PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Richard Saffery

Publications and source records attributed to Richard Saffery.

8 recordsLinked to original sources

Engineering chromosomes for delivery of therapeutic genes.

The ability to create fully functional human chromosome vectors represents a potentially exciting gene-delivery system for the correction of human genetic disorders with several advantages over viral delivery systems. However, for the full potential of chromosome-based gene-delivery vectors to be realized, several key obstacles must be overcome. Methods must be developed to insert therapeutic genes reliably and efficiently and to enable the stable transfer of the resulting chromosomal vectors to different therapeutic cell types. Research to achieve these outcomes continues to encounter major challenges; however recent developments have reiterated the potential of chromosome-based vectors for therapeutic gene delivery. Here we review the different strategies under development and discuss the advantages and problems associated with each.

Animals↗

Analysis of mitotic and expression properties of human neocentromere-based transchromosomes in mice.

Human neocentromeres are functional centromeres that are devoid of the typical human centromeric alpha-satellite DNA. We have transferred a 60-Mb chromosome 10-derived neocentric marker chromosome, mardel(10), and its truncated 3.5-Mb derivative, NC-MiC1, into mouse embryonic stem cell and have demonstrated a relatively high structural and mitotic stability of the transchromosomes in a heterologous genetic background. We have also produced chimeric mice carrying mardel(10) or NC-MiC1. Both transchromosomes were detected as intact episomal entities in a variety of adult chimeric mouse tissues including hemopoietic stem cells. Genes residing on these transchromosomes were expressed in the different tissues tested. Meiotic transmission of both transchromosomes in the chimeric mice was evident from the detection of DNA from these chromosomes in sperm samples. In particular, germ line transmission of NC-MiC1 was demonstrated in the F1 embryos of the chimeric mice. Variable (low in mardel(10)- or NC-MiC1-containing embryonic stem cells and chimeric mouse tissues and relatively high in NC-MiC1-containing F1 embryos) levels of missegregation of these transchromosomes were detected, suggesting that they are not optimally predisposed to full mitotic regulation in the mouse background, particularly during early embryogenesis. These results provide promising data in support of the potential use of neocentromere-based human marker chromosomes and minichromosomes as a tool for the study of centromere, neocentromere, and chromosome biology and for gene therapy studies in a mouse model system. They also highlight the need to further understand and overcome the factors that are responsible for the definable rates of instability of these transchromosomes in a mouse model.

Animals↗

Effects of scaffold/matrix alteration on centromeric function and gene expression.

We have previously described a 3.5-Mb domain of enhance scaffold/matrix attachment region (S/MAR) at a human neocentromere, and normal expression of underlying genes within this region. We also reported that partial inhibition of histone deacetylation using 33 nmtrichostatin A (TSA) resulted in a shift in the position of the CENP-A-binding domain within the neocentromere, with no noticeable effects on mitotic segregation function. In this study, 33 nM TSA caused a reduction in the size of the enhanced S/MAR domain of one-half to 1.7 Mb. Treatment with a DNA-intercalating drug distamycin A (DST) at 75 microg/ml resulted in a size reduction of the enhanced S/MAR domain at the neocentromere of two-thirds to 1.2 Mb, and that of the CENP-A-binding domain of 40%, from 330 to 196 kb, with no significant shift in the position of the latter domain. Other DST effects include mitotic chromosomal missegregation, reduction in the levels of Topo IIalpha, CENP-A, CENP-C, and HP1alpha, and an increase in mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. TSA or DST treatment similarly resulted in a significant reduction, by approximately 20 and 50%, respectively, in the size of the enhanced S/MAR domain at the alpha-satellite DNA of a native chromosome 10 centromere. Transcriptional competence within the neocentromere is overall not noticeably altered by either TSA or DST treatment, as is evident from the absence of any significant increase or decrease in the expression levels of 47 underlying genes tested. These results suggest that a substantial contraction of the S/MAR domain may not be deleterious to centromere function, that disruption of the S/MAR domain directly affects the binding properties of a host of scaffold/matrix and centromeric/pericentric proteins, and that the overall competence and regulation of transcription at the neocentromeric chromatin is similar to those found at the corresponding normal genomic sites.

Animals↗

Chromosome size and origin as determinants of the level of CENP-A incorporation into human centromeres.

We have expressed an EGFP-CENP-A fusion protein in human cells in order to quantitate the level of CENP-A incorporated into normal and variant human centromeres. The results revealed a 3.2-fold difference in the level of CENP-A incorporation into alpha-satellite repeat DNA-based centromeres, with the Y centromere showing the lowest level of all normal human chromosomes. Identification of individual chromosomes revealed a statistically significant, though not absolute, correlation between chromosome size and CENP-A incorporation. Analysis of three independent neocentromeres revealed a significantly reduced level of CENP-A compared to normal centromeres. Truncation of a neocentric marker chromosome to produce a minichromosome further reduced CENP-A levels, indicating a remodelling of centromeric chromatin. These results suggest a role for increased CENP-A incorporation in the faithful segregation of larger chromosomes and support a model of centromere evolution in which neocentromeres represent ancestral centromeres that, through adaptive evolution, acquire satellite repeats to facilitate the incorporation of higher numbers of CENP-A containing nucleosomes, thereby facilitating the assembly of larger kinetochore structures.

