PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard G Fiscella

Publications and source records attributed to Richard G Fiscella.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Measurement of persistence and adherence to regimens of IOP-lowering glaucoma medications using pharmacy claims data.

PURPOSE: Determine persistence and adherence of glaucoma patients to therapeutic regimens of prostaglandin/prostamide-class IOP-lowering medications. DESIGN: Retrospective, population-based study. METHODS: Glaucoma patients in the IMS Health LifeLink database with a pharmacy claim for latanoprost (n = 1567), travoprost (n = 381), or bimatoprost (n = 476) between September, 2001 and March, 2002 who had no claims for IOP-lowering medication in the previous 180 days, and who were persistent during the first 90 days of therapy. Values reported in the quantity dispensed and days supply fields of the database were used in an algorithm that corrected anomalous data and adjusted days supply to calculate the main outcome measures, persistence, and adherence to therapy. RESULTS: The percentage of patients persistent for the 12-month observation period was 69.4% (1087/1567) for those prescribed latanoprost, 70.6% (269/381) for those prescribed travoprost, and 68.1% (324/467) for those prescribed bimatoprost. Mean adherence for patients prescribed latanoprost was 75.4% of the year, for those prescribed travoprost, 77.1% of the year, and for those prescribed bimatoprost, 78.2% of the year. The mean number of days adherent for bimatoprost-treated patients (291.2 days) was significantly greater than for latanoprost-treated patients (281.0 days), and not remarkably different from travoprost-treated patients (287.0 days). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, patients in this study who were taking IOP-lowering prostaglandin/prostamide medications had a mean adherence rate of 76% on average, suggesting that opportunities remain for improvement of adherence to therapeutic regimens for glaucoma treatment with prostamides and prostaglandins.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2005

A retrospective study of endophtalmitis rates comparing quinolone antibiotics.

PURPOSE: To compare endophthalmitis rates between topical quinolone antibiotics over a four-year period in a university setting. DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional (prevalence) study. METHODS STUDY POPULATION: Nine thousand seventy-nine patients who underwent a phacoemulsification procedure at a University Eye Center. INTERVENTIONS: The following interventions were conducted: use of a nosocomial infectious reporting database retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data to establish endophthalmitis rates; prevalence analysis of postoperative quinolone antibiotics; analysis of endophthalmitis rate vs postoperative quinolone prescribed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. RESULTS: During a four-year period involving 9079 phacoemulsification procedures, 26 cases of bacterial postoperative endophthalmitis were reported (rate = 0.286%). Eight of the 26 cases were considered complicated; 18 cases were uncomplicated. Among cases performed during this period, postoperative prescription volumes for ciprofloxacin (Ciloxan, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fortworth, Texas) and ofloxacin (Ocuflox, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, California) antibiotic drops were nearly identical, with 4538 patients receiving ciprofloxacin (49.98%) and 4541 patients receiving ofloxacin (50.02%). There were 22 endophthalmitis patients (85%) who had used topical ciprofloxacin and 4 patients (15%) who had used topical ofloxacin postoperatively. The difference in infectious rates between antibiotics was highly significant (P < .00026). For uncomplicated cases, 14 patients received ciprofloxacin and 4 patients received ofloxacin. This difference was also significant (P < .015). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties exist among quinolone antibiotics, which may affect endophthalmitis incidence following cataract surgery.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2004

Aqueous and vitreous penetration of linezolid (Zyvox) after oral administration.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the penetration of linezolid, a synthetic oxazolidinone antibiotic, into the aqueous and vitreous humor after oral administration. DESIGN: Noncomparative interventional, prospective case series study, randomized into group 1 (dose, one 600-mg tablet) or group 2 (2 doses of 600 mg given 12 hours apart). PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy between March 2001 and August 2002 at the University of Illinois at Chicago Eye Center who had not had prior vitrectomy surgery. METHODS: Aqueous, vitreous, and plasma samples were obtained and analyzed from 29 patients after oral administration of 1 dose (group 1A, 13 patients [13 eyes] sampled less than 2 hours after administration; group 1B, 9 patients [9 eyes] sampled more than 2 hours after administration) or 2 doses 12 hours apart (group 2, 7 patients [7 eyes]) before surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Aqueous, vitreous, and plasma concentrations of linezolid (micrograms per milliliter). RESULTS: Group 1A achieved mean aqueous, vitreous, and plasma levels of 0.77+/-0.6 microg/mL, 0.3+/-0.3 microg/mL, and 5.0+/-3.3 microg/mL, respectively. Group 1B achieved mean aqueous, vitreous, and plasma levels of 3.8+/-1.2 microg/mL, 2.3+/-1.4 microg/mL, and 7.6+/-2.7 microg/mL, respectively. Group 2 achieved mean aqueous, vitreous, and plasma levels of 6.6+/-2.7 microg/mL, 5.7+/-2.7 microg/mL, and 10.3+/-4.1 microg/mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mean inhibitory aqueous and vitreous minimum inhibitory concentrations for 90% of isolates (MIC(90)) were achieved against all gram-positive bacteria, including vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and streptococcal species after 2 doses given 12 hours apart. Mean MIC(90) were achieved for many gram-positive pathogens after only one dose in many patients after approximately 4 hours.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2004

Safety of verteporfin for treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes associated with age-related macular degeneration.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a novel treatment entity that exploits the photophysical properties of various photosensitive chemical entities which, upon light activation, results in targeted photooxidation and subsequent tissue destruction. The antiangiogenic properties of PDT have been adapted for treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes due to disease states such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Historically, PDT has been limited by a lack of suitable photosensitive dyes. However, agents such as verteporfin, a second-generation benzoporphyrin derivative, appear to be free from the extensive phototoxicity that limited the success of previous agents. Verteporfin has a high affinity for choroidal neovascular membranes, typically found with exudative AMD, and upon photoactivation results in targeted microvascular damage and thrombus formation with resultant vessel occlusion. Scrutiny of diagnostic indicators for verteporfin administration, including critical angiographic evaluation of lesion size and visual acuity, is essential to treatment success. Large lesions with relatively good visual acuity (20/50 or better) may be at particular risk for marked vision loss following verteporfin administration. Lesion composition also appears to influence visual outcome with verteporfin use. The safety of verteporfin is directly dependent upon the appropriate integration of dosage, infusion and light activation required for a suitable pharmacotherapeutic outcome. When used appropriately, and with adequate patient education regarding photosensitivity, the risk-benefit of verteporfin for the medical treatment of neovascular AMD is favourable.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Medical therapy cost considerations for glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the calculated daily patient cost (cost minimization) of medical glaucoma therapy and review cost trends. DESIGN: Experimental, controlled, prospective study. METHODS: The actual volume of various glaucoma medications or glaucoma medications with redesigned bottles was determined for most commercially available sizes of the tested products. The drops per milliliter based on the actual volume and the daily costs of the dosage schedules recommended by the manufacturers were compared. The cost of each bottle of medication was determined from the average wholesale price (AWP) in the United States. A comparison to 1999 prices where applicable will be analyzed to review costing trends. RESULTS: The generic timolol products (range, US dollars 0.38-US dollars 0.46 per day) were similar on a cost per day basis vs Betimol (Santen, Napa Valley, California, USA), Optipranolol (Bausch and Lomb Pharmaceuticals, Tampa, Florida, USA) and Timoptic (Merck, West Point, Pennsylvania, USA). Their percentage cost increase ranged from 5% to 22% since 1999, except for generic timolol XE gel-forming solution (48%). Betagan (Allergan, Irvine, California, USA), Betoptic S (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, Texas, USA), and Ocupress (Novartis, Duluth, Georgia, USA) ranged from US dollars 0.88 to US dollars 1.11 per day, and their percentage cost increase ranged from 33% to 53%. Some brand-only products have raised their AWPs a greater percentage, including Betoptic S (37%), Iopidine (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) (50%), Ocupress (Novartis Ophthalmics, Duluth, Georgia, USA) (53%), and Pilopine gel (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) (32%). The mean cost per day for the topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitors Azopt (Alcon Laboratories; US dollars 1.33 per day) and Trusopt (Merck; US dollars 1.05 per day) differed from 1999 when prices were almost identical. Cosopt (Merck; timolol 0.5% plus dorzolamide 2%, US dollars 1.04 per day) was less than the cost of separate bottles of a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor and a beta-blocker. The selective alpha-2 agonist brimonidine 0.15% with Purite (Alphagan-P, Allergan, 5 ml) twice daily was US dollars 1.29 per day. The prostaglandin analogs were comparably priced with Lumigan (Allergan) US dollars 0.95 per day, Xalatan (Pharmacia and Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA) US dollars 1.25 per day, Travatan (Alcon Laboratories) US dollars 1.01 per day, and Rescula (Novartis) US dollars 0.90 per day. CONCLUSIONS: All generic timolol, Betimol, Optipranolol, Timoptic, and Timoptic XE (Merck) ranged from US dollars 0.38 to US dollars 0.50 per day. Other beta-blocker products were about twice as costly, ranging from US dollars 0.88 to US dollars 1.11 per day. Cosopt (US dollars 1.05 per day) was less costly than separate bottles of a topical beta-blocker and a topical carbonic anhydrase inhibitor dosed three times daily or twice daily. The prostaglandin analogs ranged from US dollars 0.90 per day (Rescula) to US dollars 1.25 per day (Xalatan). Newer glaucoma medications exhibit similar costs per day in many cases, compared with more traditional medications, especially with greater price increases in older brand-only products.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2002

Emerging perspectives in glaucoma: optimizing 24-hour control of intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE: To explore recent studies and clinical experience involving the importance of 24-hour control of intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with glaucoma. METHODS: Roundtable discussion. RESULTS: During the discussion, the following concepts were identified: 1. Although the effect of IOP is continuous, IOP is infrequently measured in clinical practice. 2. Within an individual patient, measurements of IOP have considerable variability throughout 24 hours. 3. Recent studies have shown that healthy subjects and glaucoma patients may experience their highest IOP at night once they have lain down to sleep. 4. Low blood pressure levels related to an individual's circadian rhythm can occur simultaneous with high IOPs at night, reducing blood flow to the optic nerve head below critical levels and thus resulting in optic nerve damage. 5. Glaucoma medications that can maximally reduce IOP over 24 hours and minimally influence blood pressure should have theoretical and practical advantages for glaucoma management. CONCLUSIONS: The new knowledge about peak night-time IOPs is changing how physicians manage their patients in terms of drug selection and targeted IOP levels aimed at halting progression of glaucomatous optic nerve damage and visual field loss. Physicians are also taking into consideration the troublesome relationship between lowered systemic blood pressure and elevated IOP during the nighttime period.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2002

Glaucoma medications: a drug-therapy review.

Today, clinicians have unprecedented versatility in the treatment of glaucoma. Early detection, prevention, and control are promises inherent in the expansion of the pharmacological glaucoma armamentarium. Choosing the optimal regimen hinges on knowledge about the capabilities and the limitations of currently available medications.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