronicity. The tourniquet techniques will continue to be useful until there is a purely objective measure of the severity of clinical pain.
One year follow-up data are analyzed for the effects of using transcutaneous neurostimulators on patients with chronic benign pain. Those who have successful surgery for pain relief have lower pain and analgesic intake levels than those who supplement their surgery with neurostimulation. Those who do not receive surgery for pain but use neurostimulators have greatly increased activity levels than those who do not use these devices. The neurostimulators lower the clinical pain level component of the tourniquet test score for non-surgery patients to a degree comparable to that of patients with successful surgical outcomes, but maximum pain tolerance is not significantly altered. This supports the hypothesis that the analgesic effect is primarily a peripheral one.
Of 113 patients treated in a 2-year period, for whom complete data were available, 29 who received surgery for pain relief were compared with 84 who did not, both groups receiving psychological treatment and rehabilitation. Using an analysis of covariance to eliminate pre-treatment differences, the surgery patients showed significantly greater reductions on the MMPI Hysteria and Hypomania scales, and on the invalidism scale of a Health Index, and this was associated with a significantly greater reduction of pain. These differences obtained despite a greater increase in activity levels by the non-surgery patients at the time of testing. The results support the hypothesis that the neuroticism associated with chronic pain is the result of it, and may be reversible when the pain is reduced or abolished.