PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard Bonneau

Publications and source records attributed to Richard Bonneau.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Distinct cellular phenotypes of language and executive decline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Cognitive manifestations, including impairments in language and executive functions, are seen in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We mapped prefrontal cortex regions from ALS patients by integrating spatial and single-nucleus transcriptomics in a cognitively stratified patient cohort. We uncover that cognitive impairment in ALS is associated with distinct patterns of neuronal dysfunction and glial-vascular dysregulation that vary by region and cognitive subtype. Executive dysfunction is linked to reduced mitochondrial and synaptic activity in deep-layer dorsolateral prefrontal cortex neurons, whereas language-related deficits track with a diffuse pan-regional response involving glial and vascular abnormalities. Our analyses, validated by multiplexed imaging, further identify signatures in the prefrontal cortex that span both motor and cognitive phenotypes, including a multicellular gliosis response. The findings reveal that clinical heterogeneity in ALS is driven by phenotype-specific cellular interactions in motor and non-motor regions of the brain.

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis↗

An improved protein decoy set for testing energy functions for protein structure prediction.

We have improved the original Rosetta centroid/backbone decoy set by increasing the number of proteins and frequency of near native models and by building on sidechains and minimizing clashes. The new set consists of 1,400 model structures for 78 different and diverse protein targets and provides a challenging set for the testing and evaluation of scoring functions. We evaluated the extent to which a variety of all-atom energy functions could identify the native and close-to-native structures in the new decoy sets. Of various implicit solvent models, we found that a solvent-accessible surface area-based solvation provided the best enrichment and discrimination of close-to-native decoys. The combination of this solvation treatment with Lennard Jones terms and the original Rosetta energy provided better enrichment and discrimination than any of the individual terms. The results also highlight the differences in accuracy of NMR and X-ray crystal structures: a large energy gap was observed between native and non-native conformations for X-ray structures but not for NMR structures.

Algorithms↗

Ab initio methods.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Computational Biology↗

De novo prediction of three-dimensional structures for major protein families.

We use the Rosetta de novo structure prediction method to produce three-dimensional structure models for all Pfam-A sequence families with average length under 150 residues and no link to any protein of known structure. To estimate the reliability of the predictions, the method was calibrated on 131 proteins of known structure. For approximately 60% of the proteins one of the top five models was correctly predicted for 50 or more residues, and for approximately 35%, the correct SCOP superfamily was identified in a structure-based search of the Protein Data Bank using one of the models. This performance is consistent with results from the fourth critical assessment of structure prediction (CASP4). Correct and incorrect predictions could be partially distinguished using a confidence function based on a combination of simulation convergence, protein length and the similarity of a given structure prediction to known protein structures. While the limited accuracy and reliability of the method precludes definitive conclusions, the Pfam models provide the only tertiary structure information available for the 12% of publicly available sequences represented by these large protein families.

Calibration↗

Distributions of beta sheets in proteins with application to structure prediction.

We recently developed the Rosetta algorithm for ab initio protein structure prediction, which generates protein structures from fragment libraries using simulated annealing. The scoring function in this algorithm favors the assembly of strands into sheets. However, it does not discriminate between different sheet motifs. After generating many structures using Rosetta, we found that the folding algorithm predominantly generates very local structures. We surveyed the distribution of beta-sheet motifs with two edge strands (open sheets) in a large set of non-homologous proteins. We investigated how much of that distribution can be accounted for by rules previously published in the literature, and developed a filter and a scoring method that enables us to improve protein structure prediction for beta-sheet proteins. Proteins 2002;48:85-97.

Algorithms↗

Contact order and ab initio protein structure prediction.

Although much of the motivation for experimental studies of protein folding is to obtain insights for improving protein structure prediction, there has been relatively little connection between experimental protein folding studies and computational structural prediction work in recent years. In the present study, we show that the relationship between protein folding rates and the contact order (CO) of the native structure has implications for ab initio protein structure prediction. Rosetta ab initio folding simulations produce a dearth of high CO structures and an excess of low CO structures, as expected if the computer simulations mimic to some extent the actual folding process. Consistent with this, the majority of failures in ab initio prediction in the CASP4 (critical assessment of structure prediction) experiment involved high CO structures likely to fold much more slowly than the lower CO structures for which reasonable predictions were made. This bias against high CO structures can be partially alleviated by performing large numbers of additional simulations, selecting out the higher CO structures, and eliminating the very low CO structures; this leads to a modest improvement in prediction quality. More significant improvements in predictions for proteins with complex topologies may be possible following significant increases in high-performance computing power, which will be required for thoroughly sampling high CO conformations (high CO proteins can take six orders of magnitude longer to fold than low CO proteins). Importantly for such a strategy, simulations performed for high CO structures converge much less strongly than those for low CO structures, and hence, lack of simulation convergence can indicate the need for improved sampling of high CO conformations. The parallels between Rosetta simulations and folding in vivo may extend to misfolding: The very low CO structures that accumulate in Rosetta simulations consist primarily of local up-down beta-sheets that may resemble precursors to amyloid formation.

Algorithms↗