PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard G Forbes

Publications and source records attributed to Richard G Forbes.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Field electron and ion emission from charged surfaces: a strategic historical review of theoretical concepts.

The field-electron (FE) and field-ion techniques directly observe and measure atomic-level surface processes that occur in very high electric fields. In theoretical terms, the high fields put large additional terms into Hamiltonians and free energies, and significantly modify many aspects of the surface physics and chemistry, as compared with the field-free situation. This paper presents a strategic review of the fundamental science of some of these high-field surface effects and processes, as developed in the context of the field electron and ion emission techniques. It outlines the main theoretical concepts developed, notes some twists of scientific history, and suggests useful contributions made to mainstream science. Topics covered are basic aspects of FE emission, surface field ionisation, localised field adsorption, charged surfaces theory, field-ion image contrast theory and associated imaging-gas kinetics, field evaporation, and aspects of the thermodynamics of charged surfaces. Despite many years of effort, important aspects of the theory remain incomplete. Some theoretical challenges are noted.

Journal Article↗

Some comments on models for field enhancement.

To estimate the apex field-enhancement factor gamma(a)associated with a pointed protrusion on a flat planar surface, the simple physical models of a 'floating sphere at emitter-plane potential' and a 'hemisphere on a post' are often discussed. The corresponding mathematical expressions have the form: gamma(a)=m+h/rho, where rho is the sphere or hemisphere radius, h is its 'height above the emitter plane', and m is a constant variously taken as 0, 2 or 3. Recent numerical simulations for the 'hemisphere on a post' model, reported elsewhere by two of us (CJE and GV) and by Kokkaris, Modinos and Xanthakis, have shown that all of these simple formulae significantly overpredict gamma(a) if h/rho is large. This article first reexamines the basis of these simple formulae and confirms that they are less secure than is sometimes thought. The formulae reported elsewhere as fits to the numerical results are then quoted and compared with the simple formulae, and with the known exact analytical result for the 'hemi-ellipsoid on a plane' model. Discrepancies can be rationalised. Some general conclusions are drawn.

Journal Article↗