Autoantigens↗

Transcription within a functional human centromere.

Recent data in yeast and Drosophila suggest a domain-like centromere structure with a modified chromatin core and flanking regions of heterochromatin. We have analyzed a functional human centromere and defined a region of increased chromosome scaffold/matrix attachment that overlaps three other distinct and nonoverlapping domains for constitutive centromere proteins CENP-A and CENP-H, and heterochromatin protein HP1. Transcriptional competency is intact throughout the S/MAR-enriched region and within the CENP-A- and CENP-H-associated chromatin. These results provide insights into the relationship between centromeric chromatin and transcriptional competency in vivo, highlighting the permissibility of transcription within the constitutively modified, nonheterochromatic chromatin of a functional eukaryotic centromere.

Animals↗

17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type XI localizes to human steroidogenic cells.

We searched expressed sequence tag databases with conserved domains of the short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase superfamily and identified another isoform of 17 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, 17 beta HSDXI. This enzyme converts 5 alpha-androstane-3 alpha, 17 beta-diol to androsterone. The substrate has been implicated in supporting gestation and modulating gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor activity. 17 beta HSDXI is colinear with human retinal short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase retSDR2, a protein with no known biological activity (accession no. AAF06939). Of the proteins with known function, 17 beta HSDXI is most closely related to the retinol-metabolizing enzyme retSDR1, with which it has 30% identity. There is a polymorphic stretch of 15 adenosines in the 5' untranslated region of the cDNA sequence and a silent polymorphism at C719T. A 17 beta HSDXI construct with a stretch of 20 adenosines was found to produce significantly more enzyme activity than constructs containing 15 or less adenosines (43% vs. 26%, P < 0.005). The C719T polymorphism is present in 15% of genomic DNA samples. Northern blot analysis showed high levels of 17 beta HSDXI expression in the pancreas, kidney, liver, lung, adrenal, ovary, and heart. Immunohistochemical staining for 17 beta HSDXI is strong in steroidogenic cells such as syncytiotrophoblasts, sebaceous gland, Leydig cells, and granulosa cells of the dominant follicle and corpus luteum. In the adrenal 17 beta HSDXI, staining colocalized with the distribution of 17 alpha-hydroxylase but was stronger in the mid to outer cortex. 17 beta HSDXI was also found in the fetus and increased after birth. Liver parenchymal cells and epithelium of the endometrium and small intestine also stained. Regulation studies in mouse Y1 cells showed that cAMP down-regulates 17 beta HSDXI enzymatic activity (40% vs. 32%, P < 0.05) and reduces gene expression to undetectable levels. All-trans-retinoic acid did not affect 17 beta HSDXI expression or activity, but addition of the retinoid together with cAMP significantly decreased activity over cAMP alone (32% vs. 23%, P < 0.05). Cloning and sequencing of the 17 beta HSDXI promoter identified the potential nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor-1 half-site TCCAAGGCCGG, and a cluster of three other potential steroidogenic factor-1 half-sites were found in the distal part of intron 1. Collectively, these results suggest a role for 17 beta HSDXI in androgen metabolism during steroidogenesis and a possible role in nonsteroidogenic tissues including paracrine modulation of 5 alpha-androstane-3 alpha, 17 beta-diol levels. 17 beta HSDXI could act by metabolizing compounds that stimulate steroid synthesis and/or by generating metabolites that inhibit it.

17-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenases↗

Centromere proteins Cenpa, Cenpb, and Bub3 interact with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 protein and are poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) is activated by DNA strand breaks during cellular genotoxic stress response and catalyzes poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of acceptor proteins. These acceptor proteins include those involved in modulation of chromatin structure, DNA synthesis, DNA repair, transcription, and cell cycle control. Thus, PARP-1 is believed to play a pivotal role in maintaining genome integrity through modulation of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. We previously described the association of PARP-1 with normal mammalian centromeres and human neocentromeres by affinity purification and immunofluorescence. Here we investigated the interaction of this protein with, and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation of, three constitutive centromere proteins, Cenpa, Cenpb, and Cenpc, and a spindle checkpoint protein, Bub3. Immunoprecipitation and Western blot analyses demonstrate that Cenpa, Cenpb, and Bub3, but not Cenpc, interacted with PARP-1, and are poly(ADP-ribosyl)ated following induction of DNA damage. The results suggest a role of PARP-1 in centromere assembly/disassembly and checkpoint control. Demonstration of PARP-1-binding and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation in three of the four proteins tested further suggests that many more centromere proteins may behave similarly and implicates PARP-1 as an important regulator of diverse centromere function.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Strategies for engineering human chromosomes with therapeutic potential.

Human engineered chromosomes (HECs) have several potential advantages over currently used vectors for gene therapy applications. Firstly, there is no upper size limit to DNA that can be cloned in these vectors. Secondly, their extrachromosomal nature ensures that introduced genes are neither disruptive to, nor affected by, the genome of the host cell. Finally, being solely human in origin, HEC vectors should not evoke adverse host immunogenic responses. Recent advances have produced a variety of HECs via several different approaches. This review focuses on the current methodologies for making HEC vectors, the advantages and problems associated with each strategy, and discusses the outlook for HEC vectors as ex vivo therapeutic agents.

Chromosomes, Artificial, Human↗